I. Fasterholdt, K. Kidholm, T. Laursen, L. Rodkjær
{"title":"Cost analysis of a mind–body intervention compared to usual hospital-based outpatient visits in HIV-infected individuals: a feasibility study","authors":"I. Fasterholdt, K. Kidholm, T. Laursen, L. Rodkjær","doi":"10.21965/IJHBHTA.2020.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"©2020 Fasterholdt et al., publisher and licensee CybelePress.com. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract: This study compared the costs of a mind–body intervention with usual care for individuals infected with HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus). Further, consequences on labour market attachment were explored. The cost analysis was nested in a randomized controlled trial conducted in 2015 at the Department of Infectious Diseases at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. A total of 30 patients were randomized to one of two arms. The intervention consisted of a group intervention facilitated by an educated coach. Usual care consisted of standard outpatient visits alone. Total healthcare and patient costs were estimated over a twelve-month period at individual level from a societal perspective. Costs of resource used in primary and secondary health sectors were included as well as patient costs. To explore uncertainty one-way sensitivity analysis was performed. Total costs were found to be on average €14,549 less per patient compared to usual care. However, this difference was not statistically significant. Number of working hours and proportion of persons employed per year in the two groups were similar. The sensitivity analysis showed that the absolute difference in costs observed was due to one control patient with an extremely high use of hospital resources. The absolute difference in costs was similar to the base case when using two-year follow-up. This small feasibility study indicate that it is possible to deliver an extra service for HIV-infected individuals in the form of a mind–body intervention at roughly similar costs compared with standard outpatient visits alone.","PeriodicalId":406099,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Hospital Based Health Technology Assessment","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Hospital Based Health Technology Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21965/IJHBHTA.2020.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
对hiv感染者进行身心干预与常规医院门诊的成本分析:可行性研究
©2020 Fasterholdt et al.,出版商和被许可方CybelePress.com。这是一篇开放获取文章,允许不受限制的非商业用途,前提是原始作品被正确引用。摘要:本研究比较了对HIV(人类免疫缺陷病毒)感染者进行身心干预与常规护理的成本。此外,还探讨了对劳动力市场依附的影响。成本分析嵌套在2015年在丹麦奥胡斯大学医院传染病科进行的一项随机对照试验中。共有30名患者被随机分为两组。干预包括由受过教育的教练指导的小组干预。常规护理仅包括标准的门诊就诊。从社会角度估计了个人在12个月期间的医疗保健和患者总费用。初级和二级卫生部门使用的资源费用以及患者费用也包括在内。为探讨不确定度,采用单因素敏感性分析。研究发现,与常规护理相比,每位患者的总成本平均减少了14,549欧元。然而,这种差异在统计学上并不显著。两组每年的工作时数和就业人数比例相似。敏感性分析表明,观察到的成本绝对差异是由于一名对照患者对医院资源的使用非常高。当使用两年随访时,成本的绝对差异与基本情况相似。这项小型可行性研究表明,与单独的标准门诊就诊相比,有可能以身心干预的形式为艾滋病毒感染者提供额外的服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。