Mathematical modeling and cost comparison for electricity generation from petrol and liquified petroleum gas (LPG)

Lawal M. Olalekan, Oladepo Olatunde, Faleti I. Olufemi, Amodu A. Olamide
{"title":"Mathematical modeling and cost comparison for electricity generation from petrol and liquified petroleum gas (LPG)","authors":"Lawal M. Olalekan, Oladepo Olatunde, Faleti I. Olufemi, Amodu A. Olamide","doi":"10.31603/mesi.6697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates and compares the cost of generating electricity from petrol and liquified petroleum gas (LPG) gas using a 2.5 kVA, 50Hz Elepaq generator. It also develops mathematical models that can be used to predict important parameters of the generator The generator is connected with a multi-fuel carburetor in the experimental setup, allowing both fuel sources to be fed alternatively. The electric bulbs of different ratings were connected and varied as load. The generator was first run using petrol. The time used to exhaust half litres of petrol was recorded. It was then run with LPG for a period equal to the time of run on petrol, taking note of the mass of LPG consumed. A cost comparison was carried out and mathematical models were developed for both fuels usage using MATLAB “polyfit” command. The results show that with less or equal 1350W connection of purely resistive load. It is more economical to run the generator using LPG. However, at any load beyond 1350 W, it is economical to run the generator using petrol. The two models developed best fit the experimental results obtained with a correlation of 0.9869 and 0.9962.","PeriodicalId":177693,"journal":{"name":"Mechanical Engineering for Society and Industry","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mechanical Engineering for Society and Industry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31603/mesi.6697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study investigates and compares the cost of generating electricity from petrol and liquified petroleum gas (LPG) gas using a 2.5 kVA, 50Hz Elepaq generator. It also develops mathematical models that can be used to predict important parameters of the generator The generator is connected with a multi-fuel carburetor in the experimental setup, allowing both fuel sources to be fed alternatively. The electric bulbs of different ratings were connected and varied as load. The generator was first run using petrol. The time used to exhaust half litres of petrol was recorded. It was then run with LPG for a period equal to the time of run on petrol, taking note of the mass of LPG consumed. A cost comparison was carried out and mathematical models were developed for both fuels usage using MATLAB “polyfit” command. The results show that with less or equal 1350W connection of purely resistive load. It is more economical to run the generator using LPG. However, at any load beyond 1350 W, it is economical to run the generator using petrol. The two models developed best fit the experimental results obtained with a correlation of 0.9869 and 0.9962.
汽油和液化石油气发电的数学建模和成本比较
本研究调查并比较了使用2.5千伏安,50Hz的Elepaq发电机从汽油和液化石油气(LPG)气发电的成本。它还开发了可用于预测发电机重要参数的数学模型。在实验装置中,发电机与多燃料化油器相连,允许两种燃料源交替供油。将不同额定值的电灯泡连接起来,并根据负载变化。发电机最初是用汽油发动的。记录了消耗半升汽油所用的时间。然后用液化石油气运行一段时间,相当于汽油运行的时间,注意到液化石油气消耗的质量。利用MATLAB“polyfit”命令对两种燃料的使用情况进行了成本比较,并建立了数学模型。结果表明,与小于等于1350W的纯阻性负载连接。使用液化石油气运行发电机更为经济。然而,在任何负载超过1350瓦,它是经济运行的发电机使用汽油。两种模型拟合效果最佳,相关系数分别为0.9869和0.9962。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信