Clinical encounter heterogeneity and methods for resolving in networked EHR data: A study from N3C and RECOVER programs

P. Leese, A. Anand, A. Girvin, A. Manna, S. Patel, Y. J. Yoo, R. Wong, M. Haendel, C. Chute, T. Bennett, J. Hajagos, E. Pfaff, R. Moffitt
{"title":"Clinical encounter heterogeneity and methods for resolving in networked EHR data: A study from N3C and RECOVER programs","authors":"P. Leese, A. Anand, A. Girvin, A. Manna, S. Patel, Y. J. Yoo, R. Wong, M. Haendel, C. Chute, T. Bennett, J. Hajagos, E. Pfaff, R. Moffitt","doi":"10.1101/2022.10.14.22281106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: Clinical encounter data are heterogeneous and vary greatly from institution to institution. These problems of variance affect interpretability and usability of clinical encounter data for analysis. These problems are magnified when multi-site electronic health record data are networked together. This paper presents a novel, generalizable method for resolving encounter heterogeneity for analysis by combining related atomic encounters into composite macrovisits. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Encounters were composed of data from 75 partner sites harmonized to a common data model as part of the NIH Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery Initiative, a project of the National Covid Cohort Collaborative. Summary statistics were computed for overall and site-level data to assess issues and identify modifications. Two algorithms were developed to refine atomic encounters into cleaner, analyzable longitudinal clinical visits. RESULTS: Atomic inpatient encounters data were found to be widely disparate between sites in terms of length-of-stay and numbers of OMOP CDM measurements per encounter. After aggregating encounters to macrovisits, variance of length-of-stay (LOS) and measurement frequency decreased. A subsequent algorithm to identify hospitalized macrovisits further reduced data variability. DISCUSSION: Encounters data are a complex and heterogeneous component of EHR data and these issues are not addressed by existing methods. These types of complex and poorly studied issues contribute to the difficulty of deriving value from EHR data, and these types of foundational, large-scale explorations and developments are necessary to realize the full potential of modern real world data. CONCLUSION: This paper presents method developments to work with and resolve EHR encounters data in a generalizable way as a foundation for future analyses and research.","PeriodicalId":236137,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.14.22281106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Clinical encounter data are heterogeneous and vary greatly from institution to institution. These problems of variance affect interpretability and usability of clinical encounter data for analysis. These problems are magnified when multi-site electronic health record data are networked together. This paper presents a novel, generalizable method for resolving encounter heterogeneity for analysis by combining related atomic encounters into composite macrovisits. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Encounters were composed of data from 75 partner sites harmonized to a common data model as part of the NIH Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery Initiative, a project of the National Covid Cohort Collaborative. Summary statistics were computed for overall and site-level data to assess issues and identify modifications. Two algorithms were developed to refine atomic encounters into cleaner, analyzable longitudinal clinical visits. RESULTS: Atomic inpatient encounters data were found to be widely disparate between sites in terms of length-of-stay and numbers of OMOP CDM measurements per encounter. After aggregating encounters to macrovisits, variance of length-of-stay (LOS) and measurement frequency decreased. A subsequent algorithm to identify hospitalized macrovisits further reduced data variability. DISCUSSION: Encounters data are a complex and heterogeneous component of EHR data and these issues are not addressed by existing methods. These types of complex and poorly studied issues contribute to the difficulty of deriving value from EHR data, and these types of foundational, large-scale explorations and developments are necessary to realize the full potential of modern real world data. CONCLUSION: This paper presents method developments to work with and resolve EHR encounters data in a generalizable way as a foundation for future analyses and research.
网络EHR数据中临床遭遇异质性和解决方法:来自N3C和RECOVER项目的研究
目的:临床遭遇数据是异质的,各机构差异很大。这些差异问题影响了临床就诊数据的可解释性和可用性。当多个站点的电子健康记录数据联网在一起时,这些问题被放大了。本文提出了一种新的、可推广的方法,通过将相关的原子相遇组合成复合宏访问来解决分析中的相遇异质性。材料和方法:遭遇由来自75个合作伙伴站点的数据组成,这些数据统一到一个公共数据模型中,作为NIH研究COVID以增强恢复计划的一部分,该计划是国家COVID队列协作项目的一个项目。计算总体和站点级别数据的汇总统计数据,以评估问题并确定修改。开发了两种算法,将原子接触细化为更清洁,可分析的纵向临床访问。结果:原子住院患者接触数据被发现在每次接触的停留时间和OMOP CDM测量次数方面在不同地点之间存在很大差异。将接触汇总到宏观访问后,停留时间(LOS)和测量频率的方差减小。随后确定住院宏观就诊的算法进一步降低了数据的可变性。讨论:会诊数据是电子病历数据中一个复杂且异构的组成部分,现有方法无法解决这些问题。这些类型的复杂和研究不足的问题导致难以从电子病历数据中获得价值,而这些类型的基础,大规模的探索和开发对于实现现代现实世界数据的全部潜力是必要的。结论:本文提出了以一种可推广的方式处理和解决电子病历遭遇数据的方法发展,作为未来分析和研究的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信