Toward an Enhanced Level of Corporate Governance: Tech Committees as a Game Changer for the Board of Directors

Maria Lillà Montagnani, Maria Lucia Passador
{"title":"Toward an Enhanced Level of Corporate Governance: Tech Committees as a Game Changer for the Board of Directors","authors":"Maria Lillà Montagnani, Maria Lucia Passador","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3728946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although tech committees are increasingly being included in the functioning of the board of directors, a gap exists in the current literature on board committees, as it tends to focus on traditional board committees, such as nominating, auditing or remuneration ones. Therefore, this article performs an empirical analysis of tech committees adopted by North American and European listed companies in 2019 in terms of their composition, characteristics and functions. The aim of the study is to understand what “technology” really stands for in the “tech committees” label within the board, or – to phrase it differently – to ascertain what tech committees do and whether and how they enrich the current level of corporate governance. As a result, we find that even if AI has already entered the boardroom, it has not entered the “corporate governance architecture” of companies: directors employ AI, but there is no internal procedure telling them how to effectively, efficiently and responsibly leverage its potentials and how to minimize the risks arising from its employment. Hence, to address the current lack of AI governance at the corporate level, we propose a two-layer model that pivots around tech committees and grants them a key role. In a nutshell, the article, by providing the first empirical attempt to investigate what tech committees do, unveils what they are not doing, and outlines what they should be doing instead.","PeriodicalId":354906,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance: Comparative eJournal","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance: Comparative eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3728946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Although tech committees are increasingly being included in the functioning of the board of directors, a gap exists in the current literature on board committees, as it tends to focus on traditional board committees, such as nominating, auditing or remuneration ones. Therefore, this article performs an empirical analysis of tech committees adopted by North American and European listed companies in 2019 in terms of their composition, characteristics and functions. The aim of the study is to understand what “technology” really stands for in the “tech committees” label within the board, or – to phrase it differently – to ascertain what tech committees do and whether and how they enrich the current level of corporate governance. As a result, we find that even if AI has already entered the boardroom, it has not entered the “corporate governance architecture” of companies: directors employ AI, but there is no internal procedure telling them how to effectively, efficiently and responsibly leverage its potentials and how to minimize the risks arising from its employment. Hence, to address the current lack of AI governance at the corporate level, we propose a two-layer model that pivots around tech committees and grants them a key role. In a nutshell, the article, by providing the first empirical attempt to investigate what tech committees do, unveils what they are not doing, and outlines what they should be doing instead.
提高公司治理水平:技术委员会作为董事会的游戏规则改变者
尽管科技委员会越来越多地被纳入董事会的职能,但目前关于董事会委员会的文献存在空白,因为它往往侧重于传统的董事会委员会,如提名、审计或薪酬委员会。因此,本文对2019年北美和欧洲上市公司采用的技术委员会的组成、特点和职能进行了实证分析。这项研究的目的是了解“技术”在董事会内部的“技术委员会”标签中真正代表什么,或者——换一种说法——确定技术委员会做什么,以及它们是否以及如何丰富了当前的公司治理水平。因此,我们发现,即使人工智能已经进入董事会,它也没有进入公司的“公司治理架构”:董事们使用人工智能,但没有内部程序告诉他们如何有效、高效和负责任地发挥其潜力,以及如何将使用人工智能带来的风险降至最低。因此,为了解决目前企业层面缺乏人工智能治理的问题,我们提出了一个两层模型,该模型以技术委员会为中心,并赋予它们关键作用。简而言之,这篇文章通过提供第一次实证尝试来调查技术委员会做了什么,揭示了他们没有做什么,并概述了他们应该做什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信