Whose students are they anyway?: Could a difference in how practice organisations and higher education institutions perceive social work students be a barrier to collaboration when problems arise in placement?

J. Rawles
{"title":"Whose students are they anyway?: Could a difference in how practice organisations and higher education institutions perceive social work students be a barrier to collaboration when problems arise in placement?","authors":"J. Rawles","doi":"10.1921/2202110305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper draws on case study research which explored the support needs of those involved in social work practice learning in an English local authority. Data was collected through questionnaires, and semi-structured interviews with 27 practice educators, students and team managers. Although issues relating to failing students were not intended as the primary focus of the research, this theme dominates the findings from practice educators and team managers. Practice educators cited problematic placements as a key factor in their decision not to continue in the role. A significant contributory factor in the negative impact of the failing experience is the participants’ dissatisfaction with the attitude and approach of the students’ universities. Particularly striking is the perception that universities present an obstruction to a fail decision resulting in students being passed who possibly should not do so. This paper considers whether the different institutional perceptions of the social work student and the organisations’ role in relation to them could be at the root of these difficulties in collaboration and fuel the ‘failure to fail’ debate.","PeriodicalId":446723,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of practice teaching & learning","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of practice teaching & learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1921/2202110305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper draws on case study research which explored the support needs of those involved in social work practice learning in an English local authority. Data was collected through questionnaires, and semi-structured interviews with 27 practice educators, students and team managers. Although issues relating to failing students were not intended as the primary focus of the research, this theme dominates the findings from practice educators and team managers. Practice educators cited problematic placements as a key factor in their decision not to continue in the role. A significant contributory factor in the negative impact of the failing experience is the participants’ dissatisfaction with the attitude and approach of the students’ universities. Particularly striking is the perception that universities present an obstruction to a fail decision resulting in students being passed who possibly should not do so. This paper considers whether the different institutional perceptions of the social work student and the organisations’ role in relation to them could be at the root of these difficulties in collaboration and fuel the ‘failure to fail’ debate.
他们到底是谁的学生?:实习机构和高等教育机构对社工学生的不同看法,是否会在安排学生时成为合作的障碍?
本文采用个案研究的方法,探讨了英国地方政府社会工作实习学习人员的支持需求。数据通过问卷调查和对27名实践教育者、学生和团队管理者的半结构化访谈收集。虽然与失败学生相关的问题并不是研究的主要焦点,但这一主题主导了实践教育者和团队管理者的发现。实践教育工作者认为,问题安置是他们决定不再继续担任该职位的关键因素。失败经历产生负面影响的一个重要因素是参与者对学生所在大学的态度和方法的不满。尤其引人注目的是这样一种看法,即大学阻碍了不及格的决定,导致学生可能本不应该通过考试。本文考虑了不同的机构对社会工作学生的看法以及与他们相关的组织角色是否可能是这些合作困难的根源,并助长了“失败失败”的辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信