Military requirements constrain COTS utilization

E. Trujillo
{"title":"Military requirements constrain COTS utilization","authors":"E. Trujillo","doi":"10.1109/DASC.1995.482815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the past, our military systems have required technology not readily available in the industrial and commercial areas. This is no longer the case. Commercial products and practices offer the potential of reduced costs, lower risk and faster technology infusion. In order to achieve the potential benefits, our current methods of acquisition need change but it is important to review the background behind the institution of military standards and to assess their continued validity and to understand why. Also, before we rush to the conclusion that military specifications and standards are preferred for avionics over commercial products and practices, it is useful to review the specific requirements. In the past, in the absence of military specifications and standards, situations arose where items were developed using existing industrial and commercial products, processes and practices that at times led to catastrophic results or were inadequate to meet the threat. It is comforting that those who demand change show wisdom by asking that change be conducted with care and the impact understood. However, some use hyperbole in condemning the reliance on military specifications and standards and insist that their elimination is a good thing. In the domain of high performance aircraft avionics the potential for change is likely to be limited without an in-depth comprehension of the military environment, requirements and the capability of commercial products to satisfy them.","PeriodicalId":125963,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 14th Digital Avionics Systems Conference","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 14th Digital Avionics Systems Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC.1995.482815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In the past, our military systems have required technology not readily available in the industrial and commercial areas. This is no longer the case. Commercial products and practices offer the potential of reduced costs, lower risk and faster technology infusion. In order to achieve the potential benefits, our current methods of acquisition need change but it is important to review the background behind the institution of military standards and to assess their continued validity and to understand why. Also, before we rush to the conclusion that military specifications and standards are preferred for avionics over commercial products and practices, it is useful to review the specific requirements. In the past, in the absence of military specifications and standards, situations arose where items were developed using existing industrial and commercial products, processes and practices that at times led to catastrophic results or were inadequate to meet the threat. It is comforting that those who demand change show wisdom by asking that change be conducted with care and the impact understood. However, some use hyperbole in condemning the reliance on military specifications and standards and insist that their elimination is a good thing. In the domain of high performance aircraft avionics the potential for change is likely to be limited without an in-depth comprehension of the military environment, requirements and the capability of commercial products to satisfy them.
军事需求限制了COTS的使用
在过去,我们的军事系统所需要的技术在工业和商业领域并不容易获得。现在情况已经不同了。商业产品和实践提供了降低成本、降低风险和加快技术注入的潜力。为了实现潜在的利益,我们目前的采买方法需要改变,但重要的是要回顾军事标准制度背后的背景,评估其持续有效性并了解原因。同样,在我们匆忙得出军用规格和标准比商业产品和实践更适合航空电子设备的结论之前,回顾一下具体要求是有用的。过去,在没有军事规格和标准的情况下,会出现使用现有工业和商业产品、过程和做法开发项目的情况,这些产品、过程和做法有时会导致灾难性的结果,或者不足以应对威胁。令人欣慰的是,那些要求变革的人通过要求谨慎地进行变革并理解其影响来显示智慧。然而,一些人夸张地谴责对军事规格和标准的依赖,并坚持认为取消这些规格和标准是一件好事。在高性能飞机航空电子设备领域,如果不深入了解军事环境、要求和商业产品满足这些要求的能力,变革的潜力可能会受到限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信