Stanislav Lem on the philosophy of language: recovery from fragments of phrases

P. Baryshnikov
{"title":"Stanislav Lem on the philosophy of language: recovery from fragments of phrases","authors":"P. Baryshnikov","doi":"10.17726/philit.2021.2.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines some of S. Lem’s statements about his philosophical and worldview positions regarding the mysterious nature of language and the linguistic sign, the connection between language, mind and reality. The main goal of the paper is to understand what texts on the philosophy of language the Polish thinker read and what attitude he has formed towards them. Lem is the follower of an analytical intellectual culture that focuses on the naturalistic worldview and the consequences of the “linguistic turn” in Western philosophy. For Lem, language is not only an interesting philosophical object, but also a complex precise instrument of his own creative thinking. In this regard, the philosophy of language for a writer cannot be based only on logical-linguistic atomistic methodology. Lem seeks (and finds) in his contemporary interdisciplinary methods ways to combine realistic and anti-realist positions. Many concepts, such as “the effect of semantic transparency”, “polymorphic language model”, “variation model” are quite correlated with modern theories of language and require additional philosophical comments.","PeriodicalId":216913,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Problems of IT & Cyberspace (PhilIT&C)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Problems of IT & Cyberspace (PhilIT&C)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17726/philit.2021.2.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines some of S. Lem’s statements about his philosophical and worldview positions regarding the mysterious nature of language and the linguistic sign, the connection between language, mind and reality. The main goal of the paper is to understand what texts on the philosophy of language the Polish thinker read and what attitude he has formed towards them. Lem is the follower of an analytical intellectual culture that focuses on the naturalistic worldview and the consequences of the “linguistic turn” in Western philosophy. For Lem, language is not only an interesting philosophical object, but also a complex precise instrument of his own creative thinking. In this regard, the philosophy of language for a writer cannot be based only on logical-linguistic atomistic methodology. Lem seeks (and finds) in his contemporary interdisciplinary methods ways to combine realistic and anti-realist positions. Many concepts, such as “the effect of semantic transparency”, “polymorphic language model”, “variation model” are quite correlated with modern theories of language and require additional philosophical comments.
斯坦尼斯拉夫·莱姆谈语言哲学:从断句中恢复
本文考察了莱姆在语言和语言符号的神秘本质、语言、心灵和现实之间的联系等方面的哲学和世界观立场。本文的主要目的是了解波兰思想家阅读了哪些关于语言哲学的文本,以及他对这些文本形成了什么态度。莱姆是一种分析型知识分子文化的追随者,这种文化关注自然主义世界观和西方哲学中“语言转向”的后果。对于莱姆来说,语言不仅是一个有趣的哲学对象,也是他自己创造性思维的复杂而精确的工具。在这方面,作家的语言哲学不能仅仅建立在逻辑-语言原子论方法论的基础上。Lem在他的当代跨学科方法中寻求(并发现)结合现实主义和反现实主义立场的方法。许多概念,如“语义透明效应”、“多态语言模型”、“变异模型”等,与现代语言理论有很大的相关性,需要额外的哲学评论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信