Using the Decision Ladder to understand human decision-making processes during a UAV-equipped SAR mission

S. Hart, Victoria Steane, M. Chattington, S. Bullock, J. Noyes
{"title":"Using the Decision Ladder to understand human decision-making processes\n during a UAV-equipped SAR mission","authors":"S. Hart, Victoria Steane, M. Chattington, S. Bullock, J. Noyes","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1004123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The uptake of Uncrewed Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) within the Search and\n Rescue (SAR) application is becoming ubiquitous owing to the way in which\n UAVs can support and extend SAR responses. During a SAR mission, UAVs are\n deployed to offer a birds-eye perspective of the search space which is\n captured by the onboard payload sensors and transmitted to human operators\n in real time. Currently, this data stream is processed manually by a Payload\n Operator to identify any hazards or signs of human life on the ground.\n However, the task of identifying and extrapolating information using the\n display technology is highly challenging. This is primarily due to the high\n levels of cognitive effort which must be expended over time to detect\n sightings that are likely to be camouflaged or obscured by the surrounding\n terrain. For this reason, system engineers are looking to develop image\n classification modules capable of autonomous object detection and labelling\n to streamline the information acquisition process from the UAV. When looking\n to introduce novel functionality, such as an image classification module, it\n is important to consider how decision-making processes are currently\n undertaken by the team of human operators. In doing so, a greater\n understanding is yielded on how the current ways of working could be\n supported through further design intervention. The current work aims to\n capture these processes using the representational medium of the Decision\n Ladder. Rasmussen (1974) developed the Decision Ladder to define the\n different information processing activities undertaken by a decision-maker\n when identifying an appropriate course of action within a given situation.\n In order to develop the Decision Ladder for the UAV-equipped SAR scenario,\n knowledge elicitation activities were conducted using interviews with SAR\n personnel.The final amalgamated Decision Ladder was populated using the\n responses from the interviews. The decision model demonstrated the\n complexity of utilising UAVs to support a SAR mission due to the regulatory\n and technological constraints associated with the UAV. In addition, the\n importance of a validation activity was emphasised by the SAR personnel\n which would be conducted to determine the accuracy of any information\n presented by the automated system. Here, the decision ladder was able to\n identify the broad set of information aspects that would be reviewed by the\n human-UAV team. The subsequent knowledge obtained would be used to identify\n the relevance of a sighting and determine the most appropriate response\n using the limited resources available within the SAR environment. This\n insight provided from the Decision Ladder was used to propose a set of novel\n design recommendations that could extend the capabilities of the image\n classification module within the SAR context. Therefore, this work advocates\n the use of a user-centred design approach to support the development of\n technologies based on the tasks and cognitive processes of the end-user.","PeriodicalId":231376,"journal":{"name":"Human Systems Engineering and Design (IHSED 2023): Future Trends\n and Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Systems Engineering and Design (IHSED 2023): Future Trends\n and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1004123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The uptake of Uncrewed Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) within the Search and Rescue (SAR) application is becoming ubiquitous owing to the way in which UAVs can support and extend SAR responses. During a SAR mission, UAVs are deployed to offer a birds-eye perspective of the search space which is captured by the onboard payload sensors and transmitted to human operators in real time. Currently, this data stream is processed manually by a Payload Operator to identify any hazards or signs of human life on the ground. However, the task of identifying and extrapolating information using the display technology is highly challenging. This is primarily due to the high levels of cognitive effort which must be expended over time to detect sightings that are likely to be camouflaged or obscured by the surrounding terrain. For this reason, system engineers are looking to develop image classification modules capable of autonomous object detection and labelling to streamline the information acquisition process from the UAV. When looking to introduce novel functionality, such as an image classification module, it is important to consider how decision-making processes are currently undertaken by the team of human operators. In doing so, a greater understanding is yielded on how the current ways of working could be supported through further design intervention. The current work aims to capture these processes using the representational medium of the Decision Ladder. Rasmussen (1974) developed the Decision Ladder to define the different information processing activities undertaken by a decision-maker when identifying an appropriate course of action within a given situation. In order to develop the Decision Ladder for the UAV-equipped SAR scenario, knowledge elicitation activities were conducted using interviews with SAR personnel.The final amalgamated Decision Ladder was populated using the responses from the interviews. The decision model demonstrated the complexity of utilising UAVs to support a SAR mission due to the regulatory and technological constraints associated with the UAV. In addition, the importance of a validation activity was emphasised by the SAR personnel which would be conducted to determine the accuracy of any information presented by the automated system. Here, the decision ladder was able to identify the broad set of information aspects that would be reviewed by the human-UAV team. The subsequent knowledge obtained would be used to identify the relevance of a sighting and determine the most appropriate response using the limited resources available within the SAR environment. This insight provided from the Decision Ladder was used to propose a set of novel design recommendations that could extend the capabilities of the image classification module within the SAR context. Therefore, this work advocates the use of a user-centred design approach to support the development of technologies based on the tasks and cognitive processes of the end-user.
在装备无人机的SAR任务中,使用决策阶梯来理解人类的决策过程
无人驾驶飞行器(uav)在搜救(SAR)应用中的应用正变得无处不在,因为无人机可以支持和扩展SAR响应。在SAR任务期间,部署无人机提供搜索空间的鸟瞰图,由机载有效载荷传感器捕获并实时传输给人类操作员。目前,该数据流由有效载荷操作员手动处理,以识别地面上的任何危险或人类生命迹象。然而,使用显示技术识别和推断信息的任务是极具挑战性的。这主要是由于高水平的认知努力,随着时间的推移,必须花费时间来发现可能被周围地形伪装或遮蔽的目击事件。出于这个原因,系统工程师正在寻求开发能够自主目标检测和标记的图像分类模块,以简化来自无人机的信息获取过程。当考虑引入新的功能(如图像分类模块)时,重要的是要考虑人类操作员团队目前如何进行决策过程。在这样做的过程中,对如何通过进一步的设计干预来支持当前的工作方式有了更深入的了解。目前的工作旨在利用决策阶梯的表征媒介来捕捉这些过程。拉斯穆森(1974)发展了决策阶梯来定义决策者在给定情况下确定适当的行动方针时所进行的不同信息处理活动。为了开发无人机装备SAR场景的决策阶梯,通过与SAR人员的访谈进行了知识获取活动。最终的综合决策阶梯是使用来自面试的回答填充的。决策模型显示了由于与无人机相关的监管和技术限制,利用无人机支持SAR任务的复杂性。此外,SAR人员强调了验证活动的重要性,该活动将用于确定自动化系统提供的任何信息的准确性。在这里,决策阶梯能够确定将由人-无人机团队审查的广泛信息方面。随后获得的知识将用于确定目击事件的相关性,并利用SAR环境中有限的可用资源确定最适当的反应。决策阶梯提供的这一见解被用于提出一组新颖的设计建议,这些建议可以扩展SAR上下文中图像分类模块的功能。因此,这项工作提倡使用以用户为中心的设计方法来支持基于最终用户的任务和认知过程的技术开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信