Tradition and Originality in Raphael: The Stanza della Segnatura, the Middle Ages and Local Traditions

D. Rijser
{"title":"Tradition and Originality in Raphael: The Stanza della Segnatura, the Middle Ages and Local Traditions","authors":"D. Rijser","doi":"10.1163/9789004378216_006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"However much has changed in Renaissance studies, the iconicity of Raphael’s School of Athens in the Vatican Stanze tenaciously continues to hold sway, even when scholars seemingly undermine it by innovative research. Thus a recent attempt to explore undeniably new ways of looking at functions and versions of the past in Renaissance culture eventually cedes to ‘the compulsion to end the account with Raphael’.1 Concluding their study of the interaction between the “substitutional” (that is, art independent of time, author and style but as an instance in a chain of replicas) and the “performative” (art as authorial enunciation) in Quattrocento artistic production, Nagel and Wood in Anachronic Renaissance present a Raphael rightly seen à cheval. Stunningly innovative and stylistically individualized as Raphael’s frescoes were, they were in fact positioned within a traditional context of a (pseudo-) mosaic ceiling and a (neo-) cosmatesque pavement, a defining frame the modern viewer all too easily blocks out of view, concentrating instead on the frescoes as easelpieces.2 Yet if Raphael’s art indeed advanced a highly individual artistic claim for excellence, it did so quite consciously within a monumental context that played the old game of reproducing form including its “atmosphere” that was as highly traditional [Fig. 4.1]. The authenticating function of “substitution” as construed by recent scholarship is surely relevant for the search for an appropriate past studied in this volume.3 The recreation of ambience and concomitant content was the essential tool with which to manipulate visitors and viewers of representative space","PeriodicalId":104280,"journal":{"name":"The Quest for an Appropriate Past in Literature, Art and Architecture","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Quest for an Appropriate Past in Literature, Art and Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004378216_006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

However much has changed in Renaissance studies, the iconicity of Raphael’s School of Athens in the Vatican Stanze tenaciously continues to hold sway, even when scholars seemingly undermine it by innovative research. Thus a recent attempt to explore undeniably new ways of looking at functions and versions of the past in Renaissance culture eventually cedes to ‘the compulsion to end the account with Raphael’.1 Concluding their study of the interaction between the “substitutional” (that is, art independent of time, author and style but as an instance in a chain of replicas) and the “performative” (art as authorial enunciation) in Quattrocento artistic production, Nagel and Wood in Anachronic Renaissance present a Raphael rightly seen à cheval. Stunningly innovative and stylistically individualized as Raphael’s frescoes were, they were in fact positioned within a traditional context of a (pseudo-) mosaic ceiling and a (neo-) cosmatesque pavement, a defining frame the modern viewer all too easily blocks out of view, concentrating instead on the frescoes as easelpieces.2 Yet if Raphael’s art indeed advanced a highly individual artistic claim for excellence, it did so quite consciously within a monumental context that played the old game of reproducing form including its “atmosphere” that was as highly traditional [Fig. 4.1]. The authenticating function of “substitution” as construed by recent scholarship is surely relevant for the search for an appropriate past studied in this volume.3 The recreation of ambience and concomitant content was the essential tool with which to manipulate visitors and viewers of representative space
拉斐尔的传统与独创性:《贵族节》、中世纪与地方传统
无论文艺复兴研究发生了多大的变化,拉斐尔在梵蒂冈斯坦泽的雅典学派的标志性仍然顽强地占据着主导地位,即使学者们似乎用创新的研究破坏了它。因此,最近试图探索不可否认的新方法来看待文艺复兴文化中过去的功能和版本,最终让位于“与拉斐尔结束叙述的冲动”内格尔和伍德总结了他们对四世纪艺术生产中“替代”(即独立于时间、作者和风格的艺术,但作为复制品链中的一个实例)和“表演”(作为作者表达的艺术)之间相互作用的研究,在错误的文艺复兴时期呈现了一个正确的拉斐尔。尽管拉斐尔的壁画具有惊人的创新性和个性化风格,但它们实际上是在(伪)马赛克天花板和(新)cosmatesque人行道的传统背景下定位的,这是一个现代观众太容易挡住视线的定义框架,而是把注意力集中在壁画上然而,如果拉斐尔的艺术确实提出了一种高度个性化的卓越艺术主张,那么它是在一个巨大的背景下有意识地这样做的,这个背景玩了复制形式的旧游戏,包括高度传统的“氛围”[图4.1]。由最近的学术解释的“替代”的认证功能,当然是相关的,以寻找一个适当的过去在本卷研究氛围和相关内容的再创造是操纵代表性空间的访客和观众的必要工具
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信