Stress in the cybersecurity profession: a systematic review of related literature and opportunities for future research

Tripti Singh, Allen C. Johnston, J. D'Arcy, P. Harms
{"title":"Stress in the cybersecurity profession: a systematic review of related literature and opportunities for future research","authors":"Tripti Singh, Allen C. Johnston, J. D'Arcy, P. Harms","doi":"10.1108/ocj-06-2022-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe impact of stress on personal and work-related outcomes has been studied in the information systems (IS) literature across several professions. However, the cybersecurity profession has received little attention despite numerous reports suggesting stress is a leading cause of various adverse professional outcomes. Cybersecurity professionals work in a constantly changing adversarial threat landscape, are focused on enforcement rather than compliance, and are required to adhere to ever-changing industry mandates – a work environment that is stressful and has been likened to a war zone. Hence, this literature review aims to reveal gaps and trends in the current extant general workplace and IS-specific stress literature and illuminate potentially fruitful paths for future research focused on stress among cybersecurity professionals.Design/methodology/approachUsing the systematic literature review process (Okoli and Schabram, 2010), the authors examined the current IS research that studies stress in organizations. A disciplinary corpus was generated from IS journals and conferences encompassing 30 years. The authors analyzed 293 articles from 21 journals and six conferences to retain 77 articles and four conference proceedings for literature review.FindingsThe findings reveal four key research opportunities. First, the demands experienced by cybersecurity professionals are distinct from the demands experienced by regular information technology (IT) professionals. Second, it is crucial to identify the appraisal process that cybersecurity professionals follow in assessing security demands. Third, there are many stress responses from cybersecurity professionals, not just negative responses. Fourth, future research should focus on stress-related outcomes such as employee productivity, job satisfaction, job turnover, etc., and not only security compliance among cybersecurity professionals.Originality/valueThis study is the first to provide a systematic synthesis of the IS stress literature to reveal gaps, trends and opportunities for future research focused on stress among cybersecurity professionals. The study presents several novel trends and research opportunities. It contends that the demands experienced by cybersecurity professionals are distinct from those experienced by regular IT professionals and scholars should seek to identify the key characteristics of these demands that influence their appraisal process. Also, there are many stress responses, not just negative responses, deserving increased attention and future research should focus on unexplored stress-related outcomes for cybersecurity professionals.","PeriodicalId":107089,"journal":{"name":"Organizational Cybersecurity Journal: Practice, Process and People","volume":"-1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizational Cybersecurity Journal: Practice, Process and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ocj-06-2022-0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe impact of stress on personal and work-related outcomes has been studied in the information systems (IS) literature across several professions. However, the cybersecurity profession has received little attention despite numerous reports suggesting stress is a leading cause of various adverse professional outcomes. Cybersecurity professionals work in a constantly changing adversarial threat landscape, are focused on enforcement rather than compliance, and are required to adhere to ever-changing industry mandates – a work environment that is stressful and has been likened to a war zone. Hence, this literature review aims to reveal gaps and trends in the current extant general workplace and IS-specific stress literature and illuminate potentially fruitful paths for future research focused on stress among cybersecurity professionals.Design/methodology/approachUsing the systematic literature review process (Okoli and Schabram, 2010), the authors examined the current IS research that studies stress in organizations. A disciplinary corpus was generated from IS journals and conferences encompassing 30 years. The authors analyzed 293 articles from 21 journals and six conferences to retain 77 articles and four conference proceedings for literature review.FindingsThe findings reveal four key research opportunities. First, the demands experienced by cybersecurity professionals are distinct from the demands experienced by regular information technology (IT) professionals. Second, it is crucial to identify the appraisal process that cybersecurity professionals follow in assessing security demands. Third, there are many stress responses from cybersecurity professionals, not just negative responses. Fourth, future research should focus on stress-related outcomes such as employee productivity, job satisfaction, job turnover, etc., and not only security compliance among cybersecurity professionals.Originality/valueThis study is the first to provide a systematic synthesis of the IS stress literature to reveal gaps, trends and opportunities for future research focused on stress among cybersecurity professionals. The study presents several novel trends and research opportunities. It contends that the demands experienced by cybersecurity professionals are distinct from those experienced by regular IT professionals and scholars should seek to identify the key characteristics of these demands that influence their appraisal process. Also, there are many stress responses, not just negative responses, deserving increased attention and future research should focus on unexplored stress-related outcomes for cybersecurity professionals.
网络安全专业的压力:相关文献的系统回顾和未来研究的机会
在信息系统(IS)文献中,研究了压力对个人和工作相关结果的影响。然而,尽管有大量报告表明压力是导致各种不利职业结果的主要原因,但网络安全行业却很少受到关注。网络安全专业人员在不断变化的敌对威胁环境中工作,他们关注的是执行而不是合规,并且需要遵守不断变化的行业指令——这是一个压力很大的工作环境,被比作战区。因此,本文献综述旨在揭示当前现有的一般工作场所和is特定压力文献中的差距和趋势,并为未来关注网络安全专业人员压力的研究阐明可能富有成效的路径。设计/方法/方法采用系统的文献回顾过程(Okoli和Schabram, 2010),作者检查了目前研究组织压力的IS研究。一个学科语料库是从IS期刊和会议中产生的,涵盖了30年。作者分析了来自21个期刊和6个会议的293篇文章,保留了77篇文章和4个会议记录进行文献综述。研究结果研究结果揭示了四个关键的研究机会。首先,网络安全专业人员所经历的需求与常规信息技术(IT)专业人员所经历的需求不同。其次,确定网络安全专业人员在评估安全需求时遵循的评估过程至关重要。第三,网络安全专业人员有许多压力反应,而不仅仅是消极反应。第四,未来的研究应该关注与压力相关的结果,如员工生产力、工作满意度、工作流动率等,而不仅仅是网络安全专业人员的安全合规性。原创性/价值本研究首次对is压力文献进行了系统的综合,揭示了未来网络安全专业人员压力研究的差距、趋势和机会。该研究提出了几个新的趋势和研究机会。它认为,网络安全专业人员所经历的需求与普通It专业人员所经历的需求不同,学者们应该设法确定这些需求的关键特征,这些特征会影响他们的评估过程。此外,有许多压力反应,而不仅仅是负面反应,值得更多的关注,未来的研究应该集中在网络安全专业人员未探索的压力相关结果上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信