Remote elementary education (Part 2): grade-level comparative analysis with control

Stefan Kleinke, David Cross
{"title":"Remote elementary education (Part 2): grade-level comparative analysis with control","authors":"Stefan Kleinke, David Cross","doi":"10.1108/jrit-03-2022-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this two-part research was to investigate the effect of remote learning on student progress in elementary education. Part 2, presented in this paper, is a follow-up study to examine how student progression in the two pandemic-induced environments compared to the pre-pandemic conditions.Design/methodology/approach The authors expanded the quantitative, quasi-experimental factorial design of the authors' initial study with additional ex-post-facto standardized test score data from before the pandemic to enhance the group comparison with a control: the conventional pre-pandemic classroom environment. Thus, the authors were able to examine in which ways the two pandemic-induced learning environments (remote and hybrid) may have affected learner progress in the two subject areas: English Language (ELA) and Math. Additionally, the authors provided a grade-by-grade breakdown of analysis results.FindingsFindings revealed significant group differences in grade levels at or below 6th grade. In the majority of analyzed comparisons, learner achievement in the hybrid group was significantly lower than those in either the remote or the classroom group, or both.Research limitations/implications The additional findings further supported the authors' initial hypotheses: Differences in the consistency and continuity of educational approaches, as well as potential differences in learner predispositions and the availability of home support systems may have influenced observed results. Thus, this research also contributes to the general knowledge about learner needs in elementary education.Originality/valueDuring the pandemic, remote learning became ubiquitous. However, in contrast to e-learning in postsecondary education, for which an abundance of research has been conducted, relatively little is known about the efficacy of such approaches in elementary education.","PeriodicalId":244951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jrit-03-2022-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this two-part research was to investigate the effect of remote learning on student progress in elementary education. Part 2, presented in this paper, is a follow-up study to examine how student progression in the two pandemic-induced environments compared to the pre-pandemic conditions.Design/methodology/approach The authors expanded the quantitative, quasi-experimental factorial design of the authors' initial study with additional ex-post-facto standardized test score data from before the pandemic to enhance the group comparison with a control: the conventional pre-pandemic classroom environment. Thus, the authors were able to examine in which ways the two pandemic-induced learning environments (remote and hybrid) may have affected learner progress in the two subject areas: English Language (ELA) and Math. Additionally, the authors provided a grade-by-grade breakdown of analysis results.FindingsFindings revealed significant group differences in grade levels at or below 6th grade. In the majority of analyzed comparisons, learner achievement in the hybrid group was significantly lower than those in either the remote or the classroom group, or both.Research limitations/implications The additional findings further supported the authors' initial hypotheses: Differences in the consistency and continuity of educational approaches, as well as potential differences in learner predispositions and the availability of home support systems may have influenced observed results. Thus, this research also contributes to the general knowledge about learner needs in elementary education.Originality/valueDuring the pandemic, remote learning became ubiquitous. However, in contrast to e-learning in postsecondary education, for which an abundance of research has been conducted, relatively little is known about the efficacy of such approaches in elementary education.
远程基础教育(下):有控制的年级水平比较分析
目的本研究分为两部分,旨在探讨远程学习对基础教育学生进步的影响。本文提出的第2部分是一项后续研究,旨在研究与大流行前的情况相比,学生在两种大流行诱发环境中的进展情况。设计/方法/方法作者利用大流行前的额外事后标准化考试成绩数据扩展了作者最初研究的定量、准实验析因设计,以加强与对照组的组比较:传统的大流行前教室环境。因此,作者能够检查两种由大流行引起的学习环境(远程和混合)可能以何种方式影响学习者在英语语言(ELA)和数学这两个学科领域的进步。此外,作者还提供了分析结果的逐级细分。研究结果发现在六年级或六年级以下的年级水平上存在显著的组间差异。在大多数分析比较中,混合组的学习者成绩明显低于远程组或课堂组,或两者都低于。研究的局限性/意义额外的发现进一步支持了作者最初的假设:教育方法的一致性和连续性的差异,以及学习者倾向和家庭支持系统的可用性的潜在差异可能影响了观察到的结果。因此,本研究也有助于对基础教育中学习者需求的一般认识。在疫情期间,远程学习变得无处不在。然而,与已经进行了大量研究的高等教育中的电子学习相比,人们对这些方法在小学教育中的有效性知之甚少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信