Indexing The Indexer, Part 2. Identifying good practice in journal indexing

A. Kingdom
{"title":"Indexing The Indexer, Part 2. Identifying good practice in journal indexing","authors":"A. Kingdom","doi":"10.3828/indexer.2022.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe previous article in this series outlined the chequered history of indexing The Indexer, emphasising the apparent lack of concern for standardisation and consistency and the failure to establish a thesaurus or controlled vocabulary. Here we focus on the guidance on journal indexing available in the various indexing standards and manuals, and also in the pages of The Indexer itself, and consider the extent to which an agreed set of recommendations can be identified. A brief look at several different journal indexes suggests that users in different disciplines may have different needs, and that one size does not fit all, but who are the users of The Indexer’s indexes and have their views been taken into account?","PeriodicalId":112648,"journal":{"name":"The Indexer: The International Journal of Indexing: Volume 40, Issue 2","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Indexer: The International Journal of Indexing: Volume 40, Issue 2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/indexer.2022.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The previous article in this series outlined the chequered history of indexing The Indexer, emphasising the apparent lack of concern for standardisation and consistency and the failure to establish a thesaurus or controlled vocabulary. Here we focus on the guidance on journal indexing available in the various indexing standards and manuals, and also in the pages of The Indexer itself, and consider the extent to which an agreed set of recommendations can be identified. A brief look at several different journal indexes suggests that users in different disciplines may have different needs, and that one size does not fit all, but who are the users of The Indexer’s indexes and have their views been taken into account?
索引器,第2部分。确定期刊索引的良好做法
本系列的前一篇文章概述了索引The Indexer的曲折历史,强调了明显缺乏对标准化和一致性的关注,以及建立同义词典或受控词汇的失败。在这里,我们将重点关注各种索引标准和手册以及the Indexer本身页面中提供的期刊索引指南,并考虑在多大程度上可以确定一套商定的建议。简单看一下几种不同的期刊索引表明,不同学科的用户可能有不同的需求,一种规格不可能适合所有人,但是谁是the Indexer索引的用户,他们的观点被考虑了吗?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信