{"title":"Negotiating the People's Capital Revisited","authors":"S. Estreicher","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1837437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Editor's Note: What follows is the second part of an unofficial transcript of an off-the-record conversation among three of the labor movement's leading strategists. (The first installment appeared under the title “Strategy for Labor,” 22 J. Labor Research 569 (Summer 2001), and has been updated as “Strategy for Labor Revisited,” available www.ssrn.com). This second meeting was also convened by C, or \"cooperationist,\" who had been for over ten years the president of a local union, part of a major industrial union, representing 3,000 employees who had been hired to staff a new manufacturing plant in a Southern town (\"Newplant\"). Newplant had been widely touted as a breakthrough in U.S. labor-management relations because it was consciously designed to promote greater participation of production and maintenance workers in business decisions and a “partnership” role role for union officials alongside traditional management officials. In bitterly contested local elections last year, C was voted out of office and now serves in a staff capacity at the AFL-CI0. A, or \"adversarialist,\" perhaps surprisingly a longstanding friend of C, is the research director of another industrial union. A was very active in the Students for A Democratic Society in the 1960s, and after graduating from Oberlin College began his career as a labor organizer, working for a succession of unions that had been active in the McGovern-Kucinich wing of the Democratic Party. S, or \"stay the course,\" is the highly respected chief of staff for a national union representing government workers. Section headings and parenthetical references are supplied by the editor and do not appear in the original transcript.","PeriodicalId":309648,"journal":{"name":"Hofstra Labor and Employment Law Journal","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hofstra Labor and Employment Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1837437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Editor's Note: What follows is the second part of an unofficial transcript of an off-the-record conversation among three of the labor movement's leading strategists. (The first installment appeared under the title “Strategy for Labor,” 22 J. Labor Research 569 (Summer 2001), and has been updated as “Strategy for Labor Revisited,” available www.ssrn.com). This second meeting was also convened by C, or "cooperationist," who had been for over ten years the president of a local union, part of a major industrial union, representing 3,000 employees who had been hired to staff a new manufacturing plant in a Southern town ("Newplant"). Newplant had been widely touted as a breakthrough in U.S. labor-management relations because it was consciously designed to promote greater participation of production and maintenance workers in business decisions and a “partnership” role role for union officials alongside traditional management officials. In bitterly contested local elections last year, C was voted out of office and now serves in a staff capacity at the AFL-CI0. A, or "adversarialist," perhaps surprisingly a longstanding friend of C, is the research director of another industrial union. A was very active in the Students for A Democratic Society in the 1960s, and after graduating from Oberlin College began his career as a labor organizer, working for a succession of unions that had been active in the McGovern-Kucinich wing of the Democratic Party. S, or "stay the course," is the highly respected chief of staff for a national union representing government workers. Section headings and parenthetical references are supplied by the editor and do not appear in the original transcript.
编者按:以下是三名劳工运动主要战略家的非正式谈话的第二部分。(第一部分的标题是“劳动战略”,22 J. Labor Research 569(2001年夏季),并已更新为“劳动战略重访”,可访问www.ssrn.com)。第二次会议也是由C(或“合作者”)召集的,他作为一个地方工会的主席已经十多年了,该工会是一个主要工业工会的一部分,代表了3000名被雇佣到南方城镇一家新制造工厂(“新工厂”)的员工。新工厂被广泛吹捧为美国劳资关系的突破,因为它有意识地促进生产和维修工人在商业决策中的更多参与,以及工会官员与传统管理官员之间的“伙伴关系”角色。在去年竞争激烈的地方选举中,C被赶下台,现在在劳联- ci0担任职员。A,或“对手”,也许令人惊讶的是,他是C的老朋友,是另一个产业工会的研究主管。20世纪60年代,A在学生争取民主社会组织中非常活跃,从奥伯林学院毕业后,他开始了自己的劳工组织者生涯,为一系列活跃于民主党麦戈文-库西尼奇派的工会工作。S的意思是“坚持到底”,他是一个代表政府工作人员的全国工会的备受尊敬的参谋长。章节标题和括号引用是由编辑提供的,不会出现在原始成绩单中。