‘Investing’ in a politics/IR degree: is the curriculum fit for purpose in the post-Browne environment?

Lisa Harrison
{"title":"‘Investing’ in a politics/IR degree: is the curriculum fit for purpose in the post-Browne environment?","authors":"Lisa Harrison","doi":"10.11120/ELSS.2011.04010012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A little over a decade ago, a survey of politics departments in UK universities lamented the challenges that academics faced at that time: increasing student numbers, limited resources, but a necessity to maintain traditional approaches to teaching and learning (Stammers et al, 1999). We now stand on the cliffedge of a very different challenge – convincing society that a politics degree is worth greater personal investment. While particular sub-disciplines of politics and IR move in and out of fashion, we cannot escape the fact that, in recent years, the subject has undergone a recruitment boom (see, for example, Harrison and Sáez, 2009). We need to ask ourselves pressing questions about where our post-2012 intake will come from and where they will go. What schools have they attended? What qualifications will influence their choice? Are we sufficiently informed about the lifelong journeys our graduates pursue as a result of their degree choice? In doing this, we will be equipped with a number of opportunities and faced by certain challenges. Opportunities","PeriodicalId":147930,"journal":{"name":"Enhancing Learning in the Social Sciences","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enhancing Learning in the Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11120/ELSS.2011.04010012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A little over a decade ago, a survey of politics departments in UK universities lamented the challenges that academics faced at that time: increasing student numbers, limited resources, but a necessity to maintain traditional approaches to teaching and learning (Stammers et al, 1999). We now stand on the cliffedge of a very different challenge – convincing society that a politics degree is worth greater personal investment. While particular sub-disciplines of politics and IR move in and out of fashion, we cannot escape the fact that, in recent years, the subject has undergone a recruitment boom (see, for example, Harrison and Sáez, 2009). We need to ask ourselves pressing questions about where our post-2012 intake will come from and where they will go. What schools have they attended? What qualifications will influence their choice? Are we sufficiently informed about the lifelong journeys our graduates pursue as a result of their degree choice? In doing this, we will be equipped with a number of opportunities and faced by certain challenges. Opportunities
政治/国际关系学位中的“投资”:课程是否适合后布朗环境?
十多年前,一项对英国大学政治系的调查哀叹了当时学术界面临的挑战:学生人数不断增加,资源有限,但必须保持传统的教学方法(Stammers et al, 1999)。现在,我们正面临着一个截然不同的挑战——让社会相信,政治学位值得更多的个人投资。虽然政治和IR的特定分支学科在流行和过时,但我们无法逃避这样一个事实,即近年来,这一学科经历了招聘热潮(例如,参见Harrison和Sáez, 2009)。我们需要问自己一些紧迫的问题:2012年后的人才从何而来,又将去向何方?他们上过什么学校?哪些条件会影响他们的选择?我们是否充分了解我们的毕业生所选择的学位所带来的终身旅程?在这样做的过程中,我们将面临一些机遇和挑战。机会
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信