SOME ASPECTS OF VOLUNTEERS’ ACTIVITIES UNDER CONDITIONS OF MARTIAL LAW

K. Denysenko, D.V. Kyseliov, I. Borko
{"title":"SOME ASPECTS OF VOLUNTEERS’ ACTIVITIES UNDER CONDITIONS OF MARTIAL LAW","authors":"K. Denysenko, D.V. Kyseliov, I. Borko","doi":"10.32755/sjlaw.2023.02.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the analysis of some aspects of volunteers’ activities under conditions of martial law. It is noted that volunterrs were the first who solved the negative challenges associated with the full-scale invasion of Russian Federation, protected and defended our country’s humanitarian sector. They risked their own lives daily saving the lives of others by evacuating from the hottest places in Ukraine, delivering life support items to the territory where hostilities were taking place. There are different formats of the forms of volunteer activity: from individual to collective ones, from direct participation to remote mode of assistance. It is noted that the war in Ukraine forced society to reconsider volunteers’ practical value and volunteer activities in particular. In modern conditions, taking into account numerous risks to life and health while volunteering, volunteers are one of the most vulnerable and unprotected categories. A clear confirmation of the above is a number of cases that, on the one hand, emphasize the role of volunteers in bringing Ukraine’s victory over the occupiers closer, and on the other hand, demonstrate the riskiness of volunteering. Analyzing the Law of Ukraine “On Volunteering”, attention is focused on contradictions that complicate volunteers’ work and lead to the concealment of the fact of assistance. In fact and legally, the activity of those volunteers who provide individual assistance to the Armed Forces of Ukraine during a full-scale invasion is illegal, although practice shows that a lot of assistance to the army comes precisely from volunteers who are not the members of any volunteer organizations. The presence of such a prohibition does not meet the requirements of martial law. It is emphasized that the military aggression of Russian Federation forced the legislator to revise the legal norms regulating volunteers’ legal status, social and legal protection. According to the authors, the legislative provisions regarding the impossibility of volunteering individually need to be revised and clarified. Key words: volunteer, volunteer activity, volunteer movement, risks, martial law, military aggression, hostilities, Armed Forces of Ukraine, social guarantees.","PeriodicalId":412555,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Herald of Sivershchyna. Series: Law","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Herald of Sivershchyna. Series: Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32755/sjlaw.2023.02.018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of some aspects of volunteers’ activities under conditions of martial law. It is noted that volunterrs were the first who solved the negative challenges associated with the full-scale invasion of Russian Federation, protected and defended our country’s humanitarian sector. They risked their own lives daily saving the lives of others by evacuating from the hottest places in Ukraine, delivering life support items to the territory where hostilities were taking place. There are different formats of the forms of volunteer activity: from individual to collective ones, from direct participation to remote mode of assistance. It is noted that the war in Ukraine forced society to reconsider volunteers’ practical value and volunteer activities in particular. In modern conditions, taking into account numerous risks to life and health while volunteering, volunteers are one of the most vulnerable and unprotected categories. A clear confirmation of the above is a number of cases that, on the one hand, emphasize the role of volunteers in bringing Ukraine’s victory over the occupiers closer, and on the other hand, demonstrate the riskiness of volunteering. Analyzing the Law of Ukraine “On Volunteering”, attention is focused on contradictions that complicate volunteers’ work and lead to the concealment of the fact of assistance. In fact and legally, the activity of those volunteers who provide individual assistance to the Armed Forces of Ukraine during a full-scale invasion is illegal, although practice shows that a lot of assistance to the army comes precisely from volunteers who are not the members of any volunteer organizations. The presence of such a prohibition does not meet the requirements of martial law. It is emphasized that the military aggression of Russian Federation forced the legislator to revise the legal norms regulating volunteers’ legal status, social and legal protection. According to the authors, the legislative provisions regarding the impossibility of volunteering individually need to be revised and clarified. Key words: volunteer, volunteer activity, volunteer movement, risks, martial law, military aggression, hostilities, Armed Forces of Ukraine, social guarantees.
戒严条件下志愿者活动的一些方面
本文对戒严条件下志愿军活动的几个方面进行了分析。应当指出,志愿人员首先解决了与全面入侵俄罗斯联邦有关的消极挑战,保护和捍卫了我国的人道主义部门。他们每天冒着生命危险,从乌克兰最热的地区撤离,向发生敌对行动的地区运送生命支持物品,拯救他人的生命。志愿活动的形式有不同的形式:从个人到集体,从直接参与到远程援助。值得注意的是,乌克兰战争迫使社会重新考虑志愿者的实际价值,特别是志愿者活动。在现代条件下,考虑到志愿服务对生命和健康的诸多风险,志愿人员是最脆弱和不受保护的类别之一。对上述情况的明确证实是,一些案例一方面强调了志愿人员在使乌克兰更接近于战胜占领者方面的作用,另一方面也证明了志愿人员的危险性。通过对乌克兰《志愿者法》的分析,重点关注了使志愿者工作复杂化、掩盖援助事实的矛盾。事实上,从法律上讲,在全面入侵期间向乌克兰武装部队提供个人援助的志愿人员的活动是非法的,尽管实践表明,向军队提供的许多援助正是来自不是任何志愿组织成员的志愿人员。这种禁令的存在不符合戒严法的要求。委员会强调指出,俄罗斯联邦的军事侵略迫使立法者修改关于志愿人员的法律地位、社会和法律保护的法律规范。作者认为,关于个人志愿活动不可能的立法规定需要修改和澄清。关键词:志愿者,志愿者活动,志愿者运动,风险,戒严令,军事侵略,敌对行动,乌克兰武装力量,社会保障。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信