PIPIL DOCUMENTS LEGALITY AS PROOF OF LAND OWNERSHIP RIGHTS OWNERSHIP IN BALI

Ketut Diana Rista Pradnyadana, Putu Edgar Tanaya
{"title":"PIPIL DOCUMENTS LEGALITY AS PROOF OF LAND OWNERSHIP RIGHTS OWNERSHIP IN BALI","authors":"Ketut Diana Rista Pradnyadana, Putu Edgar Tanaya","doi":"10.55047/polri.v1i4.486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pipil as proof of land ownership is not comparable in strength to a certificate.  Pipil is used as proof of ownership of a land based on the Customary Agrarian Law which later became the source of the formation of the National Agrarian Law which was subsequently ratified by the Basic Agrarian Law of 1960 which was reinforced by Law No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration.  This study aims to find certainty that there is a legal basis for using pipil as proof of ownership rights, to provide information to the public regarding the importance of registering their land with the BPN and as a material consideration for communities who have not changed their proof of land ownership rights to the National Land Agency (BPN).  The method used in this study is a normative method by studying laws and regulations and the results of research and writings from legal circles.  The main topic of discussion is the legal basis for using pipil as proof of land ownership and the factors that form the basis for why there are still people who use pipil.","PeriodicalId":434803,"journal":{"name":"POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v1i4.486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Pipil as proof of land ownership is not comparable in strength to a certificate.  Pipil is used as proof of ownership of a land based on the Customary Agrarian Law which later became the source of the formation of the National Agrarian Law which was subsequently ratified by the Basic Agrarian Law of 1960 which was reinforced by Law No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration.  This study aims to find certainty that there is a legal basis for using pipil as proof of ownership rights, to provide information to the public regarding the importance of registering their land with the BPN and as a material consideration for communities who have not changed their proof of land ownership rights to the National Land Agency (BPN).  The method used in this study is a normative method by studying laws and regulations and the results of research and writings from legal circles.  The main topic of discussion is the legal basis for using pipil as proof of land ownership and the factors that form the basis for why there are still people who use pipil.
Pipil将土地所有权的合法性作为巴厘岛土地所有权的证明
Pipil作为土地所有权的证明在效力上比不上证书。Pipil是根据习惯土地法作为土地所有权的证明,后来成为国家土地法形成的来源,随后由1960年的《基本土地法》批准,并由1997年关于土地登记的第24号法加强。本研究旨在确定是否存在使用pipil作为所有权证明的法律依据,向公众提供有关在BPN登记其土地的重要性的信息,并作为未向国家土地局(BPN)更改其土地所有权证明的社区的重要考虑。本研究采用的方法是通过研究法律法规和法律界的研究成果和著述的规范化方法。讨论的主要议题是使用pipil作为土地所有权证明的法律依据,以及为什么仍然有人使用pipil的基础因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信