Quantile Based Statistical Failure Analysis for Wafer Level Test Comparison

Jeongwon Bae, Minjoo Kim, Jongbum Lee, Myunghoon Oak, Choongsun Park, Sunghun Park, Sungsoo Yim, Hee-Il Hong, Jooyoung Lee
{"title":"Quantile Based Statistical Failure Analysis for Wafer Level Test Comparison","authors":"Jeongwon Bae, Minjoo Kim, Jongbum Lee, Myunghoon Oak, Choongsun Park, Sunghun Park, Sungsoo Yim, Hee-Il Hong, Jooyoung Lee","doi":"10.31399/asm.cp.istfa2021p0263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In semiconductor manufacturing or testing, when changing the items such as parts, materials or equipment, many engineers use the equivalence test to hedge the risk of new process. Equivalence Test Procedure (ETP) uses a modified algorithm of Cohen's d and F-ratio for comparing two test samples when it evaluates the statistical allowance in the second stage. These logics are estimated under the assumption of normality for the underlying population. However, there are many wafer level test items such as Fail Bit Count (FBC) where their populations are non-normal distribution. Because the standard deviation in the two algorithms is over-estimated in wafer level test distribution, the two algorithms fail to represent the size of difference for the two samples exactly. Therefore, we introduce quantile comparison equivalence criteria (QCEC) which is robust to overall data distribution and outlier-free. To instruct engineers about the change cause of the data distribution, we create new statistics called ‘Center or Dispersion’ (CoD) that distinguish between center difference and dispersion difference. For practical application, we conduct the case study on Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) FBC data. For wafer level test 199 items, it is found that the QCEC's accuracy improves by 20% compared to the accuracy of Cohen's d. It also shows a 75% improvement over the accuracy of the F-ratio.","PeriodicalId":188323,"journal":{"name":"ISTFA 2021: Conference Proceedings from the 47th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis","volume":"136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISTFA 2021: Conference Proceedings from the 47th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31399/asm.cp.istfa2021p0263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In semiconductor manufacturing or testing, when changing the items such as parts, materials or equipment, many engineers use the equivalence test to hedge the risk of new process. Equivalence Test Procedure (ETP) uses a modified algorithm of Cohen's d and F-ratio for comparing two test samples when it evaluates the statistical allowance in the second stage. These logics are estimated under the assumption of normality for the underlying population. However, there are many wafer level test items such as Fail Bit Count (FBC) where their populations are non-normal distribution. Because the standard deviation in the two algorithms is over-estimated in wafer level test distribution, the two algorithms fail to represent the size of difference for the two samples exactly. Therefore, we introduce quantile comparison equivalence criteria (QCEC) which is robust to overall data distribution and outlier-free. To instruct engineers about the change cause of the data distribution, we create new statistics called ‘Center or Dispersion’ (CoD) that distinguish between center difference and dispersion difference. For practical application, we conduct the case study on Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) FBC data. For wafer level test 199 items, it is found that the QCEC's accuracy improves by 20% compared to the accuracy of Cohen's d. It also shows a 75% improvement over the accuracy of the F-ratio.
基于分位数的晶圆级测试比较统计失效分析
在半导体制造或测试中,当改变零件、材料或设备等项目时,许多工程师使用等效测试来对冲新工艺的风险。等效检验程序(ETP)在第二阶段评估统计容差时,使用一种改进的科恩d和f比算法来比较两个测试样本。这些逻辑是在基础总体的正态假设下估计的。然而,有许多晶圆级测试项目,如失败位计数(FBC),其总体是非正态分布。由于两种算法的标准差在晶圆级测试分布中被过高估计,这两种算法不能准确地表示两个样本的差异大小。因此,我们引入了对整体数据分布具有鲁棒性和无异常值的分位数比较等效准则(QCEC)。为了指导工程师了解数据分布的变化原因,我们创建了新的统计数据,称为“中心或分散”(CoD),以区分中心差和分散差。在实际应用中,我们对动态随机存取存储器(DRAM) FBC数据进行了案例研究。对于晶圆级测试199项,发现QCEC的准确度比Cohen的准确度提高了20%。它也显示了比f比准确度提高了75%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信