Ways of thinking siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah pola bilangan non rutin: Suatu penelitian fenomenologi hermeneutik

Aiyub Aiyub
{"title":"Ways of thinking siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah pola bilangan non rutin: Suatu penelitian fenomenologi hermeneutik","authors":"Aiyub Aiyub","doi":"10.34007/jdm.v4i2.1851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted with the aim of investigating and exploring students' ways of thinking (WoT) in solving non-routine number pattern problems. This study used a qualitative method with a hermeneutic phenomenological approach with grade 8 students at a junior high school in Banda Aceh. To achieve the research objectives, data collection was carried out using a written test instrument with a number pattern on a 4-digit palindrome, structured documentation, and clinical interviews. The results of the study show that students' WoT in solving non-routine number pattern problems is that there are four approaches used in solving non-routine problems, namely: first, determining the special case; second, determining the pattern; third, using a mathematical model; and fourth, using a similar problem. The subject of critical reflection uses the three WoTs above except for using similar problems. The subject of explicit reflection uses the three approaches above except for using a mathematical model. While Subjects who cannot solve the problem only use the strategy of identifying special cases. Another finding is that the subject of critical reflection tends to use different strategies from those given by the teacher, is unique, and gives reasons for algebraic forms. In contrast, explicit reflection subjects tend to be less flexible in using strategies and tend to use inductive or arithmetic reasons. To support students in their ability to pattern and think algebraically, teachers must accustom students to solving non-routine mathematical problems in various contexts of learning by using number patterns.","PeriodicalId":348494,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Didactic Mathematics","volume":"2014 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Didactic Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34007/jdm.v4i2.1851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was conducted with the aim of investigating and exploring students' ways of thinking (WoT) in solving non-routine number pattern problems. This study used a qualitative method with a hermeneutic phenomenological approach with grade 8 students at a junior high school in Banda Aceh. To achieve the research objectives, data collection was carried out using a written test instrument with a number pattern on a 4-digit palindrome, structured documentation, and clinical interviews. The results of the study show that students' WoT in solving non-routine number pattern problems is that there are four approaches used in solving non-routine problems, namely: first, determining the special case; second, determining the pattern; third, using a mathematical model; and fourth, using a similar problem. The subject of critical reflection uses the three WoTs above except for using similar problems. The subject of explicit reflection uses the three approaches above except for using a mathematical model. While Subjects who cannot solve the problem only use the strategy of identifying special cases. Another finding is that the subject of critical reflection tends to use different strategies from those given by the teacher, is unique, and gives reasons for algebraic forms. In contrast, explicit reflection subjects tend to be less flexible in using strategies and tend to use inductive or arithmetic reasons. To support students in their ability to pattern and think algebraically, teachers must accustom students to solving non-routine mathematical problems in various contexts of learning by using number patterns.
思考学生解决非常规数字模式问题的方法:解释学表现学研究
本研究旨在调查和探讨学生在解决非常规数字模式问题时的思维方式。本研究以班达亚齐一所初中八年级学生为研究对象,采用解释学现象学方法进行定性研究。为了实现研究目标,数据收集采用4位回文数字模式的书面测试工具、结构化文档和临床访谈进行。研究结果表明,学生在解决非常规数字模式问题时的WoT表现为解决非常规问题时采用了四种方法,即:一是确定特殊情况;二是确定格局;第三,运用数学模型;第四,用一个类似的问题。批判性反思的主题除了使用类似的问题外,还使用了上述三个wot。外显反射的主题除了使用数学模型外,使用上述三种方法。而无法解决问题的被试只使用识别特殊情况的策略。另一个发现是,批判性反思的主题倾向于使用不同于老师给出的策略,是独特的,并给出了代数形式的原因。相比之下,外显反思被试在使用策略时往往不那么灵活,倾向于使用归纳或算术推理。为了支持学生的模式和代数思维能力,教师必须让学生习惯于在各种学习环境中使用数字模式来解决非常规的数学问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信