Inclusive Theatres as Boosters of Well-being:

Elena Di Giovanni, Francesca Raffi
{"title":"Inclusive Theatres as Boosters of Well-being:","authors":"Elena Di Giovanni, Francesca Raffi","doi":"10.47476/jat.v5i1.2022.223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the surge in media accessibility studies, researchers have explored the possibility of using psychological indicators to study modes of production, consumption, and reception of audiovisual and accessible media texts. However, most of the methodologies and measures applied so far tend to evaluate perception and/or reception in the short term, i.e., immediately after viewing media texts or attending live performances. This article moves from previous articles on inclusive theatres (Di Giovanni, 2021; Raffi, 2021) and sets forth to evaluate individuals’ reactions to inclusive activities in the medium to long-term. To this end, the concept of well-being becomes central, along with some of the measures and tools so far employed to measure it outside the realm of accessibility studies.\nLay summary\nMedia accessibility is the research area dealing with the theories, practices, and instruments that provide access to media products, services, and environments for people that cannot, or cannot properly, access that content in its original form. Media accessibility research has truly blossomed in the past years and has welcomed new, often not-so-close theoretical and methodological approaches. More recently, researchers have explored the possibility of using psychological indicators to evaluate perception and/or reception in the medium to long-term, i.e., the medium to long-term effects of inclusive practices in theatre and other media experiences. To this end, the concept of well-being becomes central, along with some of the measures and tools so far employed to measure it outside the realm of media accessibility studies. This article moves from previous studies on inclusive theatres, which place the people and their diverse abilities at the core, to prove that it is time to move beyond the well-established practices of feedback collection immediately or soon after a performance or event. By reporting on a two-month experiment with young people with sensory disabilities who were trained to be inclusive guides in theatres, our aim is to reflect on the impact of such events, and of participation, on people’s lives in the medium to long-term.","PeriodicalId":203332,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Audiovisual Translation","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Audiovisual Translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47476/jat.v5i1.2022.223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

With the surge in media accessibility studies, researchers have explored the possibility of using psychological indicators to study modes of production, consumption, and reception of audiovisual and accessible media texts. However, most of the methodologies and measures applied so far tend to evaluate perception and/or reception in the short term, i.e., immediately after viewing media texts or attending live performances. This article moves from previous articles on inclusive theatres (Di Giovanni, 2021; Raffi, 2021) and sets forth to evaluate individuals’ reactions to inclusive activities in the medium to long-term. To this end, the concept of well-being becomes central, along with some of the measures and tools so far employed to measure it outside the realm of accessibility studies. Lay summary Media accessibility is the research area dealing with the theories, practices, and instruments that provide access to media products, services, and environments for people that cannot, or cannot properly, access that content in its original form. Media accessibility research has truly blossomed in the past years and has welcomed new, often not-so-close theoretical and methodological approaches. More recently, researchers have explored the possibility of using psychological indicators to evaluate perception and/or reception in the medium to long-term, i.e., the medium to long-term effects of inclusive practices in theatre and other media experiences. To this end, the concept of well-being becomes central, along with some of the measures and tools so far employed to measure it outside the realm of media accessibility studies. This article moves from previous studies on inclusive theatres, which place the people and their diverse abilities at the core, to prove that it is time to move beyond the well-established practices of feedback collection immediately or soon after a performance or event. By reporting on a two-month experiment with young people with sensory disabilities who were trained to be inclusive guides in theatres, our aim is to reflect on the impact of such events, and of participation, on people’s lives in the medium to long-term.
包容性剧院是幸福的助推器:
随着媒体可及性研究的兴起,研究者们开始探索利用心理指标来研究视听和可及性媒体文本的生产、消费和接受模式的可能性。然而,迄今为止采用的大多数方法和措施倾向于在短期内评估感知和/或接受情况,即在观看媒体文本或参加现场表演后立即评估。本文从之前关于包容性剧院的文章(Di Giovanni, 2021;Raffi, 2021),并着手评估个人对中长期包容性活动的反应。为此,幸福的概念,以及迄今为止在无障碍研究领域之外用来衡量幸福的一些措施和工具,成为了核心。媒体可访问性是一个研究领域,涉及为不能或不能适当地访问原始形式的内容的人们提供访问媒体产品、服务和环境的理论、实践和工具。媒体可访问性研究在过去的几年里蓬勃发展,并欢迎新的,通常不是很接近的理论和方法方法。最近,研究人员探索了使用心理指标来评估中长期感知和/或接受的可能性,即剧院和其他媒体体验中包容性实践的中长期影响。为此,幸福的概念,以及迄今为止在媒体可及性研究领域之外用来衡量幸福的一些措施和工具,成为了核心。本文从之前对包容性剧院的研究出发,证明现在是时候超越表演或活动后立即或很快收集反馈的既定做法了。包容性剧院将人员及其多样化能力置于核心地位。我们对有感官障碍的年轻人进行了为期两个月的实验,他们接受了培训,成为剧院的包容性导游。我们的目的是反思这类活动和参与对人们生活的中长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信