Moral Economy and Knowledge Production in a Security Bureaucracy

W. Schiffauer
{"title":"Moral Economy and Knowledge Production in a Security Bureaucracy","authors":"W. Schiffauer","doi":"10.14361/9783839451045-004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Germany's 1999/2000 citizenship law marked a shift in the country's self-definition from a non-immigration country to an immigration country. The general opening up of the German nation-state was soon followed by new closures, however. Discussions began on who should, and who should not be accepted as members of the re-invented nation-state. The debate centred on Muslim immigrants. How can Muslim immigrants become part of Germany when they adhere to a religion (and culture) with a long historical position as the quintessential other to European culture and society? What place, in particular, should be assigned to Muslim organisations that provide for doctrine and ritual? As the new Islamic presence in Germany was considered a key challenge for maintaining public security and order, the Ministry of the Interior took the lead in policy development. Within the ministry, security agencies, particularly the Office for the Protection of the Constitution (Verfassungsschutz) played a decisive role in generating knowledge about the newcomers and the structure and formation of Islamic politics. In this paper, I analyse the ways in which security knowledge is produced in the Ämter für Verfassungsschutz, the “Offices for the Protection of the Constitution”.1 I apply an emic approach, asking how bureaucrats in this institution perceive and categorise Islam, to show how this knowledge constitutes the foundation for various security strategies. I begin by sketching the mission and the vision of the Verfassungsschutz and exploring how ideas","PeriodicalId":395584,"journal":{"name":"The Bureaucratic Production of Difference","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bureaucratic Production of Difference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839451045-004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Germany's 1999/2000 citizenship law marked a shift in the country's self-definition from a non-immigration country to an immigration country. The general opening up of the German nation-state was soon followed by new closures, however. Discussions began on who should, and who should not be accepted as members of the re-invented nation-state. The debate centred on Muslim immigrants. How can Muslim immigrants become part of Germany when they adhere to a religion (and culture) with a long historical position as the quintessential other to European culture and society? What place, in particular, should be assigned to Muslim organisations that provide for doctrine and ritual? As the new Islamic presence in Germany was considered a key challenge for maintaining public security and order, the Ministry of the Interior took the lead in policy development. Within the ministry, security agencies, particularly the Office for the Protection of the Constitution (Verfassungsschutz) played a decisive role in generating knowledge about the newcomers and the structure and formation of Islamic politics. In this paper, I analyse the ways in which security knowledge is produced in the Ämter für Verfassungsschutz, the “Offices for the Protection of the Constitution”.1 I apply an emic approach, asking how bureaucrats in this institution perceive and categorise Islam, to show how this knowledge constitutes the foundation for various security strategies. I begin by sketching the mission and the vision of the Verfassungsschutz and exploring how ideas
安全官僚体系中的道德经济与知识生产
德国1999/2000年的公民法标志着该国从非移民国家到移民国家的自我定义的转变。然而,随着德意志民族国家的全面开放,很快又出现了新的封闭。讨论开始了,谁应该被接受,谁不应该被接受,成为重新发明的民族国家的成员。辩论的焦点是穆斯林移民。当穆斯林移民坚持一种宗教(和文化)作为欧洲文化和社会的典型的他者具有悠久的历史地位时,他们怎么能成为德国的一部分呢?特别是,应该给提供教义和仪式的穆斯林组织分配什么位置?由于伊斯兰教在德国的新存在被认为是维护公共安全和秩序的一个关键挑战,内政部带头制定了政策。在该部内部,安全机构,特别是宪法保护办公室(Verfassungsschutz)在了解新来者以及伊斯兰政治的结构和形成方面发挥了决定性作用。在本文中,我分析了安全知识在Ämter fgr Verfassungsschutz(“保护宪法的办公室”)中产生的方式我采用了一种主题方法,询问该机构的官员如何看待和分类伊斯兰教,以展示这些知识如何构成各种安全战略的基础。我首先概述了Verfassungsschutz的使命和愿景,并探讨了想法如何
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信