Implementing a Super Decisions Software (SDS) in a Transport Sector

Nabil T. Ismael, A. M. Abdulwahab, Firas Alrawi, Khaldoon Abdulqader Alqessi
{"title":"Implementing a Super Decisions Software (SDS) in a Transport Sector","authors":"Nabil T. Ismael, A. M. Abdulwahab, Firas Alrawi, Khaldoon Abdulqader Alqessi","doi":"10.1109/CSASE48920.2020.9142056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most planning studies used traditional methods for differentiation and evaluation between alternatives and proposals for decision-making and determining the best alternative. One of the disadvantages of these methods is their significant reliance on subjectivity and linear evaluation to compare alternatives and the weak importance of measuring other effects between and within alternatives. It also involves costs, time, and effort to make the most accurate decision. This research attempts to highlight the importance of one of the computer methods used to compare alternatives and identify the best, especially in the transport sector, by applying the Analytic Network Process ANP method using the super decision software SDS. It is characterized by an organized and analytical method to address a wide range of factors rather than relying on intuition to assess the unperceived factors. This is making it a tool to support the decision-making process of complex situations, through the existence of interrelated relationships between elements within a network system. To implement the SDS as an application in the field of transportation, the research suggested three alternatives to construct parking in the Baghdad city center. With a set of primary and secondary criteria, by creating a decision-making structure to extract the relative weights of criteria and priority, thus choosing the best alternative. After the implementation, the software, one of the alternatives, was selected and demonstrated the importance of this application in transport sector studies in particular and planning in general.","PeriodicalId":254581,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (CSASE)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (CSASE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSASE48920.2020.9142056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most planning studies used traditional methods for differentiation and evaluation between alternatives and proposals for decision-making and determining the best alternative. One of the disadvantages of these methods is their significant reliance on subjectivity and linear evaluation to compare alternatives and the weak importance of measuring other effects between and within alternatives. It also involves costs, time, and effort to make the most accurate decision. This research attempts to highlight the importance of one of the computer methods used to compare alternatives and identify the best, especially in the transport sector, by applying the Analytic Network Process ANP method using the super decision software SDS. It is characterized by an organized and analytical method to address a wide range of factors rather than relying on intuition to assess the unperceived factors. This is making it a tool to support the decision-making process of complex situations, through the existence of interrelated relationships between elements within a network system. To implement the SDS as an application in the field of transportation, the research suggested three alternatives to construct parking in the Baghdad city center. With a set of primary and secondary criteria, by creating a decision-making structure to extract the relative weights of criteria and priority, thus choosing the best alternative. After the implementation, the software, one of the alternatives, was selected and demonstrated the importance of this application in transport sector studies in particular and planning in general.
在运输部门实施超级决策软件(SDS)
大多数规划研究使用传统方法来区分和评价备选方案和决策建议,并确定最佳备选方案。这些方法的缺点之一是它们非常依赖主观性和线性评价来比较备选方案,并且测量备选方案之间和备选方案内部的其他影响的重要性较弱。它还涉及成本、时间和努力,以做出最准确的决策。本研究试图通过使用超级决策软件SDS应用分析网络过程ANP方法,强调用于比较备选方案并确定最佳方案的计算机方法之一的重要性,特别是在运输部门。它的特点是有组织的和分析的方法来解决广泛的因素,而不是依靠直觉来评估未察觉的因素。这使它成为一种工具,通过网络系统内各要素之间相互关联的关系的存在,支持复杂情况下的决策过程。为了将SDS应用于交通领域,研究人员提出了在巴格达市中心建设停车场的3种方案。有了一组主要和次要的标准,通过创建决策结构来提取标准和优先级的相对权重,从而选择最佳的备选方案。在实施之后,选择了备选方案之一的软件,并证明了这一应用在运输部门研究和一般规划中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信