{"title":"Di un amico avverso","authors":"G. Oliva","doi":"10.30687/ADA/2421-292X/2018/05/004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"D’Annunzio and De Lollis (both born in 1863 and in the same region) present, in their cultural journey, moments of contact and collaboration, especially in the early years, and contrasts and oppositions, mainly due to different artistic choices and general attitude that led De Lollis to strongly criticise the Poet. From the initial common collaborations with Roman newspapers, we arrive at the moment in which De Lollis moves against d’Annunzio’s art, which was no longer based on solid ethical principles as in the Carduccian lesson but was seen as a superficial and soul-less art, in the triumph of rhetoric. The decisive difference was revealed at the time Italy entered the war, when De Lollis openly criticised d'Annunzio’s position as soon as he returned from France.","PeriodicalId":170358,"journal":{"name":"Archivio d’Annunzio","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivio d’Annunzio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30687/ADA/2421-292X/2018/05/004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
D’Annunzio and De Lollis (both born in 1863 and in the same region) present, in their cultural journey, moments of contact and collaboration, especially in the early years, and contrasts and oppositions, mainly due to different artistic choices and general attitude that led De Lollis to strongly criticise the Poet. From the initial common collaborations with Roman newspapers, we arrive at the moment in which De Lollis moves against d’Annunzio’s art, which was no longer based on solid ethical principles as in the Carduccian lesson but was seen as a superficial and soul-less art, in the triumph of rhetoric. The decisive difference was revealed at the time Italy entered the war, when De Lollis openly criticised d'Annunzio’s position as soon as he returned from France.
D 'Annunzio和De Lollis(都出生于1863年,在同一个地区)在他们的文化之旅中,呈现了接触和合作的时刻,特别是在早期,对比和对立,主要是由于不同的艺术选择和普遍态度,导致De Lollis强烈批评诗人。从最初与罗马报纸的共同合作开始,我们到达了德·洛利斯反对达南齐奥艺术的时刻,达南齐奥的艺术不再像卡杜西亚的课程那样基于坚实的道德原则,而是被视为一种肤浅的,没有灵魂的艺术,在修辞的胜利中。决定性的分歧在意大利参战时显露出来,德洛利斯从法国一回来就公开批评达南齐奥的立场。