Validation of boreal summer tropical–extratropical causal links in seasonal forecasts

G. di Capua, D. Coumou, B. van den Hurk, A. Weisheimer, A. Turner, R. Donner
{"title":"Validation of boreal summer tropical–extratropical causal links in seasonal forecasts","authors":"G. di Capua, D. Coumou, B. van den Hurk, A. Weisheimer, A. Turner, R. Donner","doi":"10.5194/wcd-4-701-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Much of the forecast skill in the mid-latitudes on seasonal\ntimescales originates from deep convection in the tropical belt. For boreal\nsummer, such tropical–extratropical teleconnections are less well understood\ncompared to winter. Here we validate the representation of boreal summer\ntropical–extratropical teleconnections in a general circulation model in\ncomparison with observational data. To characterise variability between\ntropical convective activity and mid-latitude circulation, we identify the\nSouth Asian monsoon (SAM)–circumglobal teleconnection (CGT) pattern and\nthe western North Pacific summer monsoon (WNPSM)–North Pacific high (NPH)\npairs as the leading modes of tropical–extratropical coupled variability in\nboth reanalysis (ERA5) and seasonal forecast (SEAS5) data. We calculate\ncausal maps based on the Peter and Clark momentary conditional independence\n(PCMCI) causal discovery algorithm, which identifies causal links in a 2D\nfield, to show the causal effect of each of these patterns on circulation\nand convection in the Northern Hemisphere. The spatial patterns and signs of\nthe causal links in SEAS5 closely resemble those seen in ERA5, independent\nof the initialisation date of SEAS5. By performing a subsampling experiment\n(over time), we analyse the strengths of causal links in SEAS5 and show that\nthey are qualitatively weaker than those in ERA5. We identify those regions\nfor which SEAS5 data well reproduce ERA5 values, e.g. the southeastern USA,\nand highlight those where the bias is more prominent, e.g. North Africa and\nin general tropical regions. We demonstrate that different El Niño–Southern Oscillation phases have only a marginal effect on the strength of\nthese links. Finally, we discuss the potential role of model mean-state\nbiases in explaining differences between SEAS5 and ERA5 causal links.\n","PeriodicalId":383272,"journal":{"name":"Weather and Climate Dynamics","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weather and Climate Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-701-2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract. Much of the forecast skill in the mid-latitudes on seasonal timescales originates from deep convection in the tropical belt. For boreal summer, such tropical–extratropical teleconnections are less well understood compared to winter. Here we validate the representation of boreal summer tropical–extratropical teleconnections in a general circulation model in comparison with observational data. To characterise variability between tropical convective activity and mid-latitude circulation, we identify the South Asian monsoon (SAM)–circumglobal teleconnection (CGT) pattern and the western North Pacific summer monsoon (WNPSM)–North Pacific high (NPH) pairs as the leading modes of tropical–extratropical coupled variability in both reanalysis (ERA5) and seasonal forecast (SEAS5) data. We calculate causal maps based on the Peter and Clark momentary conditional independence (PCMCI) causal discovery algorithm, which identifies causal links in a 2D field, to show the causal effect of each of these patterns on circulation and convection in the Northern Hemisphere. The spatial patterns and signs of the causal links in SEAS5 closely resemble those seen in ERA5, independent of the initialisation date of SEAS5. By performing a subsampling experiment (over time), we analyse the strengths of causal links in SEAS5 and show that they are qualitatively weaker than those in ERA5. We identify those regions for which SEAS5 data well reproduce ERA5 values, e.g. the southeastern USA, and highlight those where the bias is more prominent, e.g. North Africa and in general tropical regions. We demonstrate that different El Niño–Southern Oscillation phases have only a marginal effect on the strength of these links. Finally, we discuss the potential role of model mean-state biases in explaining differences between SEAS5 and ERA5 causal links.
季节性预报中北方夏季热带-温带因果关系的验证
摘要在季节时间尺度上,中纬度地区的大部分预报技能来自于热带的深对流。与冬季相比,对于北方夏季,这种热带-温带遥相关还不太清楚。在这里,我们通过与观测资料的比较,验证了一般环流模式中北方夏季热带-温带遥相关的表示。为了表征热带对流活动和中纬度环流之间的变率,我们在再分析(ERA5)和季节预报(SEAS5)数据中确定南亚季风(SAM) -环全球远相关(CGT)型和北太平洋夏季风(WNPSM) -北太平洋高压(NPH)对作为热带-温带耦合变率的主要模态。我们基于Peter和Clark瞬时条件独立(PCMCI)因果发现算法计算因果图,该算法识别二维场中的因果联系,以显示每种模式对北半球环流和对流的因果影响。与季节5的初始化日期无关,季节5的空间模式和因果联系的迹象与ERA5非常相似。通过执行子抽样实验(随着时间的推移),我们分析了季5的因果联系的强度,并表明它们在质量上比ERA5弱。我们确定了那些SEAS5数据能很好地再现ERA5值的地区,如美国东南部,并突出了那些偏差更明显的地区,如北非和一般热带地区。我们证明了不同的El Niño-Southern振荡相位对这些链接的强度只有一个边际影响。最后,我们讨论了模型平均状态偏差在解释SEAS5和ERA5因果关系差异中的潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信