Grave Matters: The Ancient Rights of the Graveyard

BYU Law Review Pub Date : 2005-08-01 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.777747
A. Brophy
{"title":"Grave Matters: The Ancient Rights of the Graveyard","authors":"A. Brophy","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.777747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Descendants of people buried in cemeteries on private property have a common law right to access that property to visit the cemetery. That right, which is akin to an implied easement in gross, is recognized by statute in about a quarter of states and by case law in many others. Grave Matters explores the origins, nature, and scope of the little-recognized right and its implications for property theory. It discusses the right as part of well-established property doctrine and its relationship to recent takings cases, as well as the corollary graveyard right against desecration and the correlative right of communities to relocate cemeteries. The right of access, which traces its roots to the early the nineteenth-century, is important because it is one of the few implied rights of access to private property. It limits, by implication, the right to exclude, which is at the core of property rights. Thus, it offers a way of getting access to property without facing a takings claim. Moreover, the right is important because it reminds us that there are limits of the right of exclusion, which were recognized at common law. The right of relocation further illustrates the careful balancing of property rights with the community's right. Thus, the graveyard rights together emerge as vestiges of the nineteenth-century's consideration of community and property. A final section suggests the importance of the right of access for recent discussion about reparations for the era of slavery, for the right of access provides a property right (an easement) in descendants of slaves buried on plantations to access those plantations. The property held by descendants provides important symbolic connections between the past and present and offers hope of a lawsuit for reparations that is not barred by the statute of limitations.","PeriodicalId":142428,"journal":{"name":"BYU Law Review","volume":"2014 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BYU Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.777747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Descendants of people buried in cemeteries on private property have a common law right to access that property to visit the cemetery. That right, which is akin to an implied easement in gross, is recognized by statute in about a quarter of states and by case law in many others. Grave Matters explores the origins, nature, and scope of the little-recognized right and its implications for property theory. It discusses the right as part of well-established property doctrine and its relationship to recent takings cases, as well as the corollary graveyard right against desecration and the correlative right of communities to relocate cemeteries. The right of access, which traces its roots to the early the nineteenth-century, is important because it is one of the few implied rights of access to private property. It limits, by implication, the right to exclude, which is at the core of property rights. Thus, it offers a way of getting access to property without facing a takings claim. Moreover, the right is important because it reminds us that there are limits of the right of exclusion, which were recognized at common law. The right of relocation further illustrates the careful balancing of property rights with the community's right. Thus, the graveyard rights together emerge as vestiges of the nineteenth-century's consideration of community and property. A final section suggests the importance of the right of access for recent discussion about reparations for the era of slavery, for the right of access provides a property right (an easement) in descendants of slaves buried on plantations to access those plantations. The property held by descendants provides important symbolic connections between the past and present and offers hope of a lawsuit for reparations that is not barred by the statute of limitations.
坟墓的问题:墓地的古代权利
埋葬在私人墓地的人的后代根据普通法有权进入该财产参观墓地。这项权利在总体上类似于默示地役权,在大约四分之一的州得到了成文法的承认,在许多其他州得到了判例法的承认。这本书探讨了这项鲜为人知的权利的起源、性质和范围,以及它对财产理论的影响。它讨论了作为完善的财产原则的一部分的权利及其与最近征收案件的关系,以及反对亵渎墓地的必然权利和社区重新安置墓地的相关权利。进入权的根源可以追溯到19世纪早期,它很重要,因为它是少数几个进入私有财产的隐含权利之一。它含蓄地限制了排他权,而排他权是产权的核心。因此,它提供了一种在不面临征用索赔的情况下获得财产的方式。此外,这项权利之所以重要,是因为它提醒我们,排他权是有限制的,这在普通法上得到了承认。拆迁权进一步说明了产权与社区权利的谨慎平衡。因此,墓地权作为19世纪对社区和财产考虑的遗迹一起出现。最后一节提出了进入权对最近关于奴隶制时代赔偿的讨论的重要性,因为进入权为埋葬在种植园的奴隶的后代提供了进入这些种植园的财产权(地役权)。后代所拥有的财产提供了过去和现在之间重要的象征性联系,并提供了不受诉讼时效限制的赔偿诉讼的希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信