Entangled Colonialisms between Belgium, Congo and the Amazon: The Perspective of Brazilian Diplomats in Brussels (1895-1911)

J. Schreurs
{"title":"Entangled Colonialisms between Belgium, Congo and the Amazon: The Perspective of Brazilian Diplomats in Brussels (1895-1911)","authors":"J. Schreurs","doi":"10.1353/cch.2023.a903579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Mention the period of high imperialism (1885-1914) and historians think of the Scramble for Africa. Yet, at the same time across the Atlantic, another scramble was reaching its pinnacle: the one for the Amazon. The partition of Africa has eclipsed the latter in historiography, thus also obliterating the connections that existed between both. This is not exceptional. Daniel Hedinger and Nadin Heé argue that many transimperial connections remain obscured due to the scholarly tendency of \"nationalizing\" imperial histories. What often gets lost are marginalized and in-between imperial histories. This article investigates one such case establishing connections between the African and the Amazonian scramble: the Brazilian diplomatic position on the Belgian colonization of Congo in relation to the Belgian colonial-commercial involvement in the Amazon, more specifically, in the Acre Crisis (1899-1903). I argue that Brazilian diplomatic actors in Brussels and Rio de Janeiro entangled different forms of colonialism across the Atlantic. These entanglements are important to analyze in order to understand how they shaped and altered the notion of colonial related terminology.","PeriodicalId":278323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Colonialism and Colonial History","volume":"145 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Colonialism and Colonial History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cch.2023.a903579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Mention the period of high imperialism (1885-1914) and historians think of the Scramble for Africa. Yet, at the same time across the Atlantic, another scramble was reaching its pinnacle: the one for the Amazon. The partition of Africa has eclipsed the latter in historiography, thus also obliterating the connections that existed between both. This is not exceptional. Daniel Hedinger and Nadin Heé argue that many transimperial connections remain obscured due to the scholarly tendency of "nationalizing" imperial histories. What often gets lost are marginalized and in-between imperial histories. This article investigates one such case establishing connections between the African and the Amazonian scramble: the Brazilian diplomatic position on the Belgian colonization of Congo in relation to the Belgian colonial-commercial involvement in the Amazon, more specifically, in the Acre Crisis (1899-1903). I argue that Brazilian diplomatic actors in Brussels and Rio de Janeiro entangled different forms of colonialism across the Atlantic. These entanglements are important to analyze in order to understand how they shaped and altered the notion of colonial related terminology.
比利时、刚果和亚马逊之间纠缠不清的殖民主义:布鲁塞尔巴西外交官的视角(1895-1911)
摘要:提到高度帝国主义时期(1885-1914),历史学家们就会想到非洲争夺战。然而,与此同时,在大西洋彼岸,另一场争夺达到了顶峰:对亚马逊的争夺。非洲的分治使后者在史学上黯然失色,因此也抹杀了两者之间存在的联系。这并不例外。丹尼尔·海丁格和纳丁·海格认为,由于帝国历史“国家化”的学术倾向,许多跨帝国的联系仍然模糊不清。经常被遗忘的是被边缘化的和介于两者之间的帝国历史。本文调查了一个建立非洲和亚马逊争夺之间联系的案例:巴西对比利时殖民刚果的外交立场,与比利时在亚马逊的殖民商业参与有关,更具体地说,在阿克危机中(1899-1903)。我认为,在布鲁塞尔和里约热内卢的巴西外交行动者与大西洋彼岸的不同形式的殖民主义纠缠在一起。为了理解它们是如何塑造和改变殖民地相关术语的概念,分析这些纠缠是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信