Decentralized prognosis of failures in discrete event systems

R. Kumar, S. Takai
{"title":"Decentralized prognosis of failures in discrete event systems","authors":"R. Kumar, S. Takai","doi":"10.1109/WODES.2008.4605975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the prognosis of failures, i.e., their prediction prior to their occurrence, in discrete event systems in a decentralized setting where multiple prognosers use their local observations to issue local prognosis decisions. We define the notion of correctness of a decentralized set of prognosers in terms of ldquono missed detectionsrdquo (each failure is prognosed prior to its occurrence) and ldquono false alarmsrdquo (an incorrect prognostic decision is never issued), and introduce the notion of coprognosability as an existence condition. When specialized to the centralized case (i.e., the case of a single prognoser), this condition turns out to be weaker than the one introduced in (S. Gene and Sl Lafortune, 2006) since a uniform bound on the number of steps within which a failure will occur is not required. For comparison we also introduce the stronger notion of ldquouniformly bounded coprognosabilityrdquo and identify the subclass of decentralized prognosers for which it serves as an existence condition. We show that the two notions coincide when the underlying system and its nonfailure specification possess finite-state representations, and present a verification algorithm. We also introduce the notion of reaction bound for coprognosis as the earliest time beyond a prognostic decision when a failure can occur, and present an algorithm for computing it. An algorithm is also presented for an online prognosis of failures. We show that the notions of coprognosability and its uniformly bounded version are in general incomparable with the notion of codiagnosability (that guarantees a uniformly bounded delay detection of a failure by a local diagnoser). When the system cannot execute an unbounded sequence of unobservable events, uniformly bounded coprognosability implies codiagnosability, whereas coprognosability and codiagnosability remain incomparable.","PeriodicalId":105225,"journal":{"name":"2008 9th International Workshop on Discrete Event Systems","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 9th International Workshop on Discrete Event Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WODES.2008.4605975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

We study the prognosis of failures, i.e., their prediction prior to their occurrence, in discrete event systems in a decentralized setting where multiple prognosers use their local observations to issue local prognosis decisions. We define the notion of correctness of a decentralized set of prognosers in terms of ldquono missed detectionsrdquo (each failure is prognosed prior to its occurrence) and ldquono false alarmsrdquo (an incorrect prognostic decision is never issued), and introduce the notion of coprognosability as an existence condition. When specialized to the centralized case (i.e., the case of a single prognoser), this condition turns out to be weaker than the one introduced in (S. Gene and Sl Lafortune, 2006) since a uniform bound on the number of steps within which a failure will occur is not required. For comparison we also introduce the stronger notion of ldquouniformly bounded coprognosabilityrdquo and identify the subclass of decentralized prognosers for which it serves as an existence condition. We show that the two notions coincide when the underlying system and its nonfailure specification possess finite-state representations, and present a verification algorithm. We also introduce the notion of reaction bound for coprognosis as the earliest time beyond a prognostic decision when a failure can occur, and present an algorithm for computing it. An algorithm is also presented for an online prognosis of failures. We show that the notions of coprognosability and its uniformly bounded version are in general incomparable with the notion of codiagnosability (that guarantees a uniformly bounded delay detection of a failure by a local diagnoser). When the system cannot execute an unbounded sequence of unobservable events, uniformly bounded coprognosability implies codiagnosability, whereas coprognosability and codiagnosability remain incomparable.
离散事件系统故障的分散预测
我们研究故障的预测,即,在分散设置的离散事件系统中,多个预测者使用他们的局部观察来发布局部预测决策。我们定义了一组分散的预测器的正确性概念,即未检测到的故障(每次故障在发生之前就被预测到)和错误警报(永远不会发出错误的预测决策),并引入了共同预测性的概念作为存在条件。当专门针对集中情况(即单个预测者的情况)时,这种情况比(S. Gene和Sl . Lafortune, 2006)中引入的情况弱,因为不需要对发生故障的步骤数进行统一的限制。为了进行比较,我们还引入了更强的同质有界协同预测的概念,并确定了将其作为存在条件的分散预测的子类。我们证明了当底层系统及其非故障规范具有有限状态表示时,这两个概念是一致的,并提出了一个验证算法。我们还引入了共同预测反应界的概念,即故障可能发生的最早时间超出预测决策的时间,并给出了计算它的算法。提出了一种故障在线预测算法。我们证明了共同可预测性的概念及其一致有界版本通常与共同可诊断性的概念(保证局部诊断器对故障的一致有界延迟检测)是不可比较的。当系统不能执行无界的不可观察事件序列时,均匀有界的共预测性意味着可共诊断性,而共预测性和可共诊断性仍然是不可比较的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信