Maladaptive Behaviour in Phishing Susceptibility: How Email Context Influences the Impact of Persuasion Techniques

George Raywood-Burke, Dylan Jones, Phillip Morgan
{"title":"Maladaptive Behaviour in Phishing Susceptibility: How Email Context Influences the Impact of Persuasion Techniques","authors":"George Raywood-Burke, Dylan Jones, Phillip Morgan","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1003718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With over 80-90% of cyber incidents occurring in businesses and home settings often due to human errors in decision making (CybSafe, 2020; World Economic Forum, 2022; Verizon, 2022), a human-centric approach to cyber-security is needed to understand mechanisms behind maladaptive behaviours. One key area is susceptibility to phishing emails. Whilst some have investigated the success of different persuasion techniques in phishing susceptibility – most notably use of authority, urgency, and scarcity – less is known about how the wider context of the email (e.g., financial vs a work-related event) could influence the success of such techniques. The current paper presents initial findings from a repeated measures experiment where 271 participants included in the final analysis, recruited via Prolific (2022), judged whether they would or would not respond to presented email content containing a range of contexts and persuasion techniques. Diverging from previous research, participants were not necessarily more likely on average to respond to emails containing a persuasion technique, with large differences in persuasion success greatly depending upon the email context – with the proportion of response likelihood varying from 13.3% to 87.5% of participants choosing to respond. From this, not only do we demonstrate the successful impact of the main persuasion techniques and email context combinations upon phishing, but how overreliance on available information can bias individuals to engage in maladaptive cyber security behaviours.","PeriodicalId":373044,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors in Cybersecurity","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors in Cybersecurity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1003718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With over 80-90% of cyber incidents occurring in businesses and home settings often due to human errors in decision making (CybSafe, 2020; World Economic Forum, 2022; Verizon, 2022), a human-centric approach to cyber-security is needed to understand mechanisms behind maladaptive behaviours. One key area is susceptibility to phishing emails. Whilst some have investigated the success of different persuasion techniques in phishing susceptibility – most notably use of authority, urgency, and scarcity – less is known about how the wider context of the email (e.g., financial vs a work-related event) could influence the success of such techniques. The current paper presents initial findings from a repeated measures experiment where 271 participants included in the final analysis, recruited via Prolific (2022), judged whether they would or would not respond to presented email content containing a range of contexts and persuasion techniques. Diverging from previous research, participants were not necessarily more likely on average to respond to emails containing a persuasion technique, with large differences in persuasion success greatly depending upon the email context – with the proportion of response likelihood varying from 13.3% to 87.5% of participants choosing to respond. From this, not only do we demonstrate the successful impact of the main persuasion techniques and email context combinations upon phishing, but how overreliance on available information can bias individuals to engage in maladaptive cyber security behaviours.
网络钓鱼易感性中的不适应行为:电子邮件上下文如何影响说服技术的影响
超过80-90%的网络事件发生在企业和家庭环境中,通常是由于决策中的人为错误(CybSafe, 2020;世界经济论坛,2022年;Verizon, 2022),需要以人为中心的网络安全方法来理解适应不良行为背后的机制。一个关键领域是易受网络钓鱼邮件的影响。虽然一些人已经调查了不同的说服技术在网络钓鱼易感性方面的成功——最明显的是使用权威、紧迫性和稀缺性——但对于电子邮件的更广泛背景(例如,财务与工作相关的事件)如何影响这些技术的成功,我们知之甚少。目前的论文展示了一项重复测量实验的初步结果,该实验通过多产(2022)招募的271名参与者进行最终分析,判断他们是否会回复包含一系列上下文和说服技巧的电子邮件内容。与之前的研究不同,参与者不一定更愿意回复包含说服技巧的电子邮件,说服成功的很大差异很大程度上取决于电子邮件的上下文——选择回复的参与者的比例从13.3%到87.5%不等。由此,我们不仅展示了主要说服技术和电子邮件上下文组合对网络钓鱼的成功影响,还展示了过度依赖现有信息如何使个人倾向于从事适应性不良的网络安全行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信