Real-driving-based comparison of the eco-impact of powertrain concepts using a data-driven optimization environment

A. Esser, Tobias Eichenlaub, S. Rinderknecht
{"title":"Real-driving-based comparison of the eco-impact of powertrain concepts using a data-driven optimization environment","authors":"A. Esser, Tobias Eichenlaub, S. Rinderknecht","doi":"10.25534/TUPRINTS-00011933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to limit the effects of man-made climate change, the assessment of the ecological impact of different powertrain concepts is of increasing relevance and intensely studied. In this contribution we present a data-driven optimization environment that enables to identify the ecological potential of different concepts for different scenarios. The parametrization of each powertrain concept is dedicatedly optimized to minimize the ecological impact, which allows for an unbiased and reliable comparison on an uniform evaluation basis. To exploit the potential of each single powertrain parametrization, the operating strategy of the powertrain is adapted. Naturalistic driving profiles, including the speed, acceleration and road-slope information are depicted by multidimensional and representative driving cycles, allowing for an efficient search of the real-driving-optimal powertrain parametrizations within the optimization. In this study, we investigate long-range capable vehicles for a scenario in the reference year 2030 in Germany. Conventional vehicles, battery electric vehicles, fuel cell electric vehicles and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles are examined. Finally, the results are compared to an evaluation of the CO2 emissions according to the Worldwide harmonized Light vehicles Test Procedure (WLTP).","PeriodicalId":244804,"journal":{"name":"Dritev – Drivetrain for Vehicles 2020","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dritev – Drivetrain for Vehicles 2020","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25534/TUPRINTS-00011933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In order to limit the effects of man-made climate change, the assessment of the ecological impact of different powertrain concepts is of increasing relevance and intensely studied. In this contribution we present a data-driven optimization environment that enables to identify the ecological potential of different concepts for different scenarios. The parametrization of each powertrain concept is dedicatedly optimized to minimize the ecological impact, which allows for an unbiased and reliable comparison on an uniform evaluation basis. To exploit the potential of each single powertrain parametrization, the operating strategy of the powertrain is adapted. Naturalistic driving profiles, including the speed, acceleration and road-slope information are depicted by multidimensional and representative driving cycles, allowing for an efficient search of the real-driving-optimal powertrain parametrizations within the optimization. In this study, we investigate long-range capable vehicles for a scenario in the reference year 2030 in Germany. Conventional vehicles, battery electric vehicles, fuel cell electric vehicles and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles are examined. Finally, the results are compared to an evaluation of the CO2 emissions according to the Worldwide harmonized Light vehicles Test Procedure (WLTP).
利用数据驱动的优化环境,对动力总成概念的生态影响进行基于实际驾驶的比较
为了限制人为气候变化的影响,对不同动力系统概念的生态影响的评估越来越重要,并得到了广泛的研究。在这篇文章中,我们提出了一个数据驱动的优化环境,可以识别不同概念在不同场景下的生态潜力。每个动力系统概念的参数化都经过专门优化,以最大限度地减少对生态的影响,从而在统一的评估基础上进行公正可靠的比较。为了挖掘动力系统各参数化的潜力,对动力系统的运行策略进行了调整。通过多维度和代表性的驾驶循环来描述包括速度、加速度和道路坡度信息在内的自然驾驶剖面,从而在优化过程中有效地搜索到实际驾驶中最优的动力系统参数。在这项研究中,我们调查了在德国2030年参考情景的远程车辆。对传统汽车、纯电动汽车、燃料电池汽车和插电式混合动力汽车进行了研究。最后,根据全球统一轻型车辆测试程序(WLTP),将结果与二氧化碳排放评估进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信