Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Injury Using an Anterior-Based Muscle-Sparing Approach to the Hip: A Clinical and Cadaveric Analysis with Review of Literature

A. Zuskov, Michael E. Seem, D. Pollock, Maxwell K. Langfitt, T. D. Luo, J. Plate
{"title":"Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Injury Using an Anterior-Based Muscle-Sparing Approach to the Hip: A Clinical and Cadaveric Analysis with Review of Literature","authors":"A. Zuskov, Michael E. Seem, D. Pollock, Maxwell K. Langfitt, T. D. Luo, J. Plate","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1756274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The alternative anterior hip approach between the tensor fascia lata and gluteus medius (the modified Watson-Jones approach, Röttinger approach, anterior-based muscle-sparing [ABMS] approach, and ABLE approach) may decrease the risk of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) palsy. A retrospective case study, systematic literature review, and cadaveric study were performed to assess the risk for LFCN palsy with the ABMS compared with the direct anterior (DA) approach. Consecutive patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) using ABMS were identified and assessed for LFCN palsy. A systematic review of LFCN injury with ABMS and DA approaches was conducted. In four fresh cadavers (eight hips), ABMS and DA approaches were performed and the LFCN identified. The proximity of the LFCN to the fascial incision was measured and compared between ABMS and DA approaches. In 64 consecutive ABMS THA (mean age: 57.3 ± 13.5 years, 42% female, mean body mass index: 30.2 ± 5.3 kg/m2), two hips (3.2%) had an LFCN palsy. In combination with the systematic literature review, the risk of LFCN palsy was less with ABMS (0.3%, 7/2,609 hips) compared with DA (3.1%, 638/20,402 hips, p < 0.001). In eight cadaveric hip dissections, the LFCN was significantly further away from the ABMS fascial incision (mean: 67.6 ± 9.1 mm), compared with the fascial incision of the DA approach (mean: 18.5 ± 3.5 mm, p < 0.0001). The risk of LFCN palsy was found to be 10-fold greater with the DA approach compared with the ABMS approached in this combined retrospective case series and systematic literature review. The anatomic location of the ABMS fascial incision was significantly farther from the LFCN, contributing to the decreased risk of LFCN injury.","PeriodicalId":427844,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Hip Surgery","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Hip Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1756274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The alternative anterior hip approach between the tensor fascia lata and gluteus medius (the modified Watson-Jones approach, Röttinger approach, anterior-based muscle-sparing [ABMS] approach, and ABLE approach) may decrease the risk of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) palsy. A retrospective case study, systematic literature review, and cadaveric study were performed to assess the risk for LFCN palsy with the ABMS compared with the direct anterior (DA) approach. Consecutive patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) using ABMS were identified and assessed for LFCN palsy. A systematic review of LFCN injury with ABMS and DA approaches was conducted. In four fresh cadavers (eight hips), ABMS and DA approaches were performed and the LFCN identified. The proximity of the LFCN to the fascial incision was measured and compared between ABMS and DA approaches. In 64 consecutive ABMS THA (mean age: 57.3 ± 13.5 years, 42% female, mean body mass index: 30.2 ± 5.3 kg/m2), two hips (3.2%) had an LFCN palsy. In combination with the systematic literature review, the risk of LFCN palsy was less with ABMS (0.3%, 7/2,609 hips) compared with DA (3.1%, 638/20,402 hips, p < 0.001). In eight cadaveric hip dissections, the LFCN was significantly further away from the ABMS fascial incision (mean: 67.6 ± 9.1 mm), compared with the fascial incision of the DA approach (mean: 18.5 ± 3.5 mm, p < 0.0001). The risk of LFCN palsy was found to be 10-fold greater with the DA approach compared with the ABMS approached in this combined retrospective case series and systematic literature review. The anatomic location of the ABMS fascial incision was significantly farther from the LFCN, contributing to the decreased risk of LFCN injury.
股骨外侧皮神经损伤采用前路肌肉保留入路:临床和尸体分析与文献回顾
阔筋膜张肌和臀中肌之间的备选髋关节前路入路(改良的Watson-Jones入路、Röttinger入路、前基肌肉保留[ABMS]入路和ABLE入路)可能降低股外侧皮神经(LFCN)麻痹的风险。通过回顾性病例研究、系统文献回顾和尸体研究来评估与直接前路(DA)入路相比,ABMS入路对LFCN麻痹的风险。使用ABMS连续接受全髋关节置换术(THA)的患者被确定并评估LFCN麻痹。系统回顾LFCN受伤的反弹道导弹和DA方法。在4具新鲜尸体(8髋)中,进行了ABMS和DA入路并确定了LFCN。测量LFCN与筋膜切口的接近程度,并比较ABMS和DA入路。在64例连续ABMS THA(平均年龄:57.3±13.5岁,42%为女性,平均体重指数:30.2±5.3 kg/m2)中,2例髋部(3.2%)发生LFCN麻痹。结合系统文献综述,ABMS患者LFCN麻痹的风险(0.3%,7/2,609髋)低于DA患者(3.1%,638/20,402髋,p < 0.001)。在8例尸体髋关节解剖中,与DA入路的筋膜切口(平均:18.5±3.5 mm, p < 0.0001)相比,LFCN距离ABMS筋膜切口明显更远(平均:67.6±9.1 mm)。在回顾性病例系列和系统的文献回顾中,发现DA方法与ABMS方法相比,LFCN麻痹的风险高10倍。的解剖位置反弹道导弹筋膜切口明显远离LFCN,有助于减少LFCN受伤的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信