Indonesia's Foreign Policy Post-Reform in the United Nations Security Council

Muhammad Zuhal Lukman
{"title":"Indonesia's Foreign Policy Post-Reform in the United Nations Security Council","authors":"Muhammad Zuhal Lukman","doi":"10.52728/ijss.v4i2.666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indonesia has a national interest in carrying out the constitutional mandate in terms of maintaining active involvement to affirm that independence is the right of all nations and colonialism is contrary to the arguments of humanity and justice. Therefore, through United Nations Security Council, Indonesia rejects all forms of colonialism, including issues between Israel and Palestine. This research focuses on Indonesia's foreign policy and its capacity as a Non-Permanent Member of the UN Security Council. The method used is a qualitative method with a literature study that is validated through an explicit confirmation process at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, while the analytical framework used is a comparative foreign policy perspective to map the factors that influence the process of making Indonesian foreign policy in different terms of office, that is president Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono 2007-2008 and Joko Widodo 2019-2020. The findings of this study indicate that consideration of enacting Indonesia's foreign policy on Palestine is a sustainable policy with the roots of the constitutional mandate and Indonesia's commitments in the past, that’s why almost no major changes can be found even though they have gone through the presidential transition process. Palestine also can be has a vital position for Indonesia considering that Palestine is the only conflicting country that has always existed in a formal discussion of Indonesian state documents. The difference can be found in how each reign reacts to external factors such as the invasion or blockade that Israel has done.","PeriodicalId":159284,"journal":{"name":"Ilomata International Journal of Social Science","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ilomata International Journal of Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52728/ijss.v4i2.666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Indonesia has a national interest in carrying out the constitutional mandate in terms of maintaining active involvement to affirm that independence is the right of all nations and colonialism is contrary to the arguments of humanity and justice. Therefore, through United Nations Security Council, Indonesia rejects all forms of colonialism, including issues between Israel and Palestine. This research focuses on Indonesia's foreign policy and its capacity as a Non-Permanent Member of the UN Security Council. The method used is a qualitative method with a literature study that is validated through an explicit confirmation process at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, while the analytical framework used is a comparative foreign policy perspective to map the factors that influence the process of making Indonesian foreign policy in different terms of office, that is president Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono 2007-2008 and Joko Widodo 2019-2020. The findings of this study indicate that consideration of enacting Indonesia's foreign policy on Palestine is a sustainable policy with the roots of the constitutional mandate and Indonesia's commitments in the past, that’s why almost no major changes can be found even though they have gone through the presidential transition process. Palestine also can be has a vital position for Indonesia considering that Palestine is the only conflicting country that has always existed in a formal discussion of Indonesian state documents. The difference can be found in how each reign reacts to external factors such as the invasion or blockade that Israel has done.
改革后印度尼西亚在联合国安理会的外交政策
印度尼西亚在执行宪法授权方面具有国家利益,即保持积极参与,以确认独立是所有国家的权利,殖民主义违背人道和正义的论点。因此,印度尼西亚通过联合国安全理事会反对一切形式的殖民主义,包括以色列和巴勒斯坦之间的问题。本研究的重点是印度尼西亚的外交政策及其作为联合国安理会非常任理事国的能力。使用的方法是通过外交部明确的确认过程验证的文献研究的定性方法,而使用的分析框架是比较外交政策视角,以绘制影响印度尼西亚外交政策制定过程的因素在不同的任期内,即总统苏西洛班邦尤多约诺2007-2008和佐科维多多2019-2020。本研究结果显示,考虑制定印尼对巴勒斯坦的外交政策是一项可持续的政策,其根源在于宪法授权和印尼过去的承诺,这就是为什么即使经历了总统过渡过程,也几乎没有发现重大变化。考虑到巴勒斯坦是一直存在于印度尼西亚国家文件正式讨论中的唯一冲突国家,巴勒斯坦对印度尼西亚也可能具有至关重要的地位。不同之处在于每个统治者对外部因素的反应,比如以色列的入侵或封锁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信