Legal Security of State Support of Innovative Activities

Dmytro Vysotsky
{"title":"Legal Security of State Support of Innovative Activities","authors":"Dmytro Vysotsky","doi":"10.37772/2518-1718-2023-2(42)-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem setting. The need to transition the economy of Ukraine to an innovative model of further development is dictated by the realities of today. The unsatisfactory state of innovative activity of the majority of economic entities of Ukraine is primarily explained by the limited financial resources aimed at investing in the implementation of innovative projects. The regulatory and legal acts adopted over the last several decades, which determine the legal basis of state support for innovative activity, do not contain an effective legal mechanism for providing subjects of innovative activity with affordable financial and other support for innovative projects. The main legislative acts in the field of innovative activity are unclear and inconsistent, which makes it impossible for economic entities to receive financial support for the implementation of their innovative projects. Purpose of the research is to study the problems of legal support of state support for innovative activities and the development of legislative proposals to improve such types of state support for subjects of innovative activity as financial support for the implementation of innovative projects and preferential taxation. Analysis of recent researches and publications. The study of the legal provision of state support for innovative activities is devoted to the works of various authors, in particular: Yu.E. Atamanova, S.V. Hlibko, O.V. Rozgon, Yu.V. Georgievskogo and others. However, the majority of research is purely economic in nature and is not closely “linked” to current national and foreign legislation. Article’s main body. The article is devoted to the main problems of legal support of state support for innovative activities. The work examines the main types of financial and tax support for subjects of innovative activity. Certain “gaps” were identified in the Law of Ukraine “On Innovative Activities” in terms of defining the legal mechanism for providing such type of financial support for innovative activities as crediting innovative projects. The author of the article established the inconsistency of the provisions of the Charter of the State Innovative Financial and Credit Institution with the main purpose of this type of financial support for innovative activities, such as the provision of state guarantees to banks providing loans for innovative projects. Legislative proposals have been developed to improve certain types of financial support for innovative activities, such as preferential lending, provision of state guarantees to commercial banks that provide loans for innovative projects, property insurance for the implementation of innovative projects, and financial leasing. It is proposed to improve the legislative criteria for competitive selection of innovative projects with the aim of providing certain types of financial support to subjects of innovative activity. The article analyzes the peculiarities of the legal regime of state support for innovative activities of technology parks. The imperfection of the types of state support for the innovative activity of technological parks, which are provided for by the current legislation of Ukraine, has been established, namely: 1) lack of clear legal regulation of the targeted use by the management bodies of technology parks of funds received by them as a result of providing targeted subsidies to participants of technology parks for the implementation of innovative projects; 2) the uncertainty of the order and criteria for accepting new participants into the technology parks through the conclusion of agreements on joint activities, which may have negative consequences in the form of discrimination of subjects of innovative activity; 3) the absence of special conditions in the current legislation of Ukraine for agreements on joint activities, which are concluded between the participants of technology parks and their management bodies; 4) the inadmissibility of the conditions for the creation of joint ventures, the founders of which can be technological parks, their participants and other natural or legal entities, for the majority of subjects of small innovative entrepreneurship; 5) the absence of the main goal of the activity of technological parks in the Law of Ukraine “On the Special Regime of Innovative Activities of Technological Parks”, which should be to create conditions for supporting the innovative activities of small business entities. Conclusions and prospects for the development. In order to optimize the provision of this type of financial support for innovative activity as lending, the author proposed to legally determine the grace period for the repayment of loans issued to subjects of innovative activity. In order to form an effective mechanism for providing this type of financial support for innovative activities, such as providing state guarantees to commercial banks that provide credit to priority innovative projects, it is necessary to legislate state responsibility for the obligations of state innovative financial and credit institutions. Effective and unimplemented in the legislation of Ukraine is such a type of financial support for innovative activities as the purchase (from budget funds) of fixed assets necessary for the implementation of innovative projects, with their subsequent transfer to financial leasing to the executors of these projects. In order to support the innovative activities of small business entities, it is proposed to oblige at the legislative level all technology parks that are included in the special regime provided for by law to create specialized financial and credit institutions that must provide loans on preferential terms to small innovative entities entrepreneurship.","PeriodicalId":133481,"journal":{"name":"Law and innovations","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law and innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37772/2518-1718-2023-2(42)-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problem setting. The need to transition the economy of Ukraine to an innovative model of further development is dictated by the realities of today. The unsatisfactory state of innovative activity of the majority of economic entities of Ukraine is primarily explained by the limited financial resources aimed at investing in the implementation of innovative projects. The regulatory and legal acts adopted over the last several decades, which determine the legal basis of state support for innovative activity, do not contain an effective legal mechanism for providing subjects of innovative activity with affordable financial and other support for innovative projects. The main legislative acts in the field of innovative activity are unclear and inconsistent, which makes it impossible for economic entities to receive financial support for the implementation of their innovative projects. Purpose of the research is to study the problems of legal support of state support for innovative activities and the development of legislative proposals to improve such types of state support for subjects of innovative activity as financial support for the implementation of innovative projects and preferential taxation. Analysis of recent researches and publications. The study of the legal provision of state support for innovative activities is devoted to the works of various authors, in particular: Yu.E. Atamanova, S.V. Hlibko, O.V. Rozgon, Yu.V. Georgievskogo and others. However, the majority of research is purely economic in nature and is not closely “linked” to current national and foreign legislation. Article’s main body. The article is devoted to the main problems of legal support of state support for innovative activities. The work examines the main types of financial and tax support for subjects of innovative activity. Certain “gaps” were identified in the Law of Ukraine “On Innovative Activities” in terms of defining the legal mechanism for providing such type of financial support for innovative activities as crediting innovative projects. The author of the article established the inconsistency of the provisions of the Charter of the State Innovative Financial and Credit Institution with the main purpose of this type of financial support for innovative activities, such as the provision of state guarantees to banks providing loans for innovative projects. Legislative proposals have been developed to improve certain types of financial support for innovative activities, such as preferential lending, provision of state guarantees to commercial banks that provide loans for innovative projects, property insurance for the implementation of innovative projects, and financial leasing. It is proposed to improve the legislative criteria for competitive selection of innovative projects with the aim of providing certain types of financial support to subjects of innovative activity. The article analyzes the peculiarities of the legal regime of state support for innovative activities of technology parks. The imperfection of the types of state support for the innovative activity of technological parks, which are provided for by the current legislation of Ukraine, has been established, namely: 1) lack of clear legal regulation of the targeted use by the management bodies of technology parks of funds received by them as a result of providing targeted subsidies to participants of technology parks for the implementation of innovative projects; 2) the uncertainty of the order and criteria for accepting new participants into the technology parks through the conclusion of agreements on joint activities, which may have negative consequences in the form of discrimination of subjects of innovative activity; 3) the absence of special conditions in the current legislation of Ukraine for agreements on joint activities, which are concluded between the participants of technology parks and their management bodies; 4) the inadmissibility of the conditions for the creation of joint ventures, the founders of which can be technological parks, their participants and other natural or legal entities, for the majority of subjects of small innovative entrepreneurship; 5) the absence of the main goal of the activity of technological parks in the Law of Ukraine “On the Special Regime of Innovative Activities of Technological Parks”, which should be to create conditions for supporting the innovative activities of small business entities. Conclusions and prospects for the development. In order to optimize the provision of this type of financial support for innovative activity as lending, the author proposed to legally determine the grace period for the repayment of loans issued to subjects of innovative activity. In order to form an effective mechanism for providing this type of financial support for innovative activities, such as providing state guarantees to commercial banks that provide credit to priority innovative projects, it is necessary to legislate state responsibility for the obligations of state innovative financial and credit institutions. Effective and unimplemented in the legislation of Ukraine is such a type of financial support for innovative activities as the purchase (from budget funds) of fixed assets necessary for the implementation of innovative projects, with their subsequent transfer to financial leasing to the executors of these projects. In order to support the innovative activities of small business entities, it is proposed to oblige at the legislative level all technology parks that are included in the special regime provided for by law to create specialized financial and credit institutions that must provide loans on preferential terms to small innovative entities entrepreneurship.
国家支持创新活动的法律保障
问题设置。今天的现实决定了将乌克兰经济转变为进一步发展的创新模式的必要性。乌克兰大多数经济实体的创新活动状况不理想,主要原因是用于投资实施创新项目的财政资源有限。过去几十年通过的监管和法律法案确定了国家支持创新活动的法律基础,但没有包含有效的法律机制,为创新活动的主体提供负担得起的资金和其他支持。创新活动领域的主要立法行为不明确和不一致,这使得经济实体无法获得实施其创新项目的财政支持。研究的目的是研究国家支持创新活动的法律支持问题,并提出立法建议,以完善国家对创新活动主体的支持,如对创新项目实施的财政支持、税收优惠等。分析最近的研究和出版物。关于国家支持创新活动的法律规定的研究主要集中在不同作者的作品上,特别是:俞氏。Atamanova, S.V. Hlibko, O.V. Rozgon, yu。格奥尔基耶夫斯科戈和其他人。然而,大多数研究纯粹是经济性质的,与当前的国家和外国立法没有密切“联系”。文章的主体。本文探讨了国家支持创新活动的法律支持的主要问题。这项工作审查了对创新活动主题的财政和税收支助的主要类型。乌克兰“关于创新活动”的法律确定了为创新活动提供财政支助的法律机制,如为创新项目提供信贷方面的某些“差距”。文章的作者确立了《国家创新金融信贷机构章程》的规定与这类金融支持创新活动的主要目的不一致,例如向为创新项目提供贷款的银行提供国家担保。已经制定了立法建议,以改善对创新活动的某些类型的财政支持,例如优惠贷款、向为创新项目提供贷款的商业银行提供国家担保、为实施创新项目提供财产保险以及融资租赁。建议改进竞争性选择创新项目的立法标准,以便向创新活动的主体提供某些类型的财政支助。本文分析了国家支持科技园创新活动法律制度的特殊性。乌克兰现行立法规定的国家对科技园创新活动支持类型的不完善已经确立,即:1)由于向科技园参与者提供实施创新项目的定向补贴,科技园管理机构对其收到的资金的定向使用缺乏明确的法律规定;2)通过联合活动协议接受新参与者进入科技园的顺序和标准的不确定性,这可能以歧视创新活动主体的形式产生负面后果;3)乌克兰现行立法中对技术园区参与者与其管理机构之间缔结的联合活动协定缺乏特殊条件;4)对于大多数小型创新创业主体,不具备成立合资企业的条件,合资企业的创始人可以是科技园、其参与者和其他自然或法人实体;5)乌克兰“科技园创新活动特别制度”法律中没有科技园活动的主要目标,这应该是为支持小企业实体的创新活动创造条件。结论及发展展望。为了优化对此类创新活动的金融支持,笔者建议通过法律手段确定创新活动主体贷款的还款宽限期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信