A Study on Classifications of Useful Customer Reviews by Applying Text Mining Approach

H. Lee
{"title":"A Study on Classifications of Useful Customer Reviews by Applying Text Mining Approach","authors":"H. Lee","doi":"10.9716/KITS.2015.14.4.159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Submitted:July 20, 2015 1 st Revision:September 20, 2015 Accepted:September 29, 2015*본 연구는 2013년 교육부의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구이며(NRF-2013S1A5A2A01018177), 2014년도 가톨릭대학교의 교비연구비의 지원도 받았음. ** 가톨릭대학교 경영학부 Customer reviews are one of the important sources for purchase decision makings in online stores. Online stores have tried to provide useful reviews in product pages to custom ers. To assess the usefulness of customer reviews before other users have voted enough on the reviews, diverse as pects of reviews were utilized in prevous studies. Style and semantic information were utilized in many studies. This study aims to test diverse alogrithms and datasets for ide ntifying a proper classification method and threshold to classify useful reviews. In particular, most researches util ized ratio type helpfulness index as Amazon.com used. However, there is another type of usefulness index utilized in TripAdviser.com or Yelp.com, count type helpfulness index. There was no proper threshold to classify useful reviews yet fo r count type helpfulness index. This study used reivews and their usefulness votes on restaurnats from Yelp.com to devi se diverse datasets and applied text mining approaches to classify useful reviews. Random Forest, SVM, and GLMNET showed the greater values of accuracy than other approaches.","PeriodicalId":272384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korea society of IT services","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korea society of IT services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9716/KITS.2015.14.4.159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Submitted:July 20, 2015 1 st Revision:September 20, 2015 Accepted:September 29, 2015*본 연구는 2013년 교육부의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구이며(NRF-2013S1A5A2A01018177), 2014년도 가톨릭대학교의 교비연구비의 지원도 받았음. ** 가톨릭대학교 경영학부 Customer reviews are one of the important sources for purchase decision makings in online stores. Online stores have tried to provide useful reviews in product pages to custom ers. To assess the usefulness of customer reviews before other users have voted enough on the reviews, diverse as pects of reviews were utilized in prevous studies. Style and semantic information were utilized in many studies. This study aims to test diverse alogrithms and datasets for ide ntifying a proper classification method and threshold to classify useful reviews. In particular, most researches util ized ratio type helpfulness index as Amazon.com used. However, there is another type of usefulness index utilized in TripAdviser.com or Yelp.com, count type helpfulness index. There was no proper threshold to classify useful reviews yet fo r count type helpfulness index. This study used reivews and their usefulness votes on restaurnats from Yelp.com to devi se diverse datasets and applied text mining approaches to classify useful reviews. Random Forest, SVM, and GLMNET showed the greater values of accuracy than other approaches.
基于文本挖掘方法的有用顾客评论分类研究
摘要提交:2015年7月20日1 st修订:9月20日,2015年接受:9月29日,2015 *본연구는2013년교육부의재원으로한국연구재단의지원을받아수행된연구이며(nrf - 2013 s1a5a2a01018177), 2014년도가톨릭대학교의교비연구비의지원도받았음。** **톨网商评论是网上商店购买决策的重要来源之一。网上商店试图在产品页面上为顾客提供有用的评论。为了在其他用户对评论进行足够的投票之前评估客户评论的有用性,在以前的研究中使用了不同的评论方面。文体和语义信息在许多研究中都得到了应用。本研究旨在测试不同的算法和数据集,以确定适当的分类方法和阈值来分类有用的评论。特别是,大多数研究都像Amazon.com一样使用比率型帮助指数。然而,在TripAdviser.com或Yelp.com上还有另一种有用性指数,计数型有用性指数。对于计数型有用性指数,还没有合适的阈值来分类有用的评论。本研究使用Yelp.com上的评论及其对餐馆的有用性投票来设计不同的数据集,并应用文本挖掘方法对有用的评论进行分类。随机森林、支持向量机和GLMNET的准确率高于其他方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信