Performance Evaluation of Dynamic Routing Protocols

Waleed Iftikhar
{"title":"Performance Evaluation of Dynamic Routing Protocols","authors":"Waleed Iftikhar","doi":"10.54692/lgurjcsit.2020.0401141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Routing protocols are an essential component while performing routing. Majority of the researches put stress on the analysis of the security of IPv6 routing protocols as a future research work. In case of DB query response time, EIGRPv6 did not perform well as compare to other two routing protocols. While for voice and video, jitter, packet end-to-end delay, EIGRPv6 performed best among other routing protocols. Their evaluation involved four pairs of scenarios and each pair dedicated to respective routing protocols to be analyzed. Finally, their results also predicted that communication between ISIS and OSPF routing protocols is quite noticeable. The major purpose of their research was to figure out the best possible combined solution of routing protocols in a complex scenario to provide a seamless flow of communication. While, in the combined network, RIP-OSPF combination had a low CPU utilization in comparison to EIGRP-OSPF combination. This paper will conduct a performance evaluation and analysis of routing protocols, RIP, OSPF, EIGRP and IGRP using different performance metrics. In a  situation where there are frequent network topological changes, RIP and IGRP are the least suited routing protocols. While EIGRP and OSPF are the best suited routing protocols in a changing network environment. OSPF can be a better choice than EIGRP considering transmission cost and router overhead, while EIGRP performed best in terms of convergence, utilization, delay and throughput. Hence it becomes really difficult to select among OPSF and EIGRP. Future research can be based on selecting a routing protocol among OSPF","PeriodicalId":197260,"journal":{"name":"Lahore Garrison University Research Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lahore Garrison University Research Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54692/lgurjcsit.2020.0401141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Routing protocols are an essential component while performing routing. Majority of the researches put stress on the analysis of the security of IPv6 routing protocols as a future research work. In case of DB query response time, EIGRPv6 did not perform well as compare to other two routing protocols. While for voice and video, jitter, packet end-to-end delay, EIGRPv6 performed best among other routing protocols. Their evaluation involved four pairs of scenarios and each pair dedicated to respective routing protocols to be analyzed. Finally, their results also predicted that communication between ISIS and OSPF routing protocols is quite noticeable. The major purpose of their research was to figure out the best possible combined solution of routing protocols in a complex scenario to provide a seamless flow of communication. While, in the combined network, RIP-OSPF combination had a low CPU utilization in comparison to EIGRP-OSPF combination. This paper will conduct a performance evaluation and analysis of routing protocols, RIP, OSPF, EIGRP and IGRP using different performance metrics. In a  situation where there are frequent network topological changes, RIP and IGRP are the least suited routing protocols. While EIGRP and OSPF are the best suited routing protocols in a changing network environment. OSPF can be a better choice than EIGRP considering transmission cost and router overhead, while EIGRP performed best in terms of convergence, utilization, delay and throughput. Hence it becomes really difficult to select among OPSF and EIGRP. Future research can be based on selecting a routing protocol among OSPF
动态路由协议的性能评估
路由协议是执行路由时必不可少的组件。大多数研究都把对IPv6路由协议的安全性分析作为未来的研究工作。在DB查询响应时间方面,与其他两种路由协议相比,EIGRPv6的性能并不好。而对于语音和视频、抖动、数据包端到端延迟,EIGRPv6在其他路由协议中表现最好。他们的评估涉及四对场景,每对场景专门用于要分析的各自路由协议。最后,他们的结果也预测了ISIS和OSPF路由协议之间的通信是相当明显的。他们研究的主要目的是找出在复杂场景中路由协议的最佳组合解决方案,以提供无缝的通信流。而在组合网络中,RIP-OSPF组合比EIGRP-OSPF组合的CPU利用率低。本文将使用不同的性能指标对路由协议RIP、OSPF、EIGRP和IGRP进行性能评估和分析。在网络拓扑变化频繁的情况下,RIP和IGRP是最不适合的路由协议。而EIGRP和OSPF是最适合在不断变化的网络环境中的路由协议。考虑到传输成本和路由器开销,OSPF可以比EIGRP更好,而EIGRP在收敛性、利用率、时延和吞吐量方面表现最好。因此,在OPSF和EIGRP之间进行选择变得非常困难。未来的研究可以基于在OSPF中选择路由协议
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信