Adalimumab protection trough patents of invention: a comparison of the strategies adopted by the American, Brazilian and European Patent Offices

M. Silva, I. Fierro
{"title":"Adalimumab protection trough patents of invention: a comparison of the strategies adopted by the American, Brazilian and European Patent Offices","authors":"M. Silva, I. Fierro","doi":"10.35259/ISI.SACT.2019_32842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Biological drugs displayed an exponential development in recent years. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), in particular, have proved to be one of the main categories of these drugs, incorporating several innovations in their production. In order to protect these innovative products, patent protection has been widely used by companies, from startups to multinationals. However, although allowing the return of investments in the R&D of new drugs, patent protection creates an exploitation monopoly which leads to an increase of costs by national health systems. According to the Brazilian Ministry of Health, biological drugs represent 40% of the costs with drugs, but only 2% of the total drugs volume. These high costs may be due to the exceptions admitted by the sole paragraph of article 40 of the Brazilian Patent Statute, which allows the extension of the patent term if the examination takes more than 10 years, and to the Brazilian Patent Office delay in finishing the examination, the socalled backlog. Therefore, the identification of common points in patent examination among several patent offices could reduce the examination time and, ultimately, the backlog.","PeriodicalId":427855,"journal":{"name":"Anais do IV International Symposium on Immunobiological e VII Seminário Anual Científico e Tecnológico de Bio-Manguinhos","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anais do IV International Symposium on Immunobiological e VII Seminário Anual Científico e Tecnológico de Bio-Manguinhos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35259/ISI.SACT.2019_32842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Biological drugs displayed an exponential development in recent years. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), in particular, have proved to be one of the main categories of these drugs, incorporating several innovations in their production. In order to protect these innovative products, patent protection has been widely used by companies, from startups to multinationals. However, although allowing the return of investments in the R&D of new drugs, patent protection creates an exploitation monopoly which leads to an increase of costs by national health systems. According to the Brazilian Ministry of Health, biological drugs represent 40% of the costs with drugs, but only 2% of the total drugs volume. These high costs may be due to the exceptions admitted by the sole paragraph of article 40 of the Brazilian Patent Statute, which allows the extension of the patent term if the examination takes more than 10 years, and to the Brazilian Patent Office delay in finishing the examination, the socalled backlog. Therefore, the identification of common points in patent examination among several patent offices could reduce the examination time and, ultimately, the backlog.
通过发明专利保护阿达木单抗:美国、巴西和欧洲专利局采用的策略比较
生物药物近年来呈指数级发展。特别是单克隆抗体(mab),已被证明是这些药物的主要类别之一,在其生产中结合了一些创新。为了保护这些创新产品,从初创公司到跨国公司,许多公司都广泛使用专利保护。然而,尽管专利保护使新药研发投资获得回报,但它造成了一种剥削性垄断,导致国家卫生系统的成本增加。根据巴西卫生部的数据,生物药品占药品成本的40%,但仅占药品总量的2%。这些高昂的费用可能是由于《巴西专利法》第40条唯一一款所允许的例外情况,即如果审查需要10年以上,则允许延长专利期限,以及巴西专利局延迟完成审查,即所谓的积压。因此,确定几个专利局之间专利审查的共同点可以减少审查时间,并最终减少积压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信