Global Social Media Ethics and the Responsibility of Journalism

D. Craig
{"title":"Global Social Media Ethics and the Responsibility of Journalism","authors":"D. Craig","doi":"10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social media have amplified and accelerated the ethical challenges that communicators, professional and otherwise, face worldwide. The work of ethical journalism, with a priority of truthful communication, offers a paradigm case for examining the broader challenges in the global social media network. The evolution of digital technologies and the attendant expansion of the communication network pose ethical difficulties for journalists connected with increased speed and volume of information, a diminished place in the network, and the cross-border nature of information flow. These challenges are exacerbated by intentional manipulation of social media, human-run or automated, in many countries including internal suppression by authoritarian regimes and foreign influence operations to spread misinformation. In addition, structural characteristics of social media platforms’ filtering and recommending algorithms pose ethical challenges for journalism and its role in fostering public discourse on social and political issues, although a number of studies have called aspects of the “filter bubble” hypothesis into question.\n Research in multiple countries, mostly in North America and Europe, has examined social media practices in journalism, including two issues central to social media ethics—verification and transparency—but ethical implications have seldom been discussed explicitly in the context of ethical theory. Since the 1980s and 1990s, scholarship focused on normative theorizing in relation to journalism has matured and become more multicultural and global. Scholars have articulated a number of ethical frameworks that could deepen analysis of the challenges of social media in the practice of journalism. However, the explicit implications of these frameworks for social media have largely gone unaddressed. A large topic of discussion in media ethics theory has been the possibility of universal or common principles globally, including a broadening of discussion of moral universals or common ground in media ethics beyond Western perspectives that have historically dominated the scholarship.\n In order to advance media ethics scholarship in the 21st-century environment of globally networked communication, in which journalists work among a host of other actors (well-intentioned, ill-intentioned, and automated), it is important for researchers to apply existing media ethics frameworks to social media practices. This application needs to address the challenges that social media create when crossing cultures, the common difficulties they pose worldwide for journalistic verification practices, and the responsibility of journalists for countering misinformation from malicious actors.\n It is also important to the further development of media ethics scholarship that future normative theorizing in the field—whether developing new frameworks or redeveloping current ones—consider journalistic responsibilities in relation to social media in the context of both the human and nonhuman actors in the communication network. The developing scholarly literature on the ethics of algorithms bears further attention from media ethics scholars for the ways it may provide perspectives that are complementary to existing media ethics frameworks that have focused on human actors and organizations.","PeriodicalId":307235,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication","volume":"193 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social media have amplified and accelerated the ethical challenges that communicators, professional and otherwise, face worldwide. The work of ethical journalism, with a priority of truthful communication, offers a paradigm case for examining the broader challenges in the global social media network. The evolution of digital technologies and the attendant expansion of the communication network pose ethical difficulties for journalists connected with increased speed and volume of information, a diminished place in the network, and the cross-border nature of information flow. These challenges are exacerbated by intentional manipulation of social media, human-run or automated, in many countries including internal suppression by authoritarian regimes and foreign influence operations to spread misinformation. In addition, structural characteristics of social media platforms’ filtering and recommending algorithms pose ethical challenges for journalism and its role in fostering public discourse on social and political issues, although a number of studies have called aspects of the “filter bubble” hypothesis into question. Research in multiple countries, mostly in North America and Europe, has examined social media practices in journalism, including two issues central to social media ethics—verification and transparency—but ethical implications have seldom been discussed explicitly in the context of ethical theory. Since the 1980s and 1990s, scholarship focused on normative theorizing in relation to journalism has matured and become more multicultural and global. Scholars have articulated a number of ethical frameworks that could deepen analysis of the challenges of social media in the practice of journalism. However, the explicit implications of these frameworks for social media have largely gone unaddressed. A large topic of discussion in media ethics theory has been the possibility of universal or common principles globally, including a broadening of discussion of moral universals or common ground in media ethics beyond Western perspectives that have historically dominated the scholarship. In order to advance media ethics scholarship in the 21st-century environment of globally networked communication, in which journalists work among a host of other actors (well-intentioned, ill-intentioned, and automated), it is important for researchers to apply existing media ethics frameworks to social media practices. This application needs to address the challenges that social media create when crossing cultures, the common difficulties they pose worldwide for journalistic verification practices, and the responsibility of journalists for countering misinformation from malicious actors. It is also important to the further development of media ethics scholarship that future normative theorizing in the field—whether developing new frameworks or redeveloping current ones—consider journalistic responsibilities in relation to social media in the context of both the human and nonhuman actors in the communication network. The developing scholarly literature on the ethics of algorithms bears further attention from media ethics scholars for the ways it may provide perspectives that are complementary to existing media ethics frameworks that have focused on human actors and organizations.
全球社交媒体伦理与新闻责任
社交媒体放大并加速了全球传播者(无论是专业传播者还是其他传播者)面临的道德挑战。道德新闻的工作,以真实的沟通为优先,为研究全球社交媒体网络中更广泛的挑战提供了一个范例案例。数字技术的发展和随之而来的通信网络的扩张给记者带来了道德上的困难,这些困难与信息的速度和数量增加、在网络中的地位下降以及信息流的跨境性质有关。在许多国家,人为或自动操纵社交媒体,包括威权政权的内部镇压和传播错误信息的外国影响行动,加剧了这些挑战。此外,社交媒体平台过滤和推荐算法的结构特征对新闻业及其在促进公众讨论社会和政治问题方面的作用提出了伦理挑战,尽管一些研究对“过滤泡沫”假说的某些方面提出了质疑。在多个国家,主要是在北美和欧洲,研究了新闻中的社交媒体实践,包括社交媒体伦理的两个核心问题——验证和透明度——但伦理含义很少在伦理理论的背景下被明确讨论。自20世纪80年代和90年代以来,专注于新闻规范性理论化的学术已经成熟,并变得更加多元文化和全球化。学者们已经明确提出了一些道德框架,这些框架可以加深对新闻实践中社交媒体挑战的分析。然而,这些框架对社交媒体的明确影响在很大程度上尚未得到解决。媒体伦理理论讨论的一个大主题是全球普遍或共同原则的可能性,包括对媒体伦理道德的普遍或共同基础的讨论的扩大,超出了历史上主导学术的西方观点。为了在21世纪的全球网络传播环境中推进媒体伦理研究,在这个环境中,记者与许多其他行为者(善意的、恶意的和自动化的)一起工作,研究人员必须将现有的媒体伦理框架应用于社交媒体实践。这一应用程序需要解决社交媒体在跨文化时带来的挑战,解决它们在全球范围内给新闻核查实践带来的共同困难,以及记者应对恶意行为者的错误信息的责任。对于媒体伦理学术的进一步发展,未来在该领域的规范性理论——无论是开发新框架还是重新开发现有框架——都要考虑在传播网络中人类和非人类行动者的背景下与社交媒体相关的新闻责任,这一点也很重要。关于算法伦理的学术文献的发展受到媒体伦理学者的进一步关注,因为它可能提供的观点与现有的关注人类行为者和组织的媒体伦理框架相辅相成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信