Revising the Faculty Manual: The Client Project in Your Backyard

Heather G. Lettner-Rust
{"title":"Revising the Faculty Manual: The Client Project in Your Backyard","authors":"Heather G. Lettner-Rust","doi":"10.31719/PJAW.V2I2.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This client project is a culminating assignment in an upper-level professional writing course designed to help students understand the nature of audience-based writing in an unfamiliar writing context. The specific task is for students to revise a substantial section of the university *Faculty Policies and Procedures Manual*. Students researched their audience, analyzed samples of university manuals at other higher education institutions, exercised document design strategies, and practiced syntax revision during the project, ultimately presenting a sample of their work to faculty for feedback. Employing design workshop strategies, this assignment requires students to interview faculty in order to understand multiple users' experiences of the university Faculty Policies and Procedures Manual. In addition, an essential component for student learning in this course is reflection. This reflection is centered on the rhetorical situation of using and revising genres (Devitt, 2009) in the context of a professional environment (Clark, 2005; Kain & Wardle, 2005) in order that students avoid perceiving the class as a march through memos, reports, and emails as static formats (Miller, 1984). This project engages students independently, as they are responsible for their own revisions of 30 pages, while class time is used collaboratively on learning new ways of viewing the document's potential and the genre's function.","PeriodicalId":123191,"journal":{"name":"Prompt: A Journal of Academic Writing Assignments","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prompt: A Journal of Academic Writing Assignments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31719/PJAW.V2I2.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This client project is a culminating assignment in an upper-level professional writing course designed to help students understand the nature of audience-based writing in an unfamiliar writing context. The specific task is for students to revise a substantial section of the university *Faculty Policies and Procedures Manual*. Students researched their audience, analyzed samples of university manuals at other higher education institutions, exercised document design strategies, and practiced syntax revision during the project, ultimately presenting a sample of their work to faculty for feedback. Employing design workshop strategies, this assignment requires students to interview faculty in order to understand multiple users' experiences of the university Faculty Policies and Procedures Manual. In addition, an essential component for student learning in this course is reflection. This reflection is centered on the rhetorical situation of using and revising genres (Devitt, 2009) in the context of a professional environment (Clark, 2005; Kain & Wardle, 2005) in order that students avoid perceiving the class as a march through memos, reports, and emails as static formats (Miller, 1984). This project engages students independently, as they are responsible for their own revisions of 30 pages, while class time is used collaboratively on learning new ways of viewing the document's potential and the genre's function.
修改教师手册:后院的客户项目
本客户端项目是高级专业写作课程的最终作业,旨在帮助学生在不熟悉的写作环境中理解以观众为基础的写作的本质。具体任务是让学生修改大学的“教师政策和程序手册”的实质性部分。学生们研究了他们的读者,分析了其他高等教育机构的大学手册样本,练习了文档设计策略,并在项目期间练习了语法修改,最终将他们的工作样本提交给教师以获得反馈。采用设计研讨会策略,这项作业要求学生采访教师,以了解大学教师政策和程序手册的多个用户体验。此外,学生学习本课程的一个重要组成部分是反思。这种反思集中在专业环境中使用和修改体裁的修辞情境(Devitt, 2009) (Clark, 2005;kain&wardle, 2005),以避免学生将课堂视为通过备忘录,报告和电子邮件作为静态格式的行军(Miller, 1984)。这个项目让学生独立参与,因为他们负责自己修改30页的内容,而课堂时间则用于协作学习查看文档潜力和类型功能的新方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信