Effects of psychological capital and managerial attitudes on the relationship between budgetary participation and performance

Larissa Degenhart, V. C. S. Zonatto, C. Lavarda
{"title":"Effects of psychological capital and managerial attitudes on the relationship between budgetary participation and performance","authors":"Larissa Degenhart, V. C. S. Zonatto, C. Lavarda","doi":"10.1590/1808-057x202113790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study analyzes the effects of psychological capital and managerial attitudes on the relationship between budgetary participation and management performance in budgeting activities. The study addresses a gap that exists in the budgeting research, tackling the effects of individuals’ mental states and behaviors on the relationship between budgetary participation and management performance in an integrated way. The interactive effects of cognitive and personal, behavioral, and environmental factors enable us to understand the factors present within the budgetary context that influence the relationship between budgetary participation and management performance, which provides an explanation for the conflicting results found in the literature, denoting in which conditions the effects of participation on performance can be obtained. The research innovates by evaluating, based on an interactionist approach, predictive factors for management performance within the budgetary context, contemplating the analysis of cognitive and personal (psychological capital), behavioral (managerial attitudes), and environmental (budgetary participation) factors, providing an explanation for the effects of budgetary participation on management performance in budgeting activities. A survey was conducted with 245 controller professionals from industries in the South Region of Brazil, chosen using the LinkedIn social network, and the data were analyzed via structural equation modeling (SEM). This revealed the positive joint indirect effects of psychological capital and of managerial attitudes on the relationship between budgetary participation and performance. The results converge with the social cognitive theory (SCT) approach, as it can be inferred that cognitive and personal aspects influence human decisions and the level of effort employed by managers in activities carried out within the budgetary context. The results offer support for organizations to direct resources toward organizational practices that seek to improve managers’ positive mental states, which influence behavioral factors and their job performance.","PeriodicalId":251378,"journal":{"name":"Revista Contabilidade & Finanças","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Contabilidade & Finanças","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x202113790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study analyzes the effects of psychological capital and managerial attitudes on the relationship between budgetary participation and management performance in budgeting activities. The study addresses a gap that exists in the budgeting research, tackling the effects of individuals’ mental states and behaviors on the relationship between budgetary participation and management performance in an integrated way. The interactive effects of cognitive and personal, behavioral, and environmental factors enable us to understand the factors present within the budgetary context that influence the relationship between budgetary participation and management performance, which provides an explanation for the conflicting results found in the literature, denoting in which conditions the effects of participation on performance can be obtained. The research innovates by evaluating, based on an interactionist approach, predictive factors for management performance within the budgetary context, contemplating the analysis of cognitive and personal (psychological capital), behavioral (managerial attitudes), and environmental (budgetary participation) factors, providing an explanation for the effects of budgetary participation on management performance in budgeting activities. A survey was conducted with 245 controller professionals from industries in the South Region of Brazil, chosen using the LinkedIn social network, and the data were analyzed via structural equation modeling (SEM). This revealed the positive joint indirect effects of psychological capital and of managerial attitudes on the relationship between budgetary participation and performance. The results converge with the social cognitive theory (SCT) approach, as it can be inferred that cognitive and personal aspects influence human decisions and the level of effort employed by managers in activities carried out within the budgetary context. The results offer support for organizations to direct resources toward organizational practices that seek to improve managers’ positive mental states, which influence behavioral factors and their job performance.
心理资本和管理态度对预算参与与绩效关系的影响
摘要本研究分析了心理资本和管理态度对预算参与与管理绩效关系的影响。本研究解决了预算研究中存在的一个空白,以综合的方式解决了个体心理状态和行为对预算参与与管理绩效关系的影响。认知因素、个人因素、行为因素和环境因素的相互作用使我们能够理解预算环境中存在的影响预算参与与管理绩效之间关系的因素,这为文献中发现的相互矛盾的结果提供了解释,表明参与对绩效的影响可以在哪些条件下获得。本研究的创新之处是,基于互动主义的方法,评估预算背景下管理绩效的预测因素,考虑对认知和个人(心理资本)、行为(管理态度)和环境(预算参与)因素的分析,为预算活动中预算参与对管理绩效的影响提供了解释。我们通过LinkedIn社交网络对巴西南部地区245名控制员专业人士进行了调查,并通过结构方程模型(SEM)对数据进行了分析。这揭示了心理资本和管理态度对预算参与和绩效之间关系的积极联合间接影响。结果与社会认知理论(SCT)方法一致,因为可以推断,认知和个人方面影响人的决策以及管理人员在预算范围内开展的活动中所采用的努力水平。研究结果为组织将资源导向旨在改善管理者积极心理状态的组织实践提供了支持,积极心理状态会影响行为因素和他们的工作绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信