Stepping Up and Out: Strategies for Promoting Feminist Activism within Community Service-Learning

Maythee Rojas
{"title":"Stepping Up and Out: Strategies for Promoting Feminist Activism within Community Service-Learning","authors":"Maythee Rojas","doi":"10.5406/FEMTEACHER.24.1-2.0083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"© 2015 by the board of trustees of the university of ill inois Too often, the thought of wishing our students could step into our teaching shoes tends to cross our minds only when we feel particularly underappreciated or misunderstood. During an especially exasperating moment, we might reason that if students could only grasp the sheer amount of information, logistics, and patience that we balance every day, they would actually recognize the value of our instruction. Ironically, however, the authoritarian nature of traditional pedagogy is frequently what prevents this sensitivity from forming. Distanced from one another by the conventional power dynamics between student and professor, there is little opportunity for students to recognize the full scope of what teaching entails. While the result for us can be frustration, for students, the lack of active participation in their learning can lead to more significant disadvantages in their intellectual preparation. Teaching, as we know, allows one to “try out” what one has learned and articulate that knowledge to others. It builds skills. Without having their own turn at it, students can leave the classroom—and eventually the university—without a clear direction of how to perform their educations. In turn, this can prove detrimental to the job-seeking graduate, and it can further undo the very premise of our instruction. In particular, for those of us who identify as feminist instructors and see teaching as a conduit to promoting social justice, ensuring that students can “do” what they have learned seems essential. Indeed, rather than simply wanting students to take a spin at teaching so they can better relate to us, the real solution may lie in expanding such a fitful wish for gratitude into an overall teaching philosophy. In other words, pressing for a more reciprocal teaching environment in the classroom might not only garner us our students’ empathy more often, it could also pave the way for the greater social change we seek. Reciprocal collaboration, however, requires finding more opportunities than those typically offered in a traditional classroom setting. Even within feminist studies, where students’ participation in their individual educations has long been a central tenet of curricula, exercises that emphasize sharing what students have learned are frequently confined to campus or classroom activities. special issue, “feminist campus-community partnerships: intersections and interruptions”","PeriodicalId":287450,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Teacher","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/FEMTEACHER.24.1-2.0083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

© 2015 by the board of trustees of the university of ill inois Too often, the thought of wishing our students could step into our teaching shoes tends to cross our minds only when we feel particularly underappreciated or misunderstood. During an especially exasperating moment, we might reason that if students could only grasp the sheer amount of information, logistics, and patience that we balance every day, they would actually recognize the value of our instruction. Ironically, however, the authoritarian nature of traditional pedagogy is frequently what prevents this sensitivity from forming. Distanced from one another by the conventional power dynamics between student and professor, there is little opportunity for students to recognize the full scope of what teaching entails. While the result for us can be frustration, for students, the lack of active participation in their learning can lead to more significant disadvantages in their intellectual preparation. Teaching, as we know, allows one to “try out” what one has learned and articulate that knowledge to others. It builds skills. Without having their own turn at it, students can leave the classroom—and eventually the university—without a clear direction of how to perform their educations. In turn, this can prove detrimental to the job-seeking graduate, and it can further undo the very premise of our instruction. In particular, for those of us who identify as feminist instructors and see teaching as a conduit to promoting social justice, ensuring that students can “do” what they have learned seems essential. Indeed, rather than simply wanting students to take a spin at teaching so they can better relate to us, the real solution may lie in expanding such a fitful wish for gratitude into an overall teaching philosophy. In other words, pressing for a more reciprocal teaching environment in the classroom might not only garner us our students’ empathy more often, it could also pave the way for the greater social change we seek. Reciprocal collaboration, however, requires finding more opportunities than those typically offered in a traditional classroom setting. Even within feminist studies, where students’ participation in their individual educations has long been a central tenet of curricula, exercises that emphasize sharing what students have learned are frequently confined to campus or classroom activities. special issue, “feminist campus-community partnerships: intersections and interruptions”
在社区服务学习中促进女权主义活动的策略
通常,只有当我们感到特别不受重视或被误解时,我们才会想到希望我们的学生能接替我们的教学工作。在一个特别令人恼火的时刻,我们可能会想,如果学生能够掌握我们每天平衡的大量信息、后勤和耐心,他们就会真正认识到我们教学的价值。然而,具有讽刺意味的是,传统教育学的权威性质往往阻碍了这种敏感性的形成。由于学生和教授之间传统的权力动态关系,学生之间彼此疏远,几乎没有机会认识到教学所需要的全部范围。虽然对我们来说,结果可能是沮丧的,但对学生来说,缺乏积极的学习参与可能会导致他们在智力准备方面更严重的劣势。正如我们所知,教学允许一个人“尝试”自己所学到的知识,并将这些知识表达给他人。它能培养技能。如果没有自己的机会,学生们离开教室——最终离开大学——就没有一个明确的方向来完成他们的教育。反过来,这对找工作的毕业生来说是有害的,它会进一步破坏我们教学的前提。特别是,对于我们这些认为自己是女权主义教师,并将教学视为促进社会正义的渠道的人来说,确保学生能够“做”他们所学到的东西似乎是至关重要的。事实上,与其简单地让学生在教学中尝试一下,这样他们就能更好地与我们建立联系,真正的解决方案可能在于将这种断断续续的感恩愿望扩展成一种整体的教学理念。换句话说,迫切要求在课堂上建立一个更加互惠的教学环境,不仅可以让我们的学生更容易产生共鸣,还可以为我们所寻求的更大的社会变革铺平道路。然而,与传统课堂环境相比,互惠合作需要寻找更多的机会。即使在女权主义研究中,学生对个人教育的参与长期以来一直是课程的中心原则,强调分享学生所学知识的练习也经常局限于校园或课堂活动。特刊,“女权主义校园-社区伙伴关系:交叉点和中断”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信