Autoimmunity in Interstitial lung diseases: preliminary data from a tertiary center.

E. Vivarelli, G. Vitiello, Francesco Tinghi, D. Malandrino, B. Palterer, E. Torricelli, E. Bargagli, E. Rosi, P. Parronchi
{"title":"Autoimmunity in Interstitial lung diseases: preliminary data from a tertiary center.","authors":"E. Vivarelli, G. Vitiello, Francesco Tinghi, D. Malandrino, B. Palterer, E. Torricelli, E. Bargagli, E. Rosi, P. Parronchi","doi":"10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.PA2991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) involve lung interstitium and airspaces and can be either idiopathic or a complication of connective tissue diseases (CTD). Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) is a recently defined group of ILD showing some CTD features, but without fulfilling classification criteria for CTD. Aim of the study: to describe the main clinical, serological, instrumental and therapeutic features of a cohort of patients referred to our outpatient Immunology Clinic by pulmonologists, after multidisciplinary evaluation. Methods: clinical, laboratory and instrumental data were retrospectively collected from 60 patients. Results: Our cohort was divided into 3 groups: patients with a definite diagnosis of CTD (n=24); IPAF group (n=14); control group (n=22), including patients not fulfilling criteria for IPAF or a CTD, but with isolate presence of ILD. Main data are summarized in the attached figure. Conclusions: Despite the descriptive and retrospective design of our study, these data show that IPAF group exhibits worse lung function and 6MW tests performance, albeit their clinical and serological similarities with CTD. Our CTD group contains a high number of UIP, generally associated to a worse prognosis and linked to the high prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis. Surprisingly, their outcome is better than NSIP-related IPAF group.","PeriodicalId":178396,"journal":{"name":"ILD/DPLD of known origin","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ILD/DPLD of known origin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.PA2991","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) involve lung interstitium and airspaces and can be either idiopathic or a complication of connective tissue diseases (CTD). Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) is a recently defined group of ILD showing some CTD features, but without fulfilling classification criteria for CTD. Aim of the study: to describe the main clinical, serological, instrumental and therapeutic features of a cohort of patients referred to our outpatient Immunology Clinic by pulmonologists, after multidisciplinary evaluation. Methods: clinical, laboratory and instrumental data were retrospectively collected from 60 patients. Results: Our cohort was divided into 3 groups: patients with a definite diagnosis of CTD (n=24); IPAF group (n=14); control group (n=22), including patients not fulfilling criteria for IPAF or a CTD, but with isolate presence of ILD. Main data are summarized in the attached figure. Conclusions: Despite the descriptive and retrospective design of our study, these data show that IPAF group exhibits worse lung function and 6MW tests performance, albeit their clinical and serological similarities with CTD. Our CTD group contains a high number of UIP, generally associated to a worse prognosis and linked to the high prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis. Surprisingly, their outcome is better than NSIP-related IPAF group.
间质性肺疾病的自身免疫:来自三级中心的初步数据。
间质性肺疾病(ILD)涉及肺间质和肺间隙,可以是特发性的,也可以是结缔组织疾病(CTD)的并发症。具有自身免疫性特征的间质性肺炎(IPAF)是最近定义的一组ILD,显示一些CTD特征,但不符合CTD的分类标准。本研究的目的:描述由肺科医生在多学科评估后转介到我们门诊免疫学诊所的一组患者的主要临床、血清学、仪器和治疗特征。方法:回顾性收集60例患者的临床、实验室及仪器资料。结果:我们的队列分为3组:明确诊断为CTD的患者(n=24);IPAF组(n=14);对照组(n=22),包括不符合IPAF或CTD标准但单独存在ILD的患者。主要数据汇总在附图中。结论:尽管我们的研究采用了描述性和回顾性设计,但这些数据表明,IPAF组的肺功能和6MW测试性能较差,尽管其临床和血清学与CTD相似。我们的CTD组包含大量的UIP,通常与较差的预后相关,并与类风湿关节炎的高患病率相关。令人惊讶的是,他们的结果比nsip相关的IPAF组好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信