The Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy vs . the 3D-Conformal Radiotherapy Regarding Acute Radiation Skin Toxicity and TreatmentRelated Lymphopenia in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients

Osama H Elzaafarany, E. Ali, S. Fadel, A. Kandil
{"title":"The Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy vs . the 3D-Conformal Radiotherapy Regarding Acute Radiation Skin Toxicity and TreatmentRelated Lymphopenia in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients","authors":"Osama H Elzaafarany, E. Ali, S. Fadel, A. Kandil","doi":"10.4172/2155-9619.1000401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Adjuvant radiotherapy is an integral part of breast cancer treatment, and there was a great evolution of radiotherapy techniques over the past few years. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) was developed in the 1990s as a modern technique aiming to spare normal tissues from toxic effects of radiotherapy. This study aimed at comparing the IMRT technique to the 3D-coformal radiotherapy technique (3D-CRT) in early breast cancer patients regarding the occurrence of acute skin toxicities and treatment-related lymphopenia (TRL). It is a prospective study conducted on 100 eligible patients who were divided equally between two groups; the first, are patients received adjuvant radiotherapy using IMRT technique and the second group were those who received 3D-CRT. Results showed that sever acute skin toxicity or moist desquamation in IMRT group was 6% vs. 18% in 3DCRT group (p<0.05). And, the sever TRL with IMRT technique was 9% compared 21% among those of the 3D-CRT group (p<0.05). The IMRT technique resulted in statistically significant lower incidence of sever acute skin toxicities as well as less sever TRL when compared with 3D-CRT technique.","PeriodicalId":302578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Therapy","volume":"125 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9619.1000401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adjuvant radiotherapy is an integral part of breast cancer treatment, and there was a great evolution of radiotherapy techniques over the past few years. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) was developed in the 1990s as a modern technique aiming to spare normal tissues from toxic effects of radiotherapy. This study aimed at comparing the IMRT technique to the 3D-coformal radiotherapy technique (3D-CRT) in early breast cancer patients regarding the occurrence of acute skin toxicities and treatment-related lymphopenia (TRL). It is a prospective study conducted on 100 eligible patients who were divided equally between two groups; the first, are patients received adjuvant radiotherapy using IMRT technique and the second group were those who received 3D-CRT. Results showed that sever acute skin toxicity or moist desquamation in IMRT group was 6% vs. 18% in 3DCRT group (p<0.05). And, the sever TRL with IMRT technique was 9% compared 21% among those of the 3D-CRT group (p<0.05). The IMRT technique resulted in statistically significant lower incidence of sever acute skin toxicities as well as less sever TRL when compared with 3D-CRT technique.
调强放疗vs。早期乳腺癌患者急性放射皮肤毒性及治疗相关淋巴细胞减少的3d适形放疗
辅助放疗是乳腺癌治疗中不可缺少的一部分,在过去的几年里,放疗技术有了很大的发展。调强放射治疗(IMRT)是20世纪90年代发展起来的一种现代技术,旨在使正常组织免受放射治疗的毒性影响。本研究旨在比较IMRT技术与3D-CRT技术在早期乳腺癌患者急性皮肤毒性和治疗相关性淋巴细胞减少症(TRL)发生方面的差异。这是一项对100名符合条件的患者进行的前瞻性研究,这些患者平均分为两组;第一组为接受IMRT辅助放疗的患者,第二组为接受3D-CRT的患者。结果IMRT组严重急性皮肤毒性或湿性脱屑率为6%,3DCRT组为18% (p<0.05)。IMRT组严重TRL发生率为9%,3D-CRT组为21% (p<0.05)。与3D-CRT技术相比,IMRT技术导致严重急性皮肤毒性发生率降低,严重TRL发生率降低,具有统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信