Is Financial Crime a 'Crime', Proper so Called? A Study of the Legislative Developments in Sanctioning 'White Collar Crime' and an Assessment of What the Future Holds for Financial Fraud

Brian Ikol Adungo
{"title":"Is Financial Crime a 'Crime', Proper so Called? A Study of the Legislative Developments in Sanctioning 'White Collar Crime' and an Assessment of What the Future Holds for Financial Fraud","authors":"Brian Ikol Adungo","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1354052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“We do see market abuse - of which insider dealing is the highest profile aspect …[as] a financial crime - it may not attract the immediate moral outrage of a violent crime against a person but it is, in our view, and the view of the UK government, a serious white collar crime with potential sentences of up to 7 years imprisonment … We have not yet used our power to prosecute insider dealing as a criminal offence and we recognise that effective deterrence involves ensuring both that people fear being caught [and] they fear the consequences of being caught … but we also see the risk of criminal convictions and custodial penalties playing a real part in that.” Margaret Cole, Director of Enforcement, FSA addressing the American Bar Association (October 4, 2007). This study seeks to provide an analysis of, the current legislative, institutional and regulatory structure in the United Kingdom (UK) for punishing those who are regarded to commit ‘financial crime’,1 and more broadly what is commonly referred to as ‘white collar crime.’ This paper will therefore focus on the approaches taken to define ‘financial crime’ in the English law context, including the legal attempts over the years to criminalise ‘white collar crime.’ It will also highlight the difficulty that authorities have faced in pinning down financial crimes over the years. Further, the study will also delve into the institutional framework that has been devised to combat ‘financial crime’ over the years. These include: the Crown Prosecution Service, the Serious Fraud Office, other statutory regulatory bodies such as the Financial Services Authority (FSA) and the Department of Trade and Industry which has since been renamed the Department of Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR). This commentary will demonstrate the challenges that these institutions have gone through in a bid to address financial crime and that the Government has prioritised addressing the problem of financial crime; hence the multiple legislative and institutional responses directed at alleviating the problem. The study will also examine the legislative framework that has been directed at fighting white collar crime and pinpoint the challenges in the development of the criminal law and sanctions dealing with white collar crimes. It alludes to the diverse approaches advocated by various scholars over the years to address white collar criminality. This study will analyse what impact the new Fraud Act 2006 may have on the fight against white collar crime in the UK. The paper is primarily focussed on the UK jurisdiction and may in certain instances examine the European and US practices regarding financial crime.","PeriodicalId":376821,"journal":{"name":"White Collar Crime eJournal","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"White Collar Crime eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1354052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“We do see market abuse - of which insider dealing is the highest profile aspect …[as] a financial crime - it may not attract the immediate moral outrage of a violent crime against a person but it is, in our view, and the view of the UK government, a serious white collar crime with potential sentences of up to 7 years imprisonment … We have not yet used our power to prosecute insider dealing as a criminal offence and we recognise that effective deterrence involves ensuring both that people fear being caught [and] they fear the consequences of being caught … but we also see the risk of criminal convictions and custodial penalties playing a real part in that.” Margaret Cole, Director of Enforcement, FSA addressing the American Bar Association (October 4, 2007). This study seeks to provide an analysis of, the current legislative, institutional and regulatory structure in the United Kingdom (UK) for punishing those who are regarded to commit ‘financial crime’,1 and more broadly what is commonly referred to as ‘white collar crime.’ This paper will therefore focus on the approaches taken to define ‘financial crime’ in the English law context, including the legal attempts over the years to criminalise ‘white collar crime.’ It will also highlight the difficulty that authorities have faced in pinning down financial crimes over the years. Further, the study will also delve into the institutional framework that has been devised to combat ‘financial crime’ over the years. These include: the Crown Prosecution Service, the Serious Fraud Office, other statutory regulatory bodies such as the Financial Services Authority (FSA) and the Department of Trade and Industry which has since been renamed the Department of Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR). This commentary will demonstrate the challenges that these institutions have gone through in a bid to address financial crime and that the Government has prioritised addressing the problem of financial crime; hence the multiple legislative and institutional responses directed at alleviating the problem. The study will also examine the legislative framework that has been directed at fighting white collar crime and pinpoint the challenges in the development of the criminal law and sanctions dealing with white collar crimes. It alludes to the diverse approaches advocated by various scholars over the years to address white collar criminality. This study will analyse what impact the new Fraud Act 2006 may have on the fight against white collar crime in the UK. The paper is primarily focussed on the UK jurisdiction and may in certain instances examine the European and US practices regarding financial crime.
金融犯罪是一种“犯罪”吗?制裁“白领犯罪”的立法发展研究及对金融欺诈未来的评估
“我们确实认为市场滥用——其中内幕交易是最引人注目的方面……(作为)一种金融犯罪——它可能不会立即引起针对个人的暴力犯罪那样的道德愤怒,但在我们和英国政府看来,它确实如此。“这是一种严重的白领犯罪,可能被判处长达7年的监禁……我们尚未动用我们的权力将内幕交易作为刑事犯罪起诉,我们认识到,有效的威慑包括确保人们害怕被抓住(以及)他们害怕被抓住的后果……但我们也看到,刑事定罪和监禁处罚的风险在其中发挥了真正的作用。”Margaret Cole, FSA执行总监在美国律师协会的演讲(2007年10月4日)。本研究旨在分析英国目前的立法、制度和监管结构,以惩罚那些被认为犯下“金融犯罪”的人,1以及更广泛地通常被称为“白领犯罪”的人。因此,本文将重点关注在英国法律背景下定义“金融犯罪”的方法,包括多年来将“白领犯罪”定为刑事犯罪的法律尝试。这也将凸显出当局多年来在打击金融犯罪方面所面临的困难。此外,该研究还将深入研究多年来为打击“金融犯罪”而设计的制度框架。这些机构包括:皇家检察署、严重欺诈办公室、其他法定监管机构,如金融服务管理局(FSA)和贸易和工业部(现已更名为商业、企业和监管改革部)。本评论将展示这些机构在努力解决金融犯罪方面所经历的挑战,以及政府优先解决金融犯罪问题;因此,旨在减轻这一问题的多种立法和体制反应。这项研究还将审查旨在打击白领犯罪的立法框架,并指出在制定处理白领犯罪的刑法和制裁方面所面临的挑战。它暗指多年来各种学者倡导的解决白领犯罪的各种方法。本研究将分析2006年新的反欺诈法案可能对英国打击白领犯罪产生的影响。本文主要关注英国的司法管辖权,并可能在某些情况下审查欧洲和美国关于金融犯罪的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信