Cost Allocation of Voltage Unbalance in Distribution Networks

J. Kennedy, Martina Morcos, Assane Lo
{"title":"Cost Allocation of Voltage Unbalance in Distribution Networks","authors":"J. Kennedy, Martina Morcos, Assane Lo","doi":"10.1109/ICHQP46026.2020.9177935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The proliferation of distributed generation has increased the complexity of voltage regulation in distribution networks. Asymmetrical line impedance, the presence of single phase generation and unbalanced loading can produce voltage unbalance. The performance of high efficiency three-phase induction machines drops significantly with voltage unbalance. Currently, there is no mechanism to ensure that a customer in ownership of a voltage unbalance sensitive load is compensated for excessive voltage unbalance. In response, the authors propose a market framework where compensation is to be paid between offending and affected customers where voltage unbalance limits are exceeded. The ideal compensation payments are calculated using Shapley values, but this technique is found to be prohibitively computationally expensive for large numbers of loads. An approximate method using voltage unbalance sensitivities is proposed as a remedy. The approximate method is compared with the Shapley value method using a nine load bus case study with a voltage unbalance violation compensation cost of $10. The results show a $2.11 root mean squared error for individual voltage unbalance compensation calculations over 1000 randomly generated cases with an unacceptable voltage unbalance. The diversif cation of compensation payments over many violations substantially reduced the error.","PeriodicalId":436720,"journal":{"name":"2020 19th International Conference on Harmonics and Quality of Power (ICHQP)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 19th International Conference on Harmonics and Quality of Power (ICHQP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHQP46026.2020.9177935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The proliferation of distributed generation has increased the complexity of voltage regulation in distribution networks. Asymmetrical line impedance, the presence of single phase generation and unbalanced loading can produce voltage unbalance. The performance of high efficiency three-phase induction machines drops significantly with voltage unbalance. Currently, there is no mechanism to ensure that a customer in ownership of a voltage unbalance sensitive load is compensated for excessive voltage unbalance. In response, the authors propose a market framework where compensation is to be paid between offending and affected customers where voltage unbalance limits are exceeded. The ideal compensation payments are calculated using Shapley values, but this technique is found to be prohibitively computationally expensive for large numbers of loads. An approximate method using voltage unbalance sensitivities is proposed as a remedy. The approximate method is compared with the Shapley value method using a nine load bus case study with a voltage unbalance violation compensation cost of $10. The results show a $2.11 root mean squared error for individual voltage unbalance compensation calculations over 1000 randomly generated cases with an unacceptable voltage unbalance. The diversif cation of compensation payments over many violations substantially reduced the error.
配电网电压不平衡的成本分配
分布式发电的普及增加了配电网电压调节的复杂性。线路阻抗不对称、单相产生和负载不平衡都会产生电压不平衡。电压不平衡会使高效三相感应电机的性能显著下降。目前,还没有机制来确保拥有电压不平衡敏感负载的客户对过度电压不平衡进行补偿。作为回应,作者提出了一个市场框架,在超过电压不平衡限制的情况下,在违规客户和受影响客户之间支付补偿。理想的补偿支付是使用Shapley值来计算的,但是这种技术对于大量负载来说计算成本过高。提出了一种利用电压不平衡灵敏度的近似方法作为补救措施。以电压不平衡违例补偿成本为10美元的9负载母线为例,将近似方法与Shapley值法进行了比较。结果显示,在1000个随机生成的电压不平衡不可接受的情况下,单个电压不平衡补偿计算的均方根误差为2.11美元。对许多违规行为的赔偿支付的多样化大大减少了误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信