{"title":"Economical Tests for Assessing Corrosion Performance of Steel in Concrete","authors":"Ceki Halmen, K. Reinschmidt, D. Trejo","doi":"10.14359/51685619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The repair and rehabilitation of corroding infrastructure systems consumes significant resources. It is well documented that significant value is gained by using durable materials that exhibit long-term, repair-free performance. In the US, most state highway agencies (SHAs) are approached by material producers and requests are made to evaluate the material for possible use in the infrastructure system. SHAs have limited resources and are in need of new evaluation methods that are reliable, fast, and cost-effective. This research evaluated four different accelerated test methods for evaluating the corrosion performance of steel in cementitious materials. Results were compared with results from the commonly used standard ASTM G 109 test method. The corrosion performance of conventional bars, stainless steel bars, galvanized bars, and epoxy-coated bars were evaluated using concrete and mortar mixtures with different water-cement ratios and containing different amounts of a corrosion inhibitor. The effectiveness, time requirements, complexity, and costs of the new test methods were compared with the ASTM G 109 method. This research found that the Rapid Macro-cell Test (RMT) is relatively simple to perform and provides reasonable results for most products in a reasonable time frame with minimal relative cost.","PeriodicalId":242991,"journal":{"name":"SP-291: Corrosion of Reinforcing Steel in Concrete - Future Direction: Proceedings-Hope & Schupack Corrosion Symposium","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SP-291: Corrosion of Reinforcing Steel in Concrete - Future Direction: Proceedings-Hope & Schupack Corrosion Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14359/51685619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The repair and rehabilitation of corroding infrastructure systems consumes significant resources. It is well documented that significant value is gained by using durable materials that exhibit long-term, repair-free performance. In the US, most state highway agencies (SHAs) are approached by material producers and requests are made to evaluate the material for possible use in the infrastructure system. SHAs have limited resources and are in need of new evaluation methods that are reliable, fast, and cost-effective. This research evaluated four different accelerated test methods for evaluating the corrosion performance of steel in cementitious materials. Results were compared with results from the commonly used standard ASTM G 109 test method. The corrosion performance of conventional bars, stainless steel bars, galvanized bars, and epoxy-coated bars were evaluated using concrete and mortar mixtures with different water-cement ratios and containing different amounts of a corrosion inhibitor. The effectiveness, time requirements, complexity, and costs of the new test methods were compared with the ASTM G 109 method. This research found that the Rapid Macro-cell Test (RMT) is relatively simple to perform and provides reasonable results for most products in a reasonable time frame with minimal relative cost.
腐蚀的基础设施系统的修复和恢复消耗大量资源。有充分的证据表明,使用具有长期、免修理性能的耐用材料可以获得显著的价值。在美国,材料生产商与大多数州公路机构(sha)接洽,并要求评估材料在基础设施系统中的可能用途。sha资源有限,需要可靠、快速、经济有效的新评估方法。本研究评估了四种不同的加速试验方法来评估钢在胶凝材料中的腐蚀性能。结果与常用标准ASTM G 109试验方法的结果进行了比较。使用不同水灰比和不同缓蚀剂用量的混凝土和砂浆混合物,对传统棒材、不锈钢棒材、镀锌棒材和环氧涂层棒材的腐蚀性能进行了评估。将新测试方法的有效性、时间要求、复杂性和成本与ASTM G 109方法进行了比较。本研究发现快速巨细胞试验(RMT)操作相对简单,在合理的时间范围内以最小的相对成本为大多数产品提供合理的结果。