{"title":"An Analysis of Bülent Erkmen's Book Cover Designs Between 1979-1983 According to Erwin Panofsky's Iconographic and Iconological Criticism Method","authors":"Özlem Kum","doi":"10.55107/turksosbilder.1121639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, the book covers designed by Bülent Erkmen between 1973-1983 were analyzed based on Erwin Panofsky's \"Iconographic and Iconological Art Criticism\" method, in line with the Secondary or Conventional Meaning (Iconographic Analysis) method, which is one of these criticism methods. \nIn iconography, in order to know what a work tells or what it makes visible, it is necessary to know all the features of the work. By evaluating the conventional meaning of 6 book covers designed by Bülent Erkmen for different publishing houses, the stories and symbolic ties in the designs were compiled, and the main feeling of the study was tried to be revealed with this method. \nIn the study, literature review from descriptive analysis methods, document review from qualitative research methods and Secondary or conventional meaning (Iconographic Analysis), one of Erwin Panofsky's \"Iconographic and Iconological Art Criticism\" methods, were used. \nErkmen tried to reflect the main feeling of the book in his design by adhering to the narratives of the authors in the book cover designs he made in a 10-year period. Erkmen, who applied a unique linear method in accordance with the sociological structure of the period, applied the symbolic bonds in a way that would form a unity with his art. On the other hand, Erkmen draws attention with the designs on the cover of the book that offer signs from the story in the content. In the analysis, it has been revealed that Erkmen's use of allegories is not a coincidence, and that he exhibits integrity with his art.","PeriodicalId":152541,"journal":{"name":"Uluslararası Türk Kültür Coğrafyasında Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uluslararası Türk Kültür Coğrafyasında Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55107/turksosbilder.1121639","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this article, the book covers designed by Bülent Erkmen between 1973-1983 were analyzed based on Erwin Panofsky's "Iconographic and Iconological Art Criticism" method, in line with the Secondary or Conventional Meaning (Iconographic Analysis) method, which is one of these criticism methods.
In iconography, in order to know what a work tells or what it makes visible, it is necessary to know all the features of the work. By evaluating the conventional meaning of 6 book covers designed by Bülent Erkmen for different publishing houses, the stories and symbolic ties in the designs were compiled, and the main feeling of the study was tried to be revealed with this method.
In the study, literature review from descriptive analysis methods, document review from qualitative research methods and Secondary or conventional meaning (Iconographic Analysis), one of Erwin Panofsky's "Iconographic and Iconological Art Criticism" methods, were used.
Erkmen tried to reflect the main feeling of the book in his design by adhering to the narratives of the authors in the book cover designs he made in a 10-year period. Erkmen, who applied a unique linear method in accordance with the sociological structure of the period, applied the symbolic bonds in a way that would form a unity with his art. On the other hand, Erkmen draws attention with the designs on the cover of the book that offer signs from the story in the content. In the analysis, it has been revealed that Erkmen's use of allegories is not a coincidence, and that he exhibits integrity with his art.
本文以Erwin Panofsky的“图像学与图像学艺术批评”(Iconographic and Iconological Art Criticism)方法为基础,对伦特·埃尔克曼在1973-1983年间设计的书籍封面进行分析,并采用其中一种批评方法——“次要或常规意义(Iconographic Analysis)”方法。在肖像学中,为了了解一件作品所讲述的内容或它所呈现的内容,有必要了解作品的所有特征。通过对借出Erkmen为不同出版社设计的6本图书封面的传统意义进行评价,整理设计中的故事和符号联系,并试图用这种方法揭示研究的主要感受。本研究采用了描述性分析方法的文献综述、定性研究方法的文献综述以及Erwin Panofsky的“图像学和图像学艺术批评”方法之一的Secondary或conventional meaning (Iconographic analysis)。Erkmen试图在他的设计中体现书的主要感觉,他在10年的时间里在书的封面设计中坚持作者的叙述。Erkmen运用了一种独特的线性方法,与当时的社会学结构相一致,以一种与他的艺术形成统一的方式应用了符号联系。另一方面,Erkmen在书的封面上设计了从内容中提供故事标志的设计,吸引了人们的注意力。在分析中,揭示了埃尔克曼对寓言的使用不是巧合,他展示了他的艺术的完整性。