Modification of systematic sampling: A comparison with a conventional approach in systematic sampling

M. Bujang, Puzziawait Ab Ghani, Nur Amirah Zolkepali, Mariana Mohamad Ali, T. Adnan, S. Selvarajah, J. Haniff
{"title":"Modification of systematic sampling: A comparison with a conventional approach in systematic sampling","authors":"M. Bujang, Puzziawait Ab Ghani, Nur Amirah Zolkepali, Mariana Mohamad Ali, T. Adnan, S. Selvarajah, J. Haniff","doi":"10.1109/ICSSBE.2012.6396525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Systematic sampling is a nonbiased method in recruitment selection process since it is a probability sampling. However, due to slow recruitment, we modified the systematic sampling and evaluate this technique in comparison with the conventional approach of systematic sampling. In this study, we compare results derived from analysis of few sub samples, with the true parameter from the population based on modified systematic sampling and conventional systematic sampling. We found that our modified systematic sampling is slightly better than conventional approach in systematic sampling.","PeriodicalId":106884,"journal":{"name":"2012 International Conference on Statistics in Science, Business and Engineering (ICSSBE)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 International Conference on Statistics in Science, Business and Engineering (ICSSBE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSBE.2012.6396525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Systematic sampling is a nonbiased method in recruitment selection process since it is a probability sampling. However, due to slow recruitment, we modified the systematic sampling and evaluate this technique in comparison with the conventional approach of systematic sampling. In this study, we compare results derived from analysis of few sub samples, with the true parameter from the population based on modified systematic sampling and conventional systematic sampling. We found that our modified systematic sampling is slightly better than conventional approach in systematic sampling.
系统抽样的修正:在系统抽样中与传统方法的比较
系统抽样是一种概率抽样,在招聘过程中是一种无偏抽样方法。然而,由于招募缓慢,我们修改了系统抽样,并与传统的系统抽样方法进行了比较。在本研究中,我们将基于修正系统抽样和常规系统抽样的少数子样本分析结果与来自总体的真实参数进行了比较。我们发现,在系统抽样中,我们改进的系统抽样比传统的方法略好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信