Essay on Different Modalities of Loss

Erinç Aslanboğa
{"title":"Essay on Different Modalities of Loss","authors":"Erinç Aslanboğa","doi":"10.5840/kilikya2022915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article, starting with the experience of the other's death, thinks about the questions and problems revealed by different modalities of loss. Mourning and Melancholia, the text written by Freud during the First World War and the critical rereading of this text by Derrida and Butler constitute the main axis of this article. Initially, the Freudian definition of mourning and melancholy, their distinctive features, their points of convergence and divergence, the relationship between so-called normal mourning and so-called pathological melancholy will be presented to show the ambiguity of their limits and their opposition. Secondly, one of the distinctive features of Freudian melancholy that is the transformation of the loss of the other into the loss of the self will be taken up and problematized in dialogue with Butler to bring out the place of the other as well as of its loss in the constitution of the self. This discussion makes it possible to expose how the loss of the other, which moves us from the question of detachment to that of attachment, reveals the non-identity of the self, altered by the other. The third part of this article, problematizing the finality of mourning, which is the substitution of the other, focuses on Derrida's thought that renew the approach to mourning and melancholy by introducing the concepts of “introjection” and “incorporation”. Derrida's ethic of mourning, which aims to avoid the assimilation of the other to the same, is based on a double bind between the possibility and the impossibility of mourning. The article concludes with a brief review of the relationship between identity and alterity revealed by different modalities of loss to respond differently to the question: How to return to life after the experience of the other's death?","PeriodicalId":304114,"journal":{"name":"Kilikya Felsefe Dergisi / Cilicia Journal of Philosophy","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kilikya Felsefe Dergisi / Cilicia Journal of Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/kilikya2022915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article, starting with the experience of the other's death, thinks about the questions and problems revealed by different modalities of loss. Mourning and Melancholia, the text written by Freud during the First World War and the critical rereading of this text by Derrida and Butler constitute the main axis of this article. Initially, the Freudian definition of mourning and melancholy, their distinctive features, their points of convergence and divergence, the relationship between so-called normal mourning and so-called pathological melancholy will be presented to show the ambiguity of their limits and their opposition. Secondly, one of the distinctive features of Freudian melancholy that is the transformation of the loss of the other into the loss of the self will be taken up and problematized in dialogue with Butler to bring out the place of the other as well as of its loss in the constitution of the self. This discussion makes it possible to expose how the loss of the other, which moves us from the question of detachment to that of attachment, reveals the non-identity of the self, altered by the other. The third part of this article, problematizing the finality of mourning, which is the substitution of the other, focuses on Derrida's thought that renew the approach to mourning and melancholy by introducing the concepts of “introjection” and “incorporation”. Derrida's ethic of mourning, which aims to avoid the assimilation of the other to the same, is based on a double bind between the possibility and the impossibility of mourning. The article concludes with a brief review of the relationship between identity and alterity revealed by different modalities of loss to respond differently to the question: How to return to life after the experience of the other's death?
论不同形式的损失
本文从他人死亡的经历出发,思考不同形式的失去所揭示的问题和问题。《哀悼与忧郁》是弗洛伊德在第一次世界大战期间创作的文本,德里达和巴特勒对这篇文本的批判性重读构成了本文的主轴。首先,弗洛伊德对哀悼和忧郁的定义,它们各自的特点,它们的契合点和分歧点,以及所谓的正常哀悼和所谓的病态忧郁之间的关系,以显示它们的界限和对立的模糊性。其次,弗洛伊德忧郁的一个显著特征是将他者的丧失转化为自我的丧失,这将在与巴特勒的对话中被提出并提出问题,以揭示他者的地位以及他者在自我构成中的丧失。这种讨论使我们有可能揭示他者的丧失如何将我们从超然的问题转移到依恋的问题,揭示了被他者改变的自我的非同一性。文章的第三部分,对“他者的替代”这一哀悼的终结性提出质疑,重点探讨德里达的思想通过引入“内省”和“结合”的概念,更新了哀悼和忧郁的方法。德里达的哀悼伦理,其目的在于避免他者对自己的同化,是基于哀悼的可能性和不可能性之间的双重束缚。文章最后简要回顾了不同的失去方式所揭示的身份与另类之间的关系,以不同的方式回应这个问题:在经历了他人的死亡之后,如何回归生活?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信