ON THE EDITING OF ELIZABETHAN TEXTS

L. Kirschbaum
{"title":"ON THE EDITING OF ELIZABETHAN TEXTS","authors":"L. Kirschbaum","doi":"10.1086/opporeserenadram.5.43264610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the and of tho third of his Sandors locturos (1958 )> Professor Frodson Bowors writ os, in an agrooftbly humblo voini \"Tho union of tho critical judgnont with tho bibliographical rethod i3 tho hopo for tho futuro» Bibliography alono will carry one a long way toward good editing, but it is no magic carpet to tho Promised Land. And if undue expectation is arousod that it will solvo all problems, tho disappointment will bo tho keonor. It is truo that loss ham than usual nay bo causod to a text if tho bibliographical method is narrowly followed; but for the real principios of editing, for the discipline that places editing as alno s t a creativo art, bibliography is only ono of atriad that also includes language study but above all literary criticism shaping the judgment withjp certain linlts proscribed jfifià language...» Id tho history of Shakospeo.ro oditing ospocially in tho twentieth contury when a little bibliography has sonetinos becono a rather dangerous thing-I should prefer the tasto and judgment of a Kittrodgo (wrong as ho sonet ine s was).,. to tho unskilled and thoreforo unscientific operation of a scientific method as if it wore the whole answer to tho problon and automatically relieved an Oditor of tho necessity to uso his critical judgment in any way. Bibliography can only help to preparo a text for tho final operation. Bibliography is a good servant but a bad master\" (Textual and Litorarv Criticisn. Cambridge, 1959, pp. 115-16).","PeriodicalId":275331,"journal":{"name":"Opportunities for Research in Renaissance Drama","volume":"338 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1959-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Opportunities for Research in Renaissance Drama","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/opporeserenadram.5.43264610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

At the and of tho third of his Sandors locturos (1958 )> Professor Frodson Bowors writ os, in an agrooftbly humblo voini "Tho union of tho critical judgnont with tho bibliographical rethod i3 tho hopo for tho futuro» Bibliography alono will carry one a long way toward good editing, but it is no magic carpet to tho Promised Land. And if undue expectation is arousod that it will solvo all problems, tho disappointment will bo tho keonor. It is truo that loss ham than usual nay bo causod to a text if tho bibliographical method is narrowly followed; but for the real principios of editing, for the discipline that places editing as alno s t a creativo art, bibliography is only ono of atriad that also includes language study but above all literary criticism shaping the judgment withjp certain linlts proscribed jfifià language...» Id tho history of Shakospeo.ro oditing ospocially in tho twentieth contury when a little bibliography has sonetinos becono a rather dangerous thing-I should prefer the tasto and judgment of a Kittrodgo (wrong as ho sonet ine s was).,. to tho unskilled and thoreforo unscientific operation of a scientific method as if it wore the whole answer to tho problon and automatically relieved an Oditor of tho necessity to uso his critical judgment in any way. Bibliography can only help to preparo a text for tho final operation. Bibliography is a good servant but a bad master" (Textual and Litorarv Criticisn. Cambridge, 1959, pp. 115-16).
论伊丽莎白时代文本的编辑
Frodson Bowors教授在他的《Sandors》(1958)系列丛书的三分之一的结尾,以一种极其谦逊的方式写道:“批判性判断与参考书目方法的结合是对未来的希望。”参考书目本身将带我们走向良好的编辑,但它不是通往应许之地的魔毯。如果不适当的期望会解决所有的问题,那么失望就会扼杀你的荣誉。诚然,如果严格遵循书目方法,对文本造成的损失比通常情况下要大;但是对于编辑的真正原则来说,对于将编辑视为一门创造性艺术的学科来说,目录学只是一门学科,它还包括语言研究,但首先是文学批评,用某些被禁止的语言来塑造判断。我了解了莎士比亚的历史。在20世纪,当一个小小的参考书目已经成为一件相当危险的事情时,我更喜欢基特罗戈的品味和判断(尽管他的诗行是错误的)。对一种科学方法进行不熟练的、因而也不科学的操作,仿佛它能提供问题的全部答案,并自动使审稿人不必以任何方式进行批判性判断。参考书目只能帮助为最后的操作准备文本。参考书目是一个好仆人,却是一个坏主人”(考据与文学批评)。剑桥,1959年,第115-16页)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信