Following Lung Resection: Does the volume of perioperative fluid affect patient outcomes?

V. Thai, Megumi Asai, Andres X. Samayoa, C. Hodge, H. Pak, O. Kirton
{"title":"Following Lung Resection: Does the volume of perioperative fluid affect patient outcomes?","authors":"V. Thai, Megumi Asai, Andres X. Samayoa, C. Hodge, H. Pak, O. Kirton","doi":"10.15226/2573-864X/3/3/00141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Appropriate amount of intraoperative intravenous (IV) fluid has been controversial in thoracic surgery. In our study, we investigated outcome measures associated with patients undergoing lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the correlation with perioperative IV fluids. Methods: A retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing open lobectomy and bilobectomy for primary NSCLC between January 2010 and June 2016 was performed. Patient were divided into those receiving intraoperative IV fluid less than 7 cc/ kg/hr, 7 to 10 cc/kg/hr, and equal to or greater than 10 cc/kg/hr. Postoperative IV fluid was also recorded. We compared this against patient’s demographics, intraoperative parameters and complication rate. Results: 142 patients with the mean age of 66.5 years were identified. There was no significant difference in the hospital or ICU stay between any of the groups. Patients who received greater than 10 cc/kg/hr intraoperative IV fluids have higher rate of one or more complications and reoperation rate. Patients who had greater than 1.5 cc/kg/hr perioperative fluid have significantly higher duration of chest tube in-situ and pulmonary complication rate. Patients receiving less than 7 cc/kg/hr intraoperative IV fluids have no benefits compare to the group receiving larger IV fluid. Conclusions: In our study, giving high amounts of intraoperative and perioperative IV fluid has adverse effects on postoperative complications. Giving less (< 7 cc/kg/hr) intraoperative IV fluid has no additional benefits. We propose the optimal amount of intraoperative and perioperative IV fluid given should be in between these two extremes.","PeriodicalId":362247,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15226/2573-864X/3/3/00141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Appropriate amount of intraoperative intravenous (IV) fluid has been controversial in thoracic surgery. In our study, we investigated outcome measures associated with patients undergoing lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the correlation with perioperative IV fluids. Methods: A retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing open lobectomy and bilobectomy for primary NSCLC between January 2010 and June 2016 was performed. Patient were divided into those receiving intraoperative IV fluid less than 7 cc/ kg/hr, 7 to 10 cc/kg/hr, and equal to or greater than 10 cc/kg/hr. Postoperative IV fluid was also recorded. We compared this against patient’s demographics, intraoperative parameters and complication rate. Results: 142 patients with the mean age of 66.5 years were identified. There was no significant difference in the hospital or ICU stay between any of the groups. Patients who received greater than 10 cc/kg/hr intraoperative IV fluids have higher rate of one or more complications and reoperation rate. Patients who had greater than 1.5 cc/kg/hr perioperative fluid have significantly higher duration of chest tube in-situ and pulmonary complication rate. Patients receiving less than 7 cc/kg/hr intraoperative IV fluids have no benefits compare to the group receiving larger IV fluid. Conclusions: In our study, giving high amounts of intraoperative and perioperative IV fluid has adverse effects on postoperative complications. Giving less (< 7 cc/kg/hr) intraoperative IV fluid has no additional benefits. We propose the optimal amount of intraoperative and perioperative IV fluid given should be in between these two extremes.
肺切除术后:围手术期积液量是否影响患者预后?
导读:胸外科术中静脉输液的适当量一直存在争议。在我们的研究中,我们调查了与非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者接受肺切除术相关的结果测量以及围手术期静脉输液的相关性。方法:回顾性分析2010年1月至2016年6月连续行开放性肺叶切除术和胆管切除术的原发性非小细胞肺癌患者。将患者分为术中静脉输液小于7cc /kg/hr、7 ~ 10cc /kg/hr和大于等于10cc /kg/hr三组。术后静脉输液记录。我们将其与患者的人口统计学、术中参数和并发症发生率进行比较。结果:142例患者,平均年龄66.5岁。两组患者在医院或ICU的住院时间均无显著差异。术中静脉输液大于10cc /kg/hr的患者出现一种或多种并发症和再手术率较高。围手术期积液大于1.5 cc/kg/hr的患者胸管原位放置时间和肺部并发症发生率明显增加。术中接受少于7cc /kg/hr静脉输液的患者与接受较大静脉输液的患者相比没有获益。结论:在我们的研究中,术中和围术期给予大量静脉输液对术后并发症有不利影响。术中静脉输液较少(< 7cc /kg/hr)没有额外的好处。我们建议术中和围术期给予的最佳静脉输液量应介于这两个极端之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信