Durchsetzungsdefizite bei Gleichbehandlungsgeboten am Beispiel des Gender Pricing

Sarah Legner
{"title":"Durchsetzungsdefizite bei Gleichbehandlungsgeboten am Beispiel des Gender Pricing","authors":"Sarah Legner","doi":"10.5771/2193-7869-2021-1-34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gender Pricing is a widespread phenomenon. According to various studies, women-specific products and services often are more costly than comparable versions of products and services for men. As products made for women are frequently coloured pink, Gender Pricing is referred to as “pink tax”. European anti-discrimination legislation imposes restrictions on gender-related price discrimination. The 2004 Gender Directive bans discrimination in the field of goods and services. In principle, the directive prohibits any less favourable treatment of men or women by reason of their gender. Nevertheless, the additional price added on products intended for women is widely accepted. This raises the question of whether Gender Pricing points to a lack of law enforcement. Against this backdrop, the scope of the legal restrictions imposed on Gender Pricing will be analysed. Subsequently, the challenges of implementing anti-discrimination laws must be taken into account. Finally, conclusions will be drawn on possible courses of action to enhance their mandatory strength.","PeriodicalId":275616,"journal":{"name":"Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/2193-7869-2021-1-34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gender Pricing is a widespread phenomenon. According to various studies, women-specific products and services often are more costly than comparable versions of products and services for men. As products made for women are frequently coloured pink, Gender Pricing is referred to as “pink tax”. European anti-discrimination legislation imposes restrictions on gender-related price discrimination. The 2004 Gender Directive bans discrimination in the field of goods and services. In principle, the directive prohibits any less favourable treatment of men or women by reason of their gender. Nevertheless, the additional price added on products intended for women is widely accepted. This raises the question of whether Gender Pricing points to a lack of law enforcement. Against this backdrop, the scope of the legal restrictions imposed on Gender Pricing will be analysed. Subsequently, the challenges of implementing anti-discrimination laws must be taken into account. Finally, conclusions will be drawn on possible courses of action to enhance their mandatory strength.
我是就业歧视法里缺乏执行的一个例子
性别定价是一种普遍现象。根据各种研究,针对女性的产品和服务往往比针对男性的同类产品和服务更昂贵。由于为女性制造的产品通常是粉红色的,性别定价被称为“粉色税”。欧洲反歧视立法限制与性别有关的价格歧视。2004年《性别指令》禁止在商品和服务领域的歧视。原则上,该指示禁止因男女性别而给予任何较差的待遇。然而,针对女性的产品加价是被广泛接受的。这就提出了一个问题:性别定价是否表明缺乏执法。在此背景下,将分析对性别定价施加的法律限制的范围。随后,必须考虑到执行反歧视法的挑战。最后,将就加强其强制性的可能行动方针作出结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信