THE EMBODIED FLUENCY MODEL: UNCANNINESS BETWEEN THE MERE-EXPOSURE EFFECT AND ANGST

{"title":"THE EMBODIED FLUENCY MODEL: UNCANNINESS BETWEEN THE MERE-EXPOSURE EFFECT AND ANGST","authors":"","doi":"10.26520/ijtps.2022.6.11.39-53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human beings can be said to naturally seek familiarity in their environment for survival purposes, and this can explain why the mere-exposure effect, where being merely exposed to external factors in our environment, can increase preference for these factors. Familiarity in this sense can thus be framed as important for affect and preference formation and considered built upon both the subjective process of fluency and the objects of experience being processed. The feeling of uncanniness is often considered the opposite of familiarity, yet within its semantic vicinity. By considering the term ‘uncanny’ as having a double meaning linked to both familiarity and unfamiliarity, however, this paper will show how this ambiguity allows for a semantic relatedness of this concept to process fluency rather than familiarity. This connection will in turn be shown to have ramifications for affect through the proposal of a fourth model of process fluency: The Embodied Fluency Model. Through consideration of Mori’s shinkawan, Freud’s notion of the uncanny, and Heidegger’s connection between uncanniness and Angst, an exploration into conceiving how fluency and uncanniness share attributes that allow for a different view on affect is propounded","PeriodicalId":150920,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Theology, Philosophy and Science","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Theology, Philosophy and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26520/ijtps.2022.6.11.39-53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human beings can be said to naturally seek familiarity in their environment for survival purposes, and this can explain why the mere-exposure effect, where being merely exposed to external factors in our environment, can increase preference for these factors. Familiarity in this sense can thus be framed as important for affect and preference formation and considered built upon both the subjective process of fluency and the objects of experience being processed. The feeling of uncanniness is often considered the opposite of familiarity, yet within its semantic vicinity. By considering the term ‘uncanny’ as having a double meaning linked to both familiarity and unfamiliarity, however, this paper will show how this ambiguity allows for a semantic relatedness of this concept to process fluency rather than familiarity. This connection will in turn be shown to have ramifications for affect through the proposal of a fourth model of process fluency: The Embodied Fluency Model. Through consideration of Mori’s shinkawan, Freud’s notion of the uncanny, and Heidegger’s connection between uncanniness and Angst, an exploration into conceiving how fluency and uncanniness share attributes that allow for a different view on affect is propounded
具身流畅性模型:单纯暴露效应与焦虑之间的不确定性
可以说,出于生存的目的,人类自然会在环境中寻求熟悉,这可以解释为什么仅仅暴露于环境中的外部因素会增加对这些因素的偏好。因此,在这个意义上,熟悉度对于情感和偏好的形成是重要的,并且被认为是建立在流利的主观过程和被处理的经验对象的基础上的。不可思议的感觉通常被认为是熟悉的对立面,但在语义上却很接近。然而,通过考虑术语“不可思议”具有与熟悉和不熟悉相关的双重含义,本文将展示这种模糊性如何允许该概念的语义相关性处理流畅性而不是熟悉性。通过提出过程流畅性的第四个模型:具身流畅性模型,这种联系反过来又会对影响产生影响。通过对森的新川、弗洛伊德的神秘概念以及海德格尔的神秘与焦虑之间的联系的考虑,探讨了流畅性和神秘是如何共享属性的,从而提出了对情感的不同看法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信